authoritatively

简明释义

英[ɔːˈθɒrətətɪvli]美[əˈθɔːrəteɪtɪvli]

adv. 权威地；命令式地；可信地

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1."Look, I'm having a stroke," Maloney told the doctor authoritatively.

“我中风了，”马宏升对医生说。

2."Look, I'm having a stroke," Maloney told the doctor authoritatively.

“我中风了，”马宏升对医生说。

3.The professor spoke authoritatively about the subject, demonstrating her extensive knowledge.

教授权威地谈论这个主题，展示了她的广博知识。

4.He presented the findings authoritatively, convincing everyone of their validity.

他权威地展示了研究结果，使每个人都相信其有效性。

5.The coach gave instructions authoritatively, ensuring the team understood the game plan.

教练权威地给出指示，确保球队理解比赛计划。

6.She answered the questions authoritatively, leaving no room for doubt.

她权威地回答了问题，没有留下任何怀疑的余地。

7.The manual is written authoritatively, making it easy to follow.

手册是权威地编写的，使其易于遵循。

作文

In today's world, where information is abundant and easily accessible, the ability to discern credible sources from unreliable ones has become increasingly important. This skill is particularly crucial for students, as they are often tasked with conducting research and presenting findings. To navigate this complex landscape, one must learn to evaluate sources authoritatively (权威地) and develop a strong understanding of what constitutes reliable information. One of the primary aspects of evaluating sources is to consider the author's credentials. An author who has extensive experience or education in a particular field is more likely to provide information that can be trusted. For instance, if a student is writing a paper on climate change, they should seek out articles written by climatologists or environmental scientists, rather than opinion pieces from general publications. By relying on experts who can speak authoritatively (权威地) about their subject matter, students can ensure that their work is grounded in established knowledge. Moreover, it is essential to assess the publication in which the information appears. Peer-reviewed journals, for example, undergo rigorous scrutiny before publication, making them a reliable source of information. In contrast, blogs or personal websites may not adhere to the same standards of accuracy and reliability. When students cite sources that are published in reputable outlets, they bolster their arguments and present their ideas authoritatively (权威地). This not only enhances their credibility but also helps them engage more effectively with their audience. Another critical factor in evaluating sources is the presence of citations and references. A well-researched article will typically include a bibliography or footnotes, allowing readers to trace the origins of the information presented. This transparency is vital for establishing trust and reliability. When students use sources that are well-cited, they can present their arguments authoritatively (权威地), backed by evidence and established research. Additionally, the date of publication is an important consideration. In fields such as technology and medicine, information can quickly become outdated. Therefore, students should prioritize recent studies and data to ensure their work reflects the latest developments. By doing so, they can argue their points authoritatively (权威地), demonstrating that their conclusions are based on the most current understanding of the topic. Lastly, students should cultivate critical thinking skills to analyze the information they encounter. This involves questioning the motives behind a piece of writing, considering potential biases, and recognizing the difference between fact and opinion. By approaching their research with a critical eye, students can sift through the noise and identify sources that offer genuine insight. As a result, their own work will carry more weight and be presented authoritatively (权威地), reflecting a deep engagement with the subject matter. In conclusion, the ability to evaluate sources authoritatively (权威地) is an essential skill for students in an age of information overload. By considering the author's expertise, the credibility of the publication, the presence of citations, the timeliness of the information, and applying critical thinking, students can enhance the quality of their research. Ultimately, mastering these skills will not only improve their academic performance but also prepare them for future endeavors in an increasingly complex world.

在当今这个信息丰富且易于获取的世界中，辨别可信来源与不可靠来源的能力变得愈发重要。这项技能对学生尤为关键，因为他们常常需要进行研究并呈现结果。为了在这个复杂的环境中导航，人们必须学会权威地评估来源，并深入理解什么构成可靠信息。 评估来源的主要方面之一是考虑作者的资历。具有广泛经验或教育背景的作者更有可能提供可信的信息。例如，如果学生正在撰写关于气候变化的论文，他们应该寻找由气候学家或环境科学家撰写的文章，而不是来自普通出版物的观点文章。通过依赖能够权威地谈论其主题的专家，学生可以确保他们的工作基于已建立的知识。 此外，评估信息出现的出版物也至关重要。经过严格审查的同行评审期刊，例如，在出版前经过严格审查，使其成为可靠的信息来源。相比之下，博客或个人网站可能不遵循相同的准确性和可靠性标准。当学生引用在声誉良好的出版物中发表的来源时，他们增强了自己的论点，并权威地呈现了他们的想法。这不仅提升了他们的可信度，还帮助他们更有效地与受众互动。 评估来源的另一个关键因素是引用和参考文献的存在。经过良好研究的文章通常会包括书目或脚注，使读者能够追踪所提供信息的来源。这种透明度对于建立信任和可靠性至关重要。当学生使用引用充分的来源时，他们可以权威地呈现自己的论点，以证据和已建立的研究为支持。 此外，出版日期也是一个重要的考虑因素。在技术和医学等领域，信息可能迅速过时。因此，学生应该优先考虑最近的研究和数据，以确保他们的作品反映最新的发展。通过这样做，他们可以权威地论证自己的观点，表明他们的结论是基于对主题的最新理解。 最后，学生应培养批判性思维技能，以分析他们遇到的信息。这涉及质疑写作背后的动机，考虑潜在的偏见，并认识到事实与观点之间的区别。通过以批判的眼光看待研究，学生可以筛选噪音，识别提供真实洞察的来源。最终，他们的工作将更具分量，并权威地呈现，反映出对主题的深刻参与。 总之，在信息过载的时代，权威地评估来源的能力是学生必备的重要技能。通过考虑作者的专业知识、出版物的可信度、引用的存在、信息的时效性，以及应用批判性思维，学生可以提升研究的质量。最终，掌握这些技能不仅会改善他们的学术表现，还将为他们在日益复杂的世界中的未来努力做好准备。