judgeship

简明释义

英[ˈdʒʌdʒʃɪp]美[ˈdʒʌdʒʃɪp]

n. 法官的职权；法官的地位

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.But God's righteous judgeship is seen in the punishment of the lawbreaker as well as in the deliverance of the justified.

但是上帝的正义的法官是在惩治坏人以及解脱的理由。

2.But God's righteous judgeship is seen in the punishment of the lawbreaker as well as in the deliverance of the justified.

但是上帝的正义的法官是在惩治坏人以及解脱的理由。

3.Dream of lawyers more concerned about justice than a judgeship.

梦见这样的律师吧，他们对公正比对一场审判更关切。

4.After years of hard work, she finally achieved her dream of obtaining a judgeship.

经过多年的努力，她终于实现了获得法官职位的梦想。

5.The process of applying for a judgeship can be quite competitive.

申请法官职位的过程可能相当竞争激烈。

6.He was appointed to a federal judgeship after a successful career in law.

在法律事业取得成功后，他被任命为联邦法官职位。

7.Her integrity and experience made her an excellent candidate for the judgeship.

她的诚信和经验使她成为法官职位的优秀候选人。

8.The judgeship requires not only legal knowledge but also strong ethical standards.

担任法官职位不仅需要法律知识，还需要较强的道德标准。

作文

The concept of judgeship is integral to the functioning of a fair and just legal system. It embodies the authority and responsibility of judges who interpret the law and ensure that justice is served. In many democratic societies, the role of a judge is not only crucial but also highly respected. The judgeship represents a position that requires extensive knowledge of the law, impartiality, and a strong ethical foundation. Judges are expected to make decisions based on facts, evidence, and legal principles rather than personal beliefs or societal pressures. In recent years, discussions surrounding judgeship have gained momentum, particularly concerning the appointment and accountability of judges. Many argue that the process of selecting judges should be transparent and free from political influence, as this ensures that they can perform their duties without bias. A fair judgeship is essential for maintaining public trust in the judicial system. When people believe that judges are selected based on merit rather than political connections, they are more likely to respect and abide by the law. Moreover, the responsibilities associated with judgeship extend beyond merely presiding over court cases. Judges often play a pivotal role in shaping legal precedents that can affect future rulings. Their interpretations of the law can lead to significant changes in how laws are applied, impacting society at large. Therefore, the weight of judgeship carries immense significance, as it influences not only individual cases but also the broader legal landscape. Additionally, the challenges faced by those in judgeship cannot be overlooked. Judges must navigate complex legal issues, manage courtroom dynamics, and sometimes deal with public scrutiny. The pressure to deliver fair and just outcomes can be overwhelming, especially in high-profile cases that attract media attention. This is why ongoing training and education are vital for judges. They must stay updated on legal developments and societal changes to fulfill their roles effectively. Furthermore, the concept of judgeship is not static; it evolves with society’s values and expectations. As issues such as social justice, equality, and human rights gain prominence, judges are increasingly called upon to consider these factors in their decision-making processes. This evolution highlights the importance of having judges who are not only knowledgeable about the law but also attuned to the ethical implications of their rulings. In conclusion, judgeship is a cornerstone of the legal system, embodying the principles of justice, integrity, and impartiality. The role of a judge is multifaceted, requiring a deep understanding of the law and a commitment to fairness. As society continues to change, so too will the expectations placed upon judges. Ensuring that judgeship remains a respected and effective institution is essential for the health of democracy and the rule of law. Thus, fostering an environment where judges can operate free from external pressures while upholding the highest standards of justice is paramount for any society that values fairness and equality before the law.

‘法官职务’的概念对于公正和公平的法律系统的运作至关重要。它体现了法官解释法律和确保正义得以实现的权威和责任。在许多民主社会中，法官的角色不仅至关重要，而且备受尊重。‘法官职务’代表了一个需要广泛法律知识、公正性和强大伦理基础的位置。法官应根据事实、证据和法律原则而非个人信仰或社会压力作出决定。 近年来，围绕‘法官职务’的讨论逐渐增加，特别是关于法官的任命和问责制。许多人认为，选择法官的过程应该是透明的，不受政治影响，因为这确保了他们可以不偏不倚地履行职责。一个公平的‘法官职务’对维护公众对司法系统的信任至关重要。当人们相信法官是基于优点而不是政治关系被选中时，他们更可能尊重和遵守法律。 此外，与‘法官职务’相关的责任不仅仅限于主持法庭案件。法官在塑造法律先例方面常常发挥关键作用，这些先例可能会影响未来的裁决。他们对法律的解释可以导致法律适用方式的重大变化，影响整个社会。因此，‘法官职务’的分量极为重要，因为它不仅影响个别案件，还影响更广泛的法律环境。 此外，处于‘法官职务’之中的挑战也不能被忽视。法官必须应对复杂的法律问题，管理法庭动态，有时还要面对公众的审视。交付公正和公平结果的压力可能是巨大的，尤其是在那些吸引媒体关注的高调案件中。这就是为什么持续的培训和教育对法官来说至关重要。他们必须随时了解法律发展和社会变化，以有效履行自己的角色。 此外，‘法官职务’的概念并不是静态的；它随着社会的价值观和期望而演变。随着社会正义、平等和人权等问题的突出，法官越来越多地被要求在决策过程中考虑这些因素。这种演变突显了拥有既了解法律又能敏锐把握裁决伦理影响的法官的重要性。 总之，‘法官职务’是法律制度的基石，体现了正义、诚信和公正的原则。法官的角色是多面的，需要对法律有深刻理解和对公平的承诺。随着社会的不断变化，法官所面临的期望也将随之改变。确保‘法官职务’仍然是一个受尊重和有效的机构，对于任何重视法律面前公平和平等的社会都是至关重要的。因此，营造一个法官能够在没有外部压力的情况下运作，同时保持最高标准的正义的环境，对于任何重视公平和法律统治的社会来说都是至关重要的。