repressively

简明释义

英[rɪˈpresɪvli]美[rɪˈpresɪvli]

镇压地

专制地

压抑地

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The real power is retained at the centre and used repressively.

真正的权力被保留在中央，并被专制地使用。

2.The real power is retained at the centre and used repressively.

真正的权力被保留在中央，并被专制地使用。

3.The government ruled repressively, limiting freedom of speech and assembly.

政府以压制性地统治，限制言论和集会自由。

4.In the novel, the society was depicted as repressively controlling its citizens' thoughts.

在小说中，这个社会被描绘为压制性地控制公民的思想。

5.Her parents raised her repressively, enforcing strict rules that stifled her creativity.

她的父母以压制性地方式抚养她，强加严格的规则，扼杀了她的创造力。

6.The regime operated repressively, using fear tactics to maintain control over the population.

该政权以压制性地方式运作，利用恐惧战术来维持对人民的控制。

7.He spoke repressively about the need for more discipline in the classroom.

他以压制性地口吻谈论教室里需要更多的纪律。

作文

In today's world, the concept of freedom is often taken for granted. People in many countries enjoy the right to express their opinions, practice their beliefs, and live their lives without fear of oppression. However, there are still places where such freedoms are curtailed, and individuals face severe consequences for speaking out. In these environments, governments often rule repressively (压制地), stifling dissent and discouraging any form of opposition. This raises important questions about the nature of power and the responsibilities that come with it. Historically, societies that have ruled repressively (压制地) have faced significant backlash from their citizens. For instance, during the 20th century, many authoritarian regimes employed brutal tactics to maintain control over their populations. These governments used censorship, surveillance, and violence to ensure that any voices of dissent were silenced. The impact of such repressive measures was profound, leading to widespread fear and a culture of silence among the populace. In contrast, democratic societies tend to thrive on open dialogue and the exchange of ideas. When people are allowed to express themselves freely, innovation flourishes, and social progress is made. The contrast between these two types of governance highlights the dangers of ruling repressively (压制地) and the importance of protecting individual rights. It is essential for citizens to remain vigilant and advocate for their freedoms, ensuring that their governments do not overstep their bounds. The psychological effects of living under a repressively (压制地) governed regime can be devastating. Individuals may experience anxiety, depression, and a sense of hopelessness when they feel that their voices cannot be heard. Furthermore, the societal implications are equally concerning; when people are afraid to speak up, communities become fragmented, and trust erodes. This can lead to a cycle of repression, where fear perpetuates silence, and silence allows oppression to continue unchecked. Moreover, the rise of technology has created new avenues for both oppression and resistance. While some governments use digital surveillance to monitor their citizens and suppress dissent repressively (压制地), activists have also found ways to leverage technology to organize, communicate, and raise awareness about injustices. Social media platforms, for example, have become powerful tools for mobilizing movements and sharing information, even in the face of governmental efforts to stifle free expression. In conclusion, the implications of ruling repressively (压制地) extend far beyond the immediate suppression of dissent. It affects the very fabric of society, influencing mental health, community cohesion, and the potential for progress. As global citizens, we must recognize the importance of safeguarding our rights and advocating for those who live under oppressive regimes. Only by fostering an environment of openness and dialogue can we hope to combat the dangers of repression and build a more just and equitable world.

在当今世界，自由的概念常常被视为理所当然。许多国家的人们享有表达意见、实践信仰和生活的权利，而不必担心压迫。然而，仍然有一些地方，这些自由受到限制，个人因发声而面临严重后果。在这些环境中，政府往往以压制地（repressively）统治，窒息异议，打击任何形式的反对。这引发了关于权力本质及其伴随责任的重要问题。 历史上，那些以压制地（repressively）方式统治的社会往往会遭到公民的强烈反击。例如，在20世纪，许多威权主义政权采用残酷手段来维持对其人民的控制。这些政府使用审查、监视和暴力来确保任何异议声音都被压制。这种压制性措施的影响深远，导致了普遍的恐惧和公众文化的沉默。 相比之下，民主社会往往依赖于开放的对话和思想交流。当人们能够自由表达自己时，创新蓬勃发展，社会进步得以实现。这两种治理方式之间的对比突显了以压制地（repressively）方式统治的危险性以及保护个人权利的重要性。公民必须保持警惕，倡导自己的自由，确保政府不越过界限。 生活在一个压制地（repressively）治理的政权下的心理影响可能是毁灭性的。当个人感到自己的声音无法被听到时，他们可能会经历焦虑、抑郁和无助感。此外，社会层面的影响同样令人担忧；当人们害怕发声时，社区变得支离破碎，信任崩溃。这可能导致压制的循环，恐惧延续沉默，而沉默又使压迫得以继续不受遏制。 此外，技术的兴起创造了新的压迫和抵抗途径。虽然一些政府利用数字监控来监视公民并以压制地（repressively）方式镇压异议，但活动家也找到了利用技术组织、沟通和提高对不公正现象认识的方法。例如，社交媒体平台已成为动员运动和分享信息的强大工具，即使在政府努力压制自由表达的情况下。 总之，以压制地（repressively）方式统治的影响远远超出对异议的直接压制。它影响社会的基本结构，影响心理健康、社区凝聚力和进步的潜力。作为全球公民，我们必须认识到保护我们的权利和倡导生活在压迫政权下的人们的重要性。只有通过营造开放和对话的环境，我们才能希望对抗压制的危险，建设一个更加公正和平等的世界。