apanage

简明释义

英[ˈæpənɪdʒ]美[æˈpənɪdʒ]

n. 属地；封地

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Their tangible resources are managed on apanage principle, but their intangible resources are mutual and have communal property rights.

它们的有形资源可以按照属地原则进行管理，无形资源却是共有的，具有社团产权的特征。

2.Their tangible resources are managed on apanage principle, but their intangible resources are mutual and have communal property rights.

它们的有形资源可以按照属地原则进行管理，无形资源却是共有的，具有社团产权的特征。

3.Cannot. Must deal with to branch of apanage labor safeguard first "labor manual".

不能。必须先到属地劳动保障部门办理《劳动手册》。

4.Be in only oneself "apanage" in search joyous, he just has safe feeling most.

只有在自己的“属地”里寻欢，他才最有安全感。

5.The royal family received a substantial amount of money as an apanage.

皇室家庭获得了一笔可观的资金作为俸禄。

6.In many monarchies, the title of prince comes with an apanage to support their lifestyle.

在许多君主制国家，王子的头衔附带有一个俸禄来支持他们的生活方式。

7.The government allocated funds for the apanage of the newly appointed ambassador.

政府为新任大使的俸禄拨款。

8.Historically, the apanage was often granted to younger sons of nobility.

历史上，俸禄通常授予贵族的幼子。

9.He relied on his family's apanage to fund his education abroad.

他依靠家族的俸禄来资助自己在国外的教育。

作文

In the realm of history and politics, the term apanage refers to a grant of land or property that is given to a younger son or a member of the royal family, often to ensure their financial independence without entitling them to the throne. This practice was particularly prevalent in feudal societies where lineage and inheritance played a crucial role in maintaining power dynamics. The significance of apanage can be observed through various historical examples, illustrating how it served both as a means of rewarding loyalty and managing the complexities of royal succession. One notable instance of apanage can be seen in the French monarchy, where younger sons of kings were often given territories to govern. This not only provided them with a source of income but also helped to solidify their loyalty to the crown. By granting these lands, the king could prevent potential rivalries that might arise from ambitious younger siblings who might otherwise seek to claim the throne for themselves. In this sense, apanage acted as a strategic tool for maintaining stability within the kingdom. Moreover, the concept of apanage extends beyond mere financial support; it also encompasses the responsibilities that come with governance. Those who received such grants were expected to manage the lands effectively, ensuring the welfare of their subjects. This created a system where loyalty and duty were intertwined, as the recipients of apanage were compelled to demonstrate their worthiness through good governance. The implications of apanage can also be seen in the context of social hierarchy. The distribution of lands among royal family members reinforced the class structure of the time, where nobility held significant power over the common populace. This hierarchical system often led to conflicts, as those who felt marginalized or overlooked by the allocation of apanage might resort to rebellion or dissent. Thus, while apanage was intended to maintain order, it sometimes had the opposite effect, highlighting the delicate balance between reward and resentment. In contemporary times, the concept of apanage has evolved, yet its essence remains relevant in discussions about wealth distribution and privilege. The idea that certain individuals are granted advantages based on their lineage or familial connections resonates in modern society, where discussions about inherited wealth and social mobility continue to provoke debate. While the explicit practice of apanage may no longer exist, the underlying principles of favoritism and entitlement persist, prompting us to reflect on the fairness of our own systems. Ultimately, understanding apanage provides valuable insights into the historical mechanisms of power and privilege. It reminds us that the legacies of the past shape our present realities, influencing how we perceive authority and wealth. As we navigate our contemporary landscape, recognizing the remnants of apanage in our societal structures can foster a deeper awareness of the ongoing challenges related to equity and justice. In conclusion, the study of apanage not only enriches our comprehension of history but also invites us to critically examine the dynamics of power that continue to affect our lives today.

在历史和政治领域，术语apanage指的是给予年轻儿子或王室成员的土地或财产的授予，通常是为了确保他们的经济独立，而不赋予他们继承王位的权利。这种做法在封建社会中尤为普遍，其中血统和继承在维持权力动态方面发挥了至关重要的作用。通过各种历史实例，可以观察到apanage的重要性，说明它既作为奖励忠诚的手段，又作为管理王位继承复杂性的工具。 一个显著的例子是法国君主制，在那里，国王的年轻儿子们常常被授予领土进行统治。这不仅为他们提供了收入来源，还帮助巩固了他们对王权的忠诚。通过授予这些土地，国王可以防止潜在的竞争，因为有雄心壮志的弟弟们可能会寻求声称王位。从这个意义上说，apanage作为维护王国稳定的战略工具。 此外，apanage的概念不仅仅涉及经济支持，它还包括治理所带来的责任。那些接受这种授予的人被期望有效管理土地，确保其臣民的福祉。这创造了一个忠诚和责任交织的系统，因为接受apanage的人被迫通过良好的治理来证明他们的价值。 apanage的影响在社会等级结构的背景下也得到了体现。王室成员之间的土地分配强化了当时的阶级结构，贵族对普通民众拥有显著的权力。这种等级制度常常导致冲突，因为那些感到被边缘化或被忽视的人可能会因apanage的分配而反叛或不满。因此，虽然apanage旨在维护秩序，但有时却产生了相反的效果，突显了奖励与怨恨之间微妙的平衡。 在当代，apanage的概念已经演变，但其本质在关于财富分配和特权的讨论中仍然相关。某些个人基于其血统或家庭关系获得优势的想法在现代社会中引起共鸣，在这里，关于继承财富和社会流动性的讨论继续引发辩论。尽管显性实践的apanage可能不再存在，但偏袒和特权的基本原则依然存在，促使我们反思自身系统的公平性。 最终，理解apanage为我们提供了对权力和特权历史机制的宝贵见解。它提醒我们，过去的遗产塑造了我们的现实，影响了我们如何看待权威和财富。当我们在当代环境中航行时，认识到apanage在我们社会结构中的残余，可以促进我们对与公平和正义相关的持续挑战的更深刻认识。总之，研究apanage不仅丰富了我们对历史的理解，还邀请我们批判性地审视继续影响我们生活的权力动态。