autarchic

简明释义

英[ɔːˈtɑːkɪk]美[ɔːˈtɑːrkɪk]

adj. 独裁的；专制国家的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The country's leadership adopted an autarchic policy to reduce dependency on foreign imports.

该国的领导层采取了一项自给自足的政策，以减少对外国进口的依赖。

2.In an autarchic economy, the government controls all production and distribution of goods.

在一个自给自足的经济中，政府控制所有商品的生产和分配。

3.The historian noted that the autarchic nature of the regime led to widespread poverty.

历史学家指出，该政权的自给自足的性质导致了广泛的贫困。

4.During the war, the nation became increasingly autarchic to sustain its economy.

在战争期间，该国变得越来越自给自足以维持其经济。

5.The leader believed that an autarchic approach would foster national pride.

领导者认为，自给自足的方法将促进民族自豪感。

作文

In the modern world, nations often find themselves navigating a complex web of interdependence. This interconnectedness can sometimes lead to a desire for greater control over their own economic destinies. One term that encapsulates this concept is autarchic, which refers to a system or policy of economic self-sufficiency. An autarchic approach implies that a nation aims to minimize its reliance on external resources and strives to produce everything it needs within its own borders. While this may sound appealing, the implications of adopting an autarchic strategy can be both positive and negative. Historically, several countries have pursued autarchic policies in response to external pressures, such as sanctions or trade disputes. For instance, during the early years of the Soviet Union, leaders implemented autarchic strategies to achieve rapid industrialization and reduce dependence on Western economies. This led to significant advancements in certain sectors, but it also resulted in inefficiencies and shortages in others. The drive for self-sufficiency often meant that the country became less competitive on the global stage, unable to benefit from the advantages of international trade. In contrast, some argue that an autarchic model can foster innovation and resilience. By focusing on local production and consumption, nations can develop unique industries tailored to their specific needs and resources. This can create jobs, stimulate local economies, and promote a sense of national pride. Moreover, in times of global crises, such as pandemics or geopolitical tensions, an autarchic approach can provide a buffer against external shocks, ensuring that a country can sustain itself without relying heavily on imports. However, the drawbacks of an autarchic strategy cannot be overlooked. The pursuit of complete self-sufficiency can lead to isolationism, limiting a nation's ability to engage with the global economy. This can stifle innovation and growth, as countries miss out on the benefits of trade, foreign investment, and technological exchange. Additionally, maintaining an autarchic economy often requires significant government intervention, which can lead to inefficiencies and corruption. The debate surrounding autarchic policies is particularly relevant today, as we witness shifts in global trade dynamics. As nations grapple with the consequences of globalization, there is a growing interest in balancing self-sufficiency with the benefits of international cooperation. Countries must carefully consider how much they wish to embrace an autarchic approach while still engaging with the global community. In conclusion, the term autarchic offers a lens through which we can examine the complexities of national economic policies. While the idea of self-sufficiency holds appeal, it is essential to weigh the potential benefits against the risks of isolation and inefficiency. As nations navigate an increasingly interconnected world, finding the right balance between autarchic practices and global engagement will be crucial for sustainable development and prosperity. Ultimately, the choice between self-sufficiency and interdependence will shape the future of economies around the globe.

在现代世界中，各国常常发现自己在复杂的相互依存网络中航行。这种互联性有时会导致对更大控制自己经济命运的渴望。一个能很好地概括这一概念的术语是autarchic，它指的是一种经济自给自足的体系或政策。autarchic方法意味着一个国家旨在尽量减少对外部资源的依赖，努力在自己的边界内生产所需的一切。虽然这听起来很有吸引力，但采用autarchic战略的影响可能是积极的，也可能是消极的。 历史上，一些国家曾因外部压力（如制裁或贸易争端）而追求autarchic政策。例如，在苏联早期，领导者实施了autarchic战略，以实现快速工业化并减少对西方经济的依赖。这导致某些领域的显著进步，但在其他领域也造成了低效和短缺。追求自给自足往往意味着该国在全球舞台上的竞争力下降，无法从国际贸易的优势中受益。 相反，有人认为autarchic模式可以促进创新和韧性。通过关注地方生产和消费，国家可以发展出适合其特定需求和资源的独特产业。这可以创造就业机会，刺激地方经济，并促进民族自豪感。此外，在全球危机时期，例如疫情或地缘政治紧张局势下，autarchic方法可以提供抵御外部冲击的缓冲，确保一个国家能够在不严重依赖进口的情况下维持自身。 然而，autarchic战略的缺点不容忽视。追求完全自给自足可能导致孤立主义，限制一个国家与全球经济的互动能力。这可能抑制创新和增长，因为国家错过了贸易、外国投资和技术交流的好处。此外，维持autarchic经济通常需要政府的重大干预，这可能导致低效率和腐败。 围绕autarchic政策的辩论在今天尤其相关，因为我们目睹全球贸易动态的变化。随着各国应对全球化的后果，越来越多的人对在自给自足与国际合作之间取得平衡产生兴趣。各国必须仔细考虑他们希望在多大程度上拥抱autarchic方法，同时仍然与全球社会互动。 总之，术语autarchic为我们提供了一个透镜，通过这个透镜我们可以审视国家经济政策的复杂性。虽然自给自足的理念具有吸引力，但权衡潜在利益与孤立和低效风险至关重要。随着各国在日益互联的世界中航行，找到自给自足实践与全球参与之间的正确平衡对于可持续发展和繁荣至关重要。最终，自给自足与相互依存之间的选择将塑造全球经济的未来。