recusal

简明释义

英[rɪˈkjuːzl]美[rɪˈkjuːzl]

n. 取消资格；宣布不合格

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Tightening rules for recusal would help, says James Sample of New York University’s Brennan Centre.

纽约大学布李南中心的JamesSample认为强化法律法规会有所帮助。

2.Tightening rules for recusal would help, says James Sample of New York University’s Brennan Centre.

纽约大学布李南中心的JamesSample认为强化法律法规会有所帮助。

3.He said the court provided no guidance about when recusal will be constitutionally required.

他说，最高法院没有明确指导规定，在什么情况下应该要求取消资格。

4.Rules for recusal do exist.

回避规则确实存在。

5.The judge announced his recusal from the case due to a conflict of interest.

法官因利益冲突宣布对该案件的回避。

6.Her recusal was necessary to maintain the integrity of the trial.

她的回避是维护审判公正所必需的。

7.After reviewing the evidence, the attorney decided on a voluntary recusal.

在审查证据后，律师决定自愿回避。

8.The ethics board recommended the recusal of the official from the investigation.

伦理委员会建议该官员从调查中回避。

9.His recusal from the committee was seen as a responsible decision.

他从委员会的回避被视为负责任的决定。

作文

In the realm of law and ethics, the concept of recusal plays a pivotal role in ensuring fairness and impartiality. Recusal refers to the process by which a judge, juror, or any official withdraws from participating in a legal proceeding due to a potential conflict of interest or bias. This practice is essential in maintaining the integrity of the judicial system, as it helps to prevent any undue influence that could compromise the outcome of a case. For instance, consider a scenario where a judge has a personal relationship with one of the parties involved in a trial. If this judge were to preside over the case without stepping aside, it could lead to questions about their impartiality. In such situations, the judge must recognize the necessity of recusal to uphold the principles of justice and ensure that all parties receive a fair hearing. The importance of recusal extends beyond the courtroom. In various professional settings, individuals are often required to disclose any potential conflicts of interest and may need to recusal themselves from decision-making processes. For example, a member of a corporate board may have a financial stake in a company that is being considered for a merger. To avoid any appearance of impropriety, this board member should voluntarily recusal themselves from discussions and votes related to that merger. Moreover, the implications of failing to adhere to the principle of recusal can be severe. If a judge or official does not step aside when they should, it can lead to appeals and retrials, undermining public confidence in the legal system. In extreme cases, it may even result in disciplinary actions against the official involved. Therefore, understanding when and how to implement recusal is crucial for anyone in a position of authority. The process of recusal is not always straightforward. It requires individuals to evaluate their relationships and interests critically. There are often guidelines and ethical standards in place to assist individuals in making these determinations. Legal professionals are trained to recognize situations that warrant recusal, but it is also the responsibility of individuals to be aware of their biases and potential conflicts. In conclusion, recusal is an essential mechanism that safeguards the integrity of legal proceedings and professional environments. By ensuring that individuals with potential conflicts step aside, we promote fairness, transparency, and trust in our systems. As society continues to evolve, the principles surrounding recusal will remain a cornerstone of ethical practice, reminding us of the importance of impartiality in all aspects of decision-making. Understanding and applying the concept of recusal is vital for anyone involved in governance, law, or any field where impartiality is paramount.

在法律和伦理的领域中，recusal（回避）这一概念在确保公正和客观方面发挥着重要作用。Recusal 指的是法官、陪审员或任何官员因潜在利益冲突或偏见而退出参与法律程序的过程。这一做法对于维护司法系统的完整性至关重要，因为它有助于防止任何可能影响案件结果的不当影响。 例如，考虑一个场景，其中一位法官与审判中涉及的一方有个人关系。如果这位法官在没有回避的情况下主持案件，可能会引发对其公正性的质疑。在这种情况下，法官必须认识到进行recusal的必要性，以维护正义原则并确保所有当事人都能获得公平的听证。 Recusal的重要性超越了法庭。在各种专业环境中，个人通常需要披露任何潜在的利益冲突，并可能需要在决策过程中进行recusal。例如，某公司董事会成员可能在考虑合并的公司中拥有财务利益。为了避免任何不当行为的外观，该董事会成员应自愿从与该合并相关的讨论和投票中回避。 此外，未能遵循recusal原则的后果可能是严重的。如果法官或官员在应该回避的情况下不这样做，可能会导致上诉和重审，从而削弱公众对法律系统的信心。在极端情况下，这甚至可能导致对相关官员的纪律处分。因此，理解何时以及如何实施recusal对任何处于权威地位的人来说都是至关重要的。 Recusal的过程并不总是简单明了。它要求个人对自己的关系和利益进行批判性评估。通常有指导方针和伦理标准来帮助个人做出这些决定。法律专业人士经过培训以识别需要进行recusal的情况，但个人也有责任意识到自己的偏见和潜在冲突。 总之，recusal是一个保护法律程序和专业环境完整性的基本机制。通过确保具有潜在冲突的个人退位，我们促进了公正、透明和对我们系统的信任。随着社会的不断发展，围绕recusal的原则将继续成为伦理实践的基石，提醒我们在所有决策中保持公正的重要性。理解和应用recusal的概念对于任何参与治理、法律或任何需要公正的领域的人来说都是至关重要的。