autarky

简明释义

英[ˈɔːtɑːki]美[ˈɔtɑrki]

n. 自给自足

复 数 a u t a r k i e s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.There have been many examples of closed economies throughout history, but very few closed economies exist today. also called autarky.

这种经济也可称为“自给自足的经济”，在历史上有很多例子，但是在现代经济中很少见。

2.There have been many examples of closed economies throughout history, but very few closed economies exist today. also called autarky.

这种经济也可称为“自给自足的经济”，在历史上有很多例子，但是在现代经济中很少见。

3.The reactions of some western countries to successive currency and energy disorders have resurrected the spectre of autarky.

某些西方国家对接连发生的货币与能源方面失调的反应又使自给自足政策的幽灵复活了。

4.Pakistanis' growing sense of autarky has led them to overplay their hand in negotiations with the United States.

巴基斯坦日益增强的自给自足意识使得他们在同美国谈判时过高地估计了自己。

5.The country aimed for autarky to reduce its dependency on foreign imports.

这个国家旨在实现自给自足，以减少对外国进口的依赖。

6.During the economic crisis, many nations turned to autarky as a means of survival.

在经济危机期间，许多国家转向自给自足作为生存手段。

7.The government's policy of autarky led to increased local production.

政府的自给自足政策导致了地方生产的增加。

8.Some argue that autarky can lead to inefficiencies in resource allocation.

一些人认为自给自足可能导致资源配置的低效。

9.The concept of autarky is often associated with totalitarian regimes.

概念上的自给自足通常与极权政权相关联。

作文

In recent years, the concept of autarky has gained attention in discussions about economic independence and self-sufficiency. Autarky (自给自足) refers to an economic system in which a country or region aims to be self-sufficient, minimizing reliance on international trade. This idea can be traced back to ancient times when communities relied on local resources for their sustenance and development. However, in today's globalized world, the viability and practicality of autarky are often debated. One of the primary arguments in favor of autarky is the desire for economic independence. Countries that pursue autarky seek to reduce their vulnerability to global market fluctuations and geopolitical tensions. For instance, during times of crisis, such as pandemics or wars, nations that have invested in self-sufficiency may fare better than those heavily reliant on imports. This was evident during the COVID-19 pandemic when many countries faced shortages of essential goods due to disrupted supply chains. Nations like China and India, which have focused on increasing domestic production, were able to mitigate some of the impacts of these disruptions. However, achieving true autarky is fraught with challenges. The modern economy is intricately linked through trade, and complete self-sufficiency may not only be impractical but also detrimental. For example, certain resources, such as oil and rare minerals, are not available in all countries, making it impossible for them to achieve autarky. Additionally, the specialization of labor and comparative advantage suggest that countries should focus on what they do best and trade with others for the rest. This interdependence fosters innovation, efficiency, and economic growth, which could be hindered by a strict adherence to autarky. Moreover, pursuing autarky can lead to isolationism, which may have social and political ramifications. Countries that withdraw from global markets may find themselves at odds with international norms and standards, potentially leading to conflicts. For instance, North Korea has attempted to establish a form of autarky but has faced severe economic sanctions and international isolation as a result. This raises questions about the sustainability of such a model in a world that increasingly values cooperation and collaboration. In conclusion, while the idea of autarky presents an appealing vision of self-sufficiency and independence, it is essential to consider the complexities of the modern economy. A balanced approach that encourages domestic production while engaging in international trade may offer a more sustainable path forward. As we navigate the challenges of globalization, it is crucial to learn from history and recognize that complete autarky may not be the answer, but rather a nuanced strategy that embraces both self-sufficiency and interconnectedness. Ultimately, the goal should be to create resilient economies that can withstand shocks while still benefiting from the advantages of global trade.

近年来，自给自足的概念在关于经济独立和自给自足的讨论中引起了关注。自给自足（autarky）指的是一种经济体系，其中一个国家或地区旨在实现自给自足，尽量减少对国际贸易的依赖。这个理念可以追溯到古代，当时社区依靠当地资源来维持生计和发展。然而，在当今全球化的世界中，自给自足的可行性和实用性常常被辩论。 支持自给自足的主要论点之一是对经济独立的渴望。追求自给自足的国家试图减少对全球市场波动和地缘政治紧张局势的脆弱性。例如，在危机时期，例如疫情或战争，投资于自给自足的国家可能会比那些严重依赖进口的国家表现得更好。这在COVID-19大流行期间显而易见，当时许多国家因供应链中断而面临基本商品短缺的问题。像中国和印度这样的国家，专注于增加国内生产，能够减轻这些干扰的一些影响。 然而，实现真正的自给自足面临着许多挑战。现代经济通过贸易紧密相连，完全的自给自足不仅可能不切实际，而且可能有害。例如，某些资源，如石油和稀有矿物，并不是所有国家都能获得的，这使得它们无法实现自给自足。此外，劳动的专业化和比较优势表明，各国应专注于自身最擅长的领域，并与他国进行贸易以获取其他产品。这种相互依赖促进了创新、效率和经济增长，而严格遵循自给自足可能会阻碍这些进程。 此外，追求自给自足可能导致孤立主义，这可能会带来社会和政治上的后果。那些从全球市场撤退的国家可能会发现自己与国际规范和标准相抵触，从而可能导致冲突。例如，北朝鲜试图建立一种形式的自给自足，但因此面临严厉的经济制裁和国际孤立。这引发了关于这种模式在一个日益重视合作与协作的世界中的可持续性的问题。 总之，虽然自给自足的理念展现了自给自足和独立的迷人愿景，但考虑现代经济的复杂性至关重要。鼓励国内生产的同时参与国际贸易的平衡方法可能提供了一条更可持续的前进道路。在我们应对全球化挑战的过程中，重要的是从历史中学习，并认识到完全的自给自足可能不是答案，而是一种包容自给自足和相互联系的细致战略。最终，目标应是创造能够承受冲击的韧性经济，同时仍能从全球贸易的优势中受益。