restrictionist

简明释义

英[rɪˈstrɪkʃənɪst]美[rɪˈstrɪkʃənɪst]

adj. 限制主义的

n. 限制主义

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Too many share his rigid restrictionist convictions .

许多人具有和他一样的僵化的限制主义信念。

2.Too many share his rigid restrictionist convictions .

许多人具有和他一样的僵化的限制主义信念。

3.The government's new immigration policy has been criticized as being overly restrictionist 限制主义的, limiting the number of refugees allowed into the country.

政府的新移民政策因过于限制主义的而受到批评，限制了允许进入该国的难民数量。

4.Many restrictionist 限制主义的 groups argue that stricter border controls are necessary to protect national security.

许多限制主义的团体认为，严格的边境控制是保护国家安全所必需的。

5.The restrictionist 限制主义的 approach to trade has sparked debates among economists about its long-term effects.

对贸易的限制主义的方法引发了经济学家们对其长期影响的辩论。

6.Activists claim that the restrictionist 限制主义的 policies are harmful to families trying to reunite.

活动人士声称，这些限制主义的政策对试图团聚的家庭造成了伤害。

7.In recent years, the rise of restrictionist 限制主义的 sentiments has been evident in various countries around the world.

近年来，世界各国明显出现了限制主义的情绪上升的现象。

作文

In recent years, the debate surrounding immigration policies has intensified in many countries. At the forefront of this discussion are those who identify as restrictionists, advocating for stricter controls on immigration and often promoting a nationalist agenda. The term restrictionist refers to individuals or groups that support limitations on immigration, often citing concerns over national security, economic stability, and cultural preservation. These advocates argue that an influx of immigrants can strain public resources, increase competition for jobs, and dilute national identity. One of the primary arguments made by restrictionists is the economic impact of immigration. They claim that immigrants take jobs away from native citizens, particularly in low-skilled labor markets. This perspective is often supported by data showing that wages can stagnate or decline in industries heavily populated by immigrant workers. For instance, in sectors like construction or agriculture, where labor demand is high, restrictionists argue that the availability of cheaper labor from abroad undermines the earning potential of local workers. Moreover, restrictionists frequently express concerns about the social implications of immigration. They argue that large numbers of immigrants can lead to cultural clashes and a loss of shared values. In their view, maintaining a cohesive national identity is paramount, and they believe that unchecked immigration threatens this unity. This sentiment can be especially pronounced in times of economic uncertainty or political strife, where fear and mistrust can exacerbate divisions within society. Despite these arguments, critics of restrictionists contend that immigration is not only beneficial but essential for economic growth and cultural enrichment. They point to research indicating that immigrants contribute significantly to innovation, entrepreneurship, and the labor force. Many successful businesses in tech, healthcare, and other sectors have been founded or led by immigrants. Furthermore, proponents of more open immigration policies argue that diversity fosters creativity and resilience in societies, making them better equipped to face global challenges. The restrictionist viewpoint has gained traction in various political arenas, often leading to the implementation of more stringent immigration laws. For instance, some countries have enacted measures such as travel bans, increased border security, and reduced quotas for refugees and asylum seekers. While these policies may satisfy the demands of restrictionists, they also face significant opposition from human rights advocates and organizations that emphasize the importance of compassion and humanitarian assistance. In conclusion, the discourse surrounding immigration continues to evolve, with restrictionists playing a pivotal role in shaping public opinion and policy. Understanding their perspective is crucial for fostering constructive dialogue on immigration issues. While it is essential to address the legitimate concerns raised by restrictionists, it is equally important to recognize the contributions of immigrants and the value of diversity in our societies. Striking a balance between security and openness will require thoughtful consideration and collaboration among all stakeholders involved in this complex issue.

近年来，许多国家围绕移民政策的辩论愈演愈烈。在这场讨论的最前沿，是那些自称为限制主义者的人，他们倡导对移民实施更严格的控制，并常常推动民族主义议程。术语限制主义者指的是支持对移民进行限制的个人或团体，他们通常会引用国家安全、经济稳定和文化保护等问题。这些倡导者认为，移民的涌入可能会对公共资源造成压力，增加就业竞争，并稀释国家身份。 限制主义者提出的主要论点之一是移民对经济的影响。他们声称，移民抢走了本国公民的工作，尤其是在低技能劳动市场。这个观点常常得到数据的支持，这些数据显示，在大量移民工人聚集的行业中，工资可能会停滞或下降。例如，在建筑或农业等行业，劳动需求很高，限制主义者认为，来自国外的廉价劳动力的可用性削弱了当地工人的收入潜力。 此外，限制主义者经常表达对移民社会影响的担忧。他们认为，大量移民可能导致文化冲突和共同价值观的丧失。在他们看来，维护一个凝聚的民族身份是至关重要的，他们相信，无法控制的移民威胁着这种团结。这种情绪在经济不确定或政治动荡时期尤为明显，此时恐惧和不信任可能加剧社会内部的分裂。 尽管有这些论点，但限制主义者的批评者认为，移民不仅是有益的，而且对经济增长和文化丰富至关重要。他们指出研究表明，移民对创新、创业和劳动力的贡献显著。许多成功的企业，尤其是在科技、医疗等领域，都是由移民创办或领导的。此外，更开放的移民政策的支持者认为，多样性促进了社会的创造力和韧性，使其更能应对全球挑战。 限制主义者的观点在各种政治领域获得了支持，往往导致实施更严格的移民法律。例如，一些国家出台了旅行禁令、加强边境安全以及减少难民和寻求庇护者的配额等措施。虽然这些政策可能满足限制主义者的要求，但它们也面临来自人权倡导者和强调同情心及人道主义援助的重要性的组织的重大反对。 总之，围绕移民的讨论仍在不断发展，限制主义者在塑造公众舆论和政策方面发挥了关键作用。理解他们的观点对于促进关于移民问题的建设性对话至关重要。虽然必须解决限制主义者提出的合理担忧，但同样重要的是认识到移民的贡献以及多样性在我们社会中的价值。在安全与开放之间取得平衡，将需要所有利益相关者对这一复杂问题进行深思熟虑的考虑和合作。