authoritarian

简明释义

英[ɔːˌθɒrɪˈteəriən]美[əˌθɔːrəˈteriən]

adj. 独裁主义的；权力主义的

n. 权力主义者；独裁主义者

复 数 a u t h o r i t a r i a n s

比 较 级 m o r e a u t h o r i t a r i a n

最 高 级 m o s t a u t h o r i t a r i a n

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.No one explicitly called the current principal an authoritarian busybody, but that was the obvious implication.

没人明确地说现在的校长好管闲事，但是暗示意义已经很明显了。

2.Senior officers could be considering a coup to restore authoritarian rule.

高级军官们可能会考虑发动一场政变来恢复独裁统治。

3.It is one response to an authoritarian parenting style.

拖拉症甚至也可能是一种叛逆的表现。

4.Those who benefit most from the status quo are naturally the least interested in change, and they find Allies in the fearful and the authoritarian.

从现状得益最多的人自然是最不希望改变的，他们与畏首畏尾者还有权威主义者结成联盟。

5.My father was a strict authoritarian.

我父亲是绝对的权力主义者。

6.In the novel "Wowen in Love", Laurence created a typical example of the authoritarian personality. Gerald Crich.

在长篇小说《恋爱中的女人》中，劳伦斯塑造了一位权威人格的典型代表—杰拉尔德·克里克。

7.The government has implemented an authoritarian 专制的 regime that limits personal freedoms.

政府实施了一个限制个人自由的authoritarian 专制的政权。

8.Many citizens are unhappy with the authoritarian 专制的 leadership style of their president.

许多公民对他们总统的authoritarian 专制的领导风格感到不满。

9.The authoritarian 专制的 approach to governance has sparked protests across the country.

这种authoritarian 专制的治理方式引发了全国范围内的抗议活动。

10.In an authoritarian 专制的 state, dissent is often met with harsh penalties.

在一个authoritarian 专制的国家，异议者常常会受到严厉的惩罚。

11.The authoritarian 专制的 regime controls the media to suppress any opposing views.

这个authoritarian 专制的政权控制媒体以压制任何反对意见。

作文

In today's world, the concept of governance is often debated, particularly in relation to different political systems. One such system that has garnered significant attention is the authoritarian (专制的) regime. An authoritarian (专制的) government is characterized by the concentration of power in a leader or an elite group, where individual freedoms are often suppressed in favor of state control. This essay aims to explore the implications of authoritarian (专制的) governance on society, its advantages, and its disadvantages. One of the primary features of an authoritarian (专制的) regime is the lack of political pluralism. In such systems, opposition parties are often banned, and dissent is not tolerated. This can lead to a stable government, as decisions can be made quickly without the need for extensive debate or compromise. For example, countries with authoritarian (专制的) leadership may respond more swiftly to crises, such as natural disasters or economic downturns, compared to democracies where bureaucratic processes can delay action. However, the suppression of dissent and the lack of political freedom associated with authoritarian (专制的) regimes can stifle innovation and progress. When citizens are not allowed to express their opinions freely, it can lead to a culture of fear, where individuals are hesitant to voice their concerns or challenge the status quo. This environment can hinder social and technological advancements, as creativity often thrives in open and free societies. Moreover, authoritarian (专制的) governments often justify their actions by claiming to maintain order and stability. While this may be true in some cases, it can also lead to human rights abuses. Citizens living under authoritarian (专制的) rule may face arbitrary detention, censorship, and even violence from the state. The lack of accountability in these systems means that leaders can act with impunity, leading to widespread corruption and abuse of power. On the other hand, some argue that authoritarian (专制的) regimes can achieve economic growth more effectively than democratic governments. By implementing policies without the need for public approval, these governments can pursue long-term strategies that may benefit the economy. For instance, countries like China have experienced rapid economic development under an authoritarian (专制的) regime, lifting millions out of poverty. However, this raises the question of whether economic growth is worth the cost of personal freedoms and human rights. In conclusion, the implications of authoritarian (专制的) governance are complex and multifaceted. While such regimes may offer stability and rapid decision-making, they often come at the expense of individual freedoms and human rights. As global citizens, it is essential to critically assess the impact of authoritarian (专制的) rule on society and consider the value of democratic principles that promote freedom, justice, and equality. The balance between security and liberty remains a pivotal discussion in the ongoing evolution of governance worldwide.

在当今世界，治理的概念常常受到争论，特别是与不同的政治体系有关。其中一个引起广泛关注的体系就是authoritarian（专制的）政权。authoritarian（专制的）政府的特点是权力集中在领导者或精英集团手中，个人自由往往被压制，以维护国家控制。本文旨在探讨authoritarian（专制的）治理对社会的影响、其优点和缺点。 authoritarian（专制的）政权的主要特征之一是缺乏政治多元化。在这样的体系中，反对党通常被禁止，异议不被容忍。这可能导致政府的稳定，因为决策可以在没有广泛辩论或妥协的情况下迅速做出。例如，与民主国家相比，authoritarian（专制的）领导的国家可能会更迅速地应对危机，例如自然灾害或经济衰退，因为官僚程序可能会延迟行动。 然而，authoritarian（专制的）政权所带来的异议压制和缺乏政治自由可能会抑制创新和进步。当公民不能自由表达意见时，可能会导致一种恐惧文化，个人对表达担忧或挑战现状感到犹豫。这种环境可能会阻碍社会和技术的进步，因为创造力通常在开放和自由的社会中蓬勃发展。 此外，authoritarian（专制的）政府常常通过声称维持秩序和稳定来为其行为辩护。虽然在某些情况下这可能是正确的，但也可能导致人权侵犯。生活在authoritarian（专制的）统治下的公民可能面临任意拘留、审查甚至来自国家的暴力。这些体系中缺乏问责制意味着领导者可以肆无忌惮地行事，导致广泛的腐败和权力滥用。 另一方面，一些人认为authoritarian（专制的）政权能够比民主政府更有效地实现经济增长。通过实施不需要公众批准的政策，这些政府可以追求可能有利于经济的长期战略。例如，中国在authoritarian（专制的）政权下经历了快速的经济发展，使数百万人摆脱贫困。然而，这引发了一个问题，即经济增长是否值得以个人自由和人权为代价。 总之，authoritarian（专制的）治理的影响是复杂而多面的。虽然这样的政权可能提供稳定和快速的决策，但往往以牺牲个人自由和人权为代价。作为全球公民，我们必须批判性地评估authoritarian（专制的）统治对社会的影响，并考虑促进自由、正义和平等的民主原则的价值。安全与自由之间的平衡仍然是全球治理演变中的一个关键讨论。