rehashing

简明释义

英[ˈriːhæʃɪŋ]美[ˈriˌhæʃɪŋ]

n. [数]重散列；重杂凑

v. 改作；再处理（rehash 的 ing 形式）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.If Congress wants to put healthier food into school lunches, it may have to go with the bill the Senate passed last month, or risk rehashing the whole thing later and getting nothing.

假如国会有意在学校午餐中增加更有益于健康的饭菜，它就必须要遵守参议院上个月通过的议案，或者冒险改写整项议案但那将一无所获。

2.If Congress wants to put healthier food into school lunches, it may have to go with the bill the Senate passed last month, or risk rehashing the whole thing later and getting nothing.

假如国会有意在学校午餐中增加更有益于健康的饭菜，它就必须要遵守参议院上个月通过的议案，或者冒险改写整项议案但那将一无所获。

3.In response to the accusation that he is rehashing old ideas, Singer points out that the German newspaper debate got under way without him, and he was merely responding.

面对“老调重弹”的指责，辛格指出，德国报纸上的争论不是他发起的，他不过是回应而已。

4.This is why blogs are popular, not because they’re rehashing news from big media publications, writing their opinions without contributing with facts.

博客就是这么火起来的，不仅是因为它们翻写大型媒体出版物的新闻，添上他们的主观看法，而是因为有着这么一群看客热衷于讨论飞机上哪一个座位是最舒服的。

5.He isn't interested in rehashing his conversations within Microsoft or taking credit for the company's decision to release a software development kit.

对于重复和微软的对话或是对公司发行软件开发工具包的决定去居功，李并不感兴趣。

6.Digital news firms used to do little besides rehashing traditional newspapers 'stories.

数字新闻公司过去除了重复传统新闻报纸的故事之外很少写自己的东西。

7.It's not just bland sort of rehashing what we were wearing, or whatever.

这并不是乏味地对于我们的看法旧调重弹，或其他什么。

8.Beware, however, that Lua can only shrink a table when rehashing it.

注意，无论如何，Lua只能在再散列时收缩表。

9.Rehashing it here is not necessary, but I'll summarize briefly.

没有必要在这里重复讨论，不过我会简单总结一下。

10.The team is tired of constantly rehashing the same ideas in meetings.

团队厌倦了在会议上不断重新讨论相同的想法。

11.Instead of rehashing old strategies, we need to innovate and think outside the box.

我们需要创新并跳出框架，而不是重复旧策略。

12.The article was just a rehashing of previous studies without any new insights.

这篇文章只是对之前研究的重复，没有任何新的见解。

13.During the presentation, he kept rehashing points that had already been covered.

在演示过程中，他不断重申已经讨论过的要点。

14.The documentary felt like a rehashing of old footage with minimal new content.

这部纪录片感觉像是对旧素材的重复利用，几乎没有新内容。

作文

In today's fast-paced world, many individuals and organizations often resort to the practice of rehashing ideas and concepts rather than generating new ones. This phenomenon can be observed across various fields, from academia to the corporate sector, and even in creative industries such as film and music. The term rehashing refers to the act of revisiting, reinterpreting, or repackaging existing ideas without adding significant value or originality. While there are instances where revisiting old ideas can lead to innovative breakthroughs, excessive reliance on rehashing can stifle creativity and hinder progress. One prominent example of rehashing can be seen in the entertainment industry. Many films today are sequels, remakes, or adaptations of previously successful stories. While some of these adaptations bring fresh perspectives and modern interpretations, others merely recycle the same plotlines and character arcs, offering little more than nostalgia to audiences. This trend not only reflects a lack of original storytelling but also raises questions about the creative capabilities of filmmakers. Are they unable to produce original content, or are they simply playing it safe by sticking to familiar formulas? In academia, rehashing can manifest in research papers that reiterate established theories without contributing new insights. Scholars may feel pressured to publish frequently, leading them to revisit previous studies instead of exploring uncharted territories. This practice can lead to a stagnation of knowledge, as important questions remain unanswered, and innovative solutions go unexplored. The academic community must encourage researchers to pursue original ideas and challenge existing paradigms rather than simply rehashing what has already been said. The corporate world is not immune to the pitfalls of rehashing. Companies often rely on tried-and-true marketing strategies or business models that have worked in the past. While there is merit in learning from past successes, an over-reliance on rehashing can result in missed opportunities for growth and innovation. In a rapidly evolving market, businesses must adapt and reinvent themselves to stay relevant. Embracing new ideas and taking calculated risks can lead to groundbreaking products and services that resonate with consumers. Despite the drawbacks of rehashing, there are scenarios where revisiting old ideas can be beneficial. For instance, in the realm of education, teachers often build upon established pedagogical theories to enhance their teaching methods. By integrating proven strategies with new technologies and approaches, educators can create a rich learning environment that caters to diverse student needs. In this sense, rehashing can serve as a foundation for innovation, as long as it is done thoughtfully and purposefully. Ultimately, the key to avoiding the pitfalls of rehashing lies in striking a balance between honoring the past and embracing the future. Individuals and organizations should strive to draw inspiration from existing ideas while simultaneously pushing the boundaries of creativity. By fostering an environment that values originality and encourages risk-taking, we can break free from the cycle of rehashing and pave the way for true innovation. It is through this commitment to originality that we can continue to evolve and make meaningful contributions to our respective fields, ensuring that we do not become stagnant in the face of familiarity.

在当今快节奏的世界中，许多个人和组织常常倾向于对想法和概念进行重提，而不是产生新的想法。这种现象可以在各个领域观察到，从学术界到企业部门，甚至在电影和音乐等创意产业中都能看到。术语重提指的是重新审视、重新诠释或重新包装现有想法，而没有增加显著的价值或原创性。虽然有些情况下，重新审视旧想法可以导致创新突破，但过度依赖重提可能会抑制创造力并阻碍进步。 在娱乐行业中，重提的一个突出例子是许多今天的电影都是续集、翻拍或改编自以前成功的故事。虽然这些改编中的一些带来了新鲜的视角和现代的诠释，但其他的仅仅是回收相同的情节和角色弧线，给观众提供的几乎只有怀旧。这一趋势不仅反映了电影制作人缺乏原创故事讲述能力，还引发了关于他们创造能力的质疑。他们是否无法制作原创内容，还是仅仅通过坚持熟悉的公式来保持安全？ 在学术界，重提可能表现为研究论文重申已建立的理论，而没有贡献新的见解。学者们可能感到有压力频繁发表，这导致他们重访先前的研究，而不是探索未开发的领域。这种做法可能导致知识的停滞，因为重要问题仍然悬而未决，创新解决方案未被探索。学术界必须鼓励研究人员追求原创思想，并挑战现有范式，而不是简单地重提已经说过的话。 企业界也不免受到重提的陷阱困扰。公司经常依赖过去行之有效的营销策略或商业模式。尽管从过去的成功中学习是有意义的，但过度依赖重提可能导致错失增长和创新的机会。在快速发展的市场中，企业必须适应并重新发明自己，以保持相关性。拥抱新想法并采取经过深思熟虑的风险，可以导致与消费者产生共鸣的突破性产品和服务。 尽管重提存在缺点，但在某些情况下，重新审视旧想法可能是有益的。例如，在教育领域，教师通常在已有的教学理论基础上进行改进，以增强他们的教学方法。通过将经过验证的策略与新技术和方法结合，教育工作者可以创造出丰富的学习环境，满足不同学生的需求。从这个意义上讲，只要以深思熟虑和目的明确的方式进行，重提可以作为创新的基础。 最终，避免重提陷阱的关键在于在尊重过去和拥抱未来之间找到平衡。个人和组织应该努力从现有理念中汲取灵感，同时推动创造力的边界。通过营造重视原创性和鼓励冒险的环境，我们可以打破重提的循环，为真正的创新铺平道路。正是通过对原创性的承诺，我们才能继续发展，并为各自的领域做出有意义的贡献，确保我们在熟悉面前不会停滞不前。