pedantically

简明释义

英[pɪˈdæntɪkli]美[pɪˈdæntɪkli]

adv. 卖弄学问地；学究式地，迂腐地

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.If " a belief in ghosts" sounds too old-fashioned or superstitious, call it, more pedantically, a belief in the autonomous character of the unconscious. The two are the same.

假如相信鬼魂听起来未免过时或迷信，换个掉书袋子的说法，就是相信潜意识的自主特性。两者是相同的。

2.If " a belief in ghosts" sounds too old-fashioned or superstitious, call it, more pedantically, a belief in the autonomous character of the unconscious. The two are the same.

假如相信鬼魂听起来未免过时或迷信，换个掉书袋子的说法，就是相信潜意识的自主特性。两者是相同的。

3."Exactly!" said Xenophilius, his forefinger raised pedantically. "the sign of the Deathly Hallows on Ignotus's grave is conclusive proof!"

“完全正确！”谢诺菲留斯说，学究气地扬了扬食指，“伊格诺图斯墓碑上死亡圣器的标志是有力的证据！”

4.He explained the rules of the game pedantically, making sure every detail was covered.

他拘泥于细节地解释了游戏规则，确保每个细节都被涵盖。

5.The teacher pedantically corrected every minor mistake in the students' essays.

老师一丝不苟地纠正了学生论文中的每一个小错误。

6.During the meeting, she pedantically pointed out the exact wording in the contract.

在会议中，她逐字逐句地指出合同中的确切措辞。

7.He tends to speak pedantically about grammar, which can be quite annoying.

他在语法方面总是过于讲究，这可能会让人感到烦恼。

8.The professor pedantically emphasized the importance of citing sources correctly.

教授一本正经地强调了正确引用来源的重要性。

作文

In the realm of education, there is often a fine line between thoroughness and over-explanation. Some educators approach their teaching methods with a focus on precision, ensuring that every detail is covered. However, this can sometimes lead to a style of instruction that is overly meticulous and, at times, even tedious. When a teacher explains concepts too pedantically, they risk losing the interest of their students. The term pedantically refers to an excessive concern for minor details or rules, which can detract from the overall understanding of the subject matter. For instance, consider a mathematics teacher who spends an entire lesson discussing the minute differences between similar formulas. While it is important to understand these distinctions, if the teacher goes on for too long without allowing students to engage in practical applications of the formulas, the students may become disengaged. They might feel overwhelmed by the intricacies of the topic rather than inspired to learn. Moreover, when discussions are held pedantically, participants may find themselves caught up in trivial arguments about definitions or specific terminology instead of focusing on the broader concepts at hand. This can be particularly evident in academic settings where debates are common. If scholars become too pedantically fixated on precise wording, they may miss the opportunity for meaningful dialogue and collaboration. In literature, we also see examples of pedantic writing. Authors who focus excessively on elaborate vocabulary and complex sentence structures may alienate their readers. While it's admirable to strive for eloquence, writing should ultimately serve to communicate ideas clearly and effectively. A story that is bogged down by pedantic language can lose its emotional impact and fail to resonate with its audience. Conversely, there are situations where being pedantic may be beneficial. In fields such as law or science, precision is crucial. Legal documents require exact wording to ensure that interpretations are clear and unambiguous. Similarly, scientific research must adhere to strict protocols and definitions to validate findings. In these contexts, a pedantic approach can enhance clarity and prevent misunderstandings. Ultimately, the challenge lies in finding a balance. Educators and communicators must strive to convey information effectively without becoming overly pedantic. Engaging students in discussions, encouraging questions, and fostering an environment where curiosity is valued can help mitigate the risks associated with a pedantic approach. By focusing on the bigger picture while still addressing important details, we can create a more dynamic and enriching learning experience. In conclusion, while the term pedantically highlights the potential pitfalls of excessive detail orientation, it also serves as a reminder of the importance of clarity and engagement in communication. Whether in teaching, writing, or discussion, striking the right balance between thoroughness and accessibility is key to effective learning and understanding. We should always aim to inspire curiosity rather than stifle it with an overly pedantic attitude.

在教育领域，往往存在一条微妙的界限，区分彻底性与过度解释。一些教育工作者以精确为重点，确保每个细节都被覆盖。然而，这有时会导致一种过于细致、甚至乏味的教学风格。当老师过于pedantically地解释概念时，他们可能会失去学生的兴趣。术语pedantically指的是对细微细节或规则的过度关注，这可能会削弱对主题整体理解的能力。 例如，考虑一位数学老师，他花整整一节课讨论相似公式之间的微小差异。虽然理解这些区别很重要，但如果老师讲解得过于冗长，而不允许学生参与公式的实际应用，学生可能会感到无聊。他们可能会因为主题的复杂性而感到不知所措，而不是受到学习的启发。 此外，当讨论以pedantically的方式进行时，参与者可能会陷入对定义或特定术语的琐碎争论中，而不是专注于手头更广泛的概念。这在学术环境中尤为明显，因为辩论是常见的。如果学者们过于pedantically地关注精确的措辞，他们可能会错过有意义的对话与合作的机会。 在文学中，我们也可以看到pedantic写作的例子。那些过于关注华丽词汇和复杂句结构的作者可能会让读者感到疏远。虽然追求优雅是值得赞赏的，但写作最终应服务于清晰有效地传达思想。被pedantic语言拖累的故事可能会失去情感冲击力，无法引起观众的共鸣。 然而，在某些情况下，pedantic的态度可能是有益的。在法律或科学等领域，精确性至关重要。法律文件需要准确的措辞，以确保解释清晰且明确。同样，科学研究必须遵循严格的协议和定义，以验证发现。在这些背景下，pedantic的方法可以增强清晰度，防止误解。 最终，挑战在于找到平衡。教育者和传播者必须努力有效地传达信息，而不至于变得过于pedantic。通过吸引学生参与讨论、鼓励提问以及营造一个重视好奇心的环境，可以帮助减轻与pedantic方法相关的风险。通过关注大局，同时仍然处理重要细节，我们可以创造一个更具活力和丰富的学习体验。 总之，尽管术语pedantically突显了过度关注细节取向的潜在陷阱，但它也提醒我们在沟通中清晰性和参与感的重要性。无论是在教学、写作还是讨论中，找到彻底性与可接近性之间的正确平衡是有效学习和理解的关键。我们应该始终旨在激发好奇心，而不是用过于pedantic的态度来抑制它。