isocracy

简明释义

英[aɪˈsɒkrəsi]美[aɪˈsɑːkrəsi]

n. 权力平等主义；平等参政权

复 数 i s o c r a c i e s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The concept of isocracy emphasizes equality in political power among all citizens.

概念isocracy强调所有公民在政治权力上的平等。

2.In an isocracy, every individual's vote carries the same weight.

在isocracy中，每个人的投票权重相同。

3.The movement towards isocracy seeks to dismantle hierarchies in governance.

朝着isocracy的运动旨在拆除治理中的等级制度。

4.Advocates of isocracy argue that it leads to more representative and fair decision-making.

支持isocracy的人认为这会导致更具代表性和公平的决策。

5.Many democratic societies strive for an isocracy, where all voices are heard equally.

许多民主社会努力实现isocracy，让所有声音都能平等地被听到。

作文

In the modern political landscape, various forms of governance are often discussed and debated. One such form is known as isocracy, which refers to a system of government where all citizens have equal power and influence in decision-making processes. This concept is derived from the Greek words 'iso', meaning equal, and 'kratos', meaning power or rule. In an isocracy, the emphasis is placed on equality among individuals, ensuring that each person's voice carries the same weight in political matters. The idea of isocracy can be seen as a response to the inequalities present in many democratic systems. While democracy aims to provide a platform for all citizens to participate, it often falls short due to various factors such as socioeconomic disparities, unequal access to education, and systemic biases. These issues can lead to a situation where only a select few have the means to influence political outcomes, thereby undermining the very principles of democracy itself. One of the key advantages of an isocracy is its potential to foster a more inclusive political environment. By ensuring that every individual has an equal say, it encourages diverse perspectives and ideas to be represented in governance. This inclusivity can lead to more comprehensive and effective policies, as the needs and desires of all citizens are taken into account. In contrast, systems that allow for unequal power dynamics often result in the marginalization of certain groups, leading to policies that do not reflect the interests of the broader population. However, implementing an isocracy poses significant challenges. Achieving true equality in political power requires overcoming deeply entrenched societal structures and norms. For instance, addressing economic inequalities is crucial, as those with greater financial resources often have more access to political influence. Additionally, fostering a culture of civic engagement and education is essential to ensure that all citizens understand their rights and responsibilities within an isocracy. Moreover, the practicalities of governance in an isocracy must be carefully considered. Decision-making processes need to be designed in a way that allows for efficient and effective governance while still upholding the principle of equality. This may involve innovative approaches to voting, deliberation, and consensus-building that prioritize the input of all citizens. In conclusion, isocracy represents a compelling vision for a more equitable political system. By emphasizing equal power among citizens, it seeks to address the shortcomings of traditional democratic frameworks. While challenges remain in realizing this ideal, the pursuit of an isocracy could lead to a more just and representative society. As we navigate the complexities of modern governance, the principles underlying isocracy serve as a valuable reminder of the importance of equality and inclusivity in political discourse.

在现代政治格局中，各种治理形式经常被讨论和辩论。其中一种形式被称为平等统治，指的是一种政府体系，在这种体系中，所有公民在决策过程中拥有平等的权力和影响力。这个概念源自希腊语单词“iso”，意为平等，以及“kratos”，意为权力或统治。在平等统治中，强调个人之间的平等，确保每个人的声音在政治事务中具有同等的分量。 平等统治的理念可以被视为对许多民主制度中存在的不平等现象的回应。尽管民主旨在为所有公民提供参与的平台，但由于社会经济差异、教育获取的不平等以及系统性偏见等各种因素，它往往未能实现。这些问题可能导致只有少数人能够影响政治结果，从而削弱了民主原则本身。 平等统治的一个主要优点是其潜在的促进更具包容性的政治环境。通过确保每个个体都有平等的发言权，它鼓励多样的观点和思想在治理中得到体现。这种包容性可以导致更全面和有效的政策，因为所有公民的需求和愿望都被考虑在内。相比之下，允许不平等权力动态的制度往往导致某些群体的边缘化，从而导致不反映更广泛人口利益的政策。 然而，实施平等统治面临重大挑战。实现政治权力的真正平等需要克服根深蒂固的社会结构和规范。例如，解决经济不平等至关重要，因为拥有更多财力资源的人往往对政治影响有更多的获取。此外，培养公民参与和教育的文化对于确保所有公民理解他们在平等统治中的权利和责任至关重要。 此外，平等统治中的治理实务必须仔细考虑。决策过程需要设计得以允许高效和有效的治理，同时仍然维护平等原则。这可能涉及创新的方法来投票、讨论和达成共识，优先考虑所有公民的意见。 总之，平等统治代表了一种更公平政治体系的引人注目的愿景。通过强调公民之间的平等权力，它试图解决传统民主框架的缺陷。尽管实现这一理想仍面临挑战，但追求平等统治可能会导致一个更公正和更具代表性的社会。在我们应对现代治理的复杂性时，平等统治的基本原则提醒我们在政治话语中平等和包容性的重要性。