unsubstantiated

简明释义

英[ˌʌnsəbˈstænʃieɪtɪd]美[ˌʌnsəbˈstænʃieɪtɪd]

adj. 未经证实的，无事实根据的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.There are reports that some military aircraft flew information when they were low on fuel during the Second World War, but Dr. Lissaman says they are unsubstantiated.

有报道称，二战期间，一些军机曾在燃料不足的情况下编队飞行。但利萨曼博士表示，这些说法没有根据。

2.After several tense exchanges, Rice warned that any unsubstantiated allegations made by Washington politicians would be deeply damaging and wrong.

经历过几轮紧张的交锋后，赖斯警告任何来自华盛顿政客方面未经证实的指责，都是错误的并会带来严重的伤害。

3.The Ministry of Defence (MoD) said they were aware of "unsubstantiated" claims, and launched an investigation before the allegations were reported in the press.

英国国防部表示，他们已经获知这个“未经证实的”消息，并且在媒体曝光之前就已着手调查。

4.Many of these reports may be unsubstantiated, originating from dubious Afghan informants.

其中的很多报告可能不属实，它们来自可疑的阿富汗告密者。

5.Pakistan’s ambassador to the United States said the reports were unsubstantiated and “do not reflect the current on-ground realities.”

巴基斯坦驻美大使称，这些报告缺乏证据并且“没有反映现在的现实。”

6.This does seem rather a vague palliative, however, and Mr Osman’s occasional resort to unsubstantiated facts and dangling assertions does not help his argument.

然而，看起来这的确是一个含糊的姑息手段，偶尔的未经证实的事实和摇摆不定的断言对奥斯曼的论证并无帮助。

7.It is often used casually to refer to unsubstantiated personal opinions, in contrast to knowledge and fact-based beliefs.

通常随意引用未经证实的个人观点，与知识和基于事实的信念相比较。

8.Many contemporary publications quote figures that are unsubstantiated.

许多现行刊物所采用的数字是不确切的。

9.The claims made by the whistleblower were found to be unsubstantiated.

举报者所提出的指控被发现是没有证据支持的。

10.Despite the rumors, there is no unsubstantiated evidence linking him to the scandal.

尽管有传言，但没有没有证据支持的证据将他与丑闻联系在一起。

11.The report contained several unsubstantiated allegations against the company.

该报告包含了对公司的几项没有证据支持的指控。

12.Her unsubstantiated claims about the product's effectiveness led to customer complaints.

她关于产品有效性的没有证据支持的说法导致了客户投诉。

13.The article was criticized for spreading unsubstantiated facts.

这篇文章因传播没有证据支持的事实而受到批评。

作文

In today's world, where information is abundant and easily accessible, the importance of verifying facts cannot be overstated. Many individuals and organizations often make claims that lack substantial evidence, leading to the spread of misinformation. These claims can be categorized as unsubstantiated (未被证实的), meaning they are not supported by adequate proof or reliable sources. This essay will explore the implications of unsubstantiated claims in various contexts, including social media, journalism, and scientific research. Firstly, social media platforms have become breeding grounds for unsubstantiated (未被证实的) information. With the rise of platforms like Twitter and Facebook, anyone can share their thoughts and opinions with a global audience. Unfortunately, this democratization of information sharing has led to the rapid dissemination of falsehoods. For instance, during election seasons, numerous unsubstantiated (未被证实的) allegations about candidates can circulate, influencing public opinion and voter behavior. As a result, it becomes crucial for users to critically evaluate the information they encounter and seek credible sources before forming conclusions. Moreover, journalism plays a vital role in shaping public perception, and it is essential for journalists to uphold ethical standards in their reporting. When journalists report on stories without thorough fact-checking, they risk propagating unsubstantiated (未被证实的) claims that can damage reputations and misinform the public. For example, if a news outlet reports on a celebrity's supposed scandal without confirming the details, it may lead to widespread speculation and public outrage based on mere rumors. Therefore, responsible journalism requires a commitment to accuracy and accountability, ensuring that the information presented is well-substantiated. In the realm of scientific research, the consequences of unsubstantiated (未被证实的) claims can be particularly detrimental. Researchers must adhere to rigorous methodologies and provide empirical evidence to support their findings. When studies are published with unsubstantiated (未被证实的) results, it can mislead other scientists and the general public, potentially hindering progress in important fields such as medicine and environmental science. For instance, if a study claims that a certain drug is effective without sufficient clinical trials, it could lead to harmful consequences for patients relying on that treatment. Furthermore, the presence of unsubstantiated (未被证实的) claims can erode trust in institutions and experts. When people encounter repeated instances of misinformation, they may become skeptical of legitimate sources of information, leading to a general decline in trust. This phenomenon is particularly concerning in times of crisis, such as during a pandemic, where accurate information is critical for public health. If individuals are exposed to unsubstantiated (未被证实的) claims regarding vaccine efficacy, for instance, it may deter them from getting vaccinated, ultimately jeopardizing community health efforts. In conclusion, the prevalence of unsubstantiated (未被证实的) claims in various aspects of society underscores the need for critical thinking and responsible information consumption. Whether on social media, in journalism, or within scientific research, the propagation of unverified information can have serious repercussions. It is imperative for individuals to question the validity of the claims they encounter and seek out credible sources. By doing so, we can foster a more informed society and mitigate the impact of unsubstantiated (未被证实的) information on our lives.

在当今这个信息丰富且易于获取的世界中，验证事实的重要性不容小觑。许多个人和组织常常提出缺乏实质证据的主张，导致错误信息的传播。这些主张可以被归类为未被证实的，意思是它们没有得到充分的证据或可靠来源的支持。本文将探讨未被证实的主张在社交媒体、新闻报道和科学研究等不同背景下的影响。 首先，社交媒体平台已成为未被证实的信息的滋生地。随着Twitter和Facebook等平台的兴起，任何人都可以与全球受众分享他们的想法和意见。不幸的是，这种信息共享的民主化导致了虚假信息的迅速传播。例如，在选举季节，关于候选人的众多未被证实的指控可能会流传，影响公众舆论和选民行为。因此，用户必须批判性地评估他们所遇到的信息，并在形成结论之前寻求可信的来源。 此外，新闻业在塑造公众认知方面发挥着至关重要的作用，记者在报道中遵循伦理标准至关重要。当记者在没有彻底核实事实的情况下报道故事时，他们就有可能传播未被证实的主张，这可能损害声誉并误导公众。例如，如果一家新闻机构在没有确认细节的情况下报道某位名人的丑闻，这可能会导致基于纯粹谣言的广泛猜测和公众愤怒。因此，负责任的新闻工作需要对准确性和问责制的承诺，确保所提供的信息是经过充分证实的。 在科学研究领域，未被证实的主张的后果尤其有害。研究人员必须遵循严格的方法论，并提供实证证据来支持他们的发现。当研究以未被证实的结果发表时，可能会误导其他科学家和公众，从而潜在地阻碍医学和环境科学等重要领域的进展。例如，如果一项研究声称某种药物有效，但没有足够的临床试验，这可能会导致依赖该治疗的患者遭受有害后果。 此外，未被证实的主张的存在可能会侵蚀人们对机构和专家的信任。当人们遇到重复出现的错误信息时，他们可能会对合法的信息来源产生怀疑，从而导致信任度普遍下降。在危机时期，例如在大流行期间，准确的信息对于公共健康至关重要。如果个人接触到关于疫苗有效性的未被证实的主张，这可能会阻止他们接种疫苗，从而最终危及社区健康工作。 总之，未被证实的主张在社会各个方面的普遍存在突显了批判性思维和负责任的信息消费的必要性。无论是在社交媒体上、新闻报道中还是在科学研究中，未经验证的信息传播都可能产生严重后果。个人必须质疑他们遇到的主张的有效性，并寻求可信的来源。通过这样做，我们可以培养一个更有信息的社会，并减轻未被证实的信息对我们生活的影响。