authorship

简明释义

英[ˈɔːθəʃɪp]美[ˈɔːθərʃɪp]

n. （书等的）原创作者，来源；作者的身份；著述业

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The key principle behind Knol is authorship.

GoogleKnol的核心理念是突出作者。

2.Primary authorship should be represented as a field in the relationship between Author and Book.

第一作者的身份应该表示为Author与 Book之间的关系中的一个字段。

3.Is managerial authorship central to the proper management of a project, as the management By Planning philosophy implies?

如同“以计划管理”哲学暗示的，管理的身份是恰当项目管理的核心么？

4.They all accredited him with the authorship of this book.

他们都认为他是这本书的作者。

5.The film is a real piece of authorship, chilling yet entirely believable.

这部影片是一部真正的“作者影片”，风格冷冽却完全真实可信。

6.The true authorship of "Mary's Little Lamb" is disputed.

“玛丽有一只小羊羔”的真正作者仍然存在争议。

7.The authorship of the novel has been debated for years.

这部小说的作者身份多年来一直备受争议。

8.She received recognition for her authorship of several influential papers.

她因其几篇有影响力论文的作者身份而获得认可。

9.The authorship of the historical document is attributed to an anonymous writer.

这份历史文件的作者身份被归于一位匿名作家。

10.In academia, authorship carries significant weight in career advancement.

在学术界，作者身份在职业发展中具有重要意义。

11.They questioned the authorship of the controversial article.

他们质疑这篇有争议文章的作者身份。

作文

The concept of authorship has evolved significantly over the years, particularly in the age of digital media and the internet. Traditionally, authorship referred to the individual or group responsible for creating a work, such as a book, article, or piece of art. In this context, authorship not only signifies the creator's identity but also their intellectual property rights and the moral implications associated with their work. However, the rise of collaborative projects and open-source platforms has challenged the conventional understanding of authorship. Today, many works are produced through collective efforts, blurring the lines of individual contribution. This shift raises important questions about how we define authorship in a collaborative environment. Moreover, the digital landscape has introduced new forms of authorship, particularly with the advent of social media. Platforms like Twitter, Instagram, and TikTok allow users to create and share content rapidly, often without the formalities associated with traditional authorship. In this context, the notion of authorship becomes more fluid, as anyone can be a creator, and the audience can become part of the creative process by remixing and sharing content. This democratization of authorship empowers individuals but also leads to challenges regarding ownership and attribution. Who truly owns a viral meme, for example? The original creator or the countless users who have reshared and altered it? In academic circles, authorship carries significant weight. It is not just a matter of credit; authorship can influence career advancement, funding opportunities, and professional reputation. In this realm, ethical considerations surrounding authorship are paramount. Issues such as ghostwriting, plagiarism, and the appropriate order of authorship on research papers are hotly debated topics. Institutions and journals have established guidelines to ensure that authorship reflects genuine contributions, thereby maintaining the integrity of scholarly work. Furthermore, the legal implications of authorship cannot be overlooked. Copyright laws protect the rights of creators, ensuring that they receive recognition and compensation for their work. However, as technology continues to evolve, so too do the challenges related to authorship. For instance, artificial intelligence (AI) has begun to play a role in content creation, raising questions about whether AI can be considered an author. If an AI generates a piece of music or a painting, who holds the authorship? The programmer, the user, or the AI itself? These questions highlight the complexities of defining authorship in a rapidly changing world. In conclusion, authorship is a multifaceted concept that encompasses individual rights, ethical considerations, and legal frameworks. As we navigate the complexities of modern media and technology, our understanding of authorship will continue to evolve. It is essential for creators, academics, and consumers alike to engage in discussions about what it means to be an author today. By doing so, we can better appreciate the value of creativity and the importance of recognizing those who contribute to our cultural landscape. Ultimately, the future of authorship will depend on our ability to adapt to new realities while upholding the principles of integrity, respect, and recognition in the creative process.

“authorship”的概念随着时间的推移而发生了显著变化，尤其是在数字媒体和互联网时代。传统上，“authorship”指的是对创作作品（如书籍、文章或艺术作品）负责的个人或团体。在这个背景下，“authorship”不仅意味着创作者的身份，还包括他们的知识产权和与其作品相关的道德影响。然而，协作项目和开源平台的兴起挑战了对“authorship”的传统理解。如今，许多作品是通过集体努力产生的，模糊了个人贡献的界限。这一转变引发了关于如何在协作环境中定义“authorship”的重要问题。 此外，数字环境引入了新的“authorship”形式，特别是社交媒体的出现。像Twitter、Instagram和TikTok这样的平台使用户能够快速创建和分享内容，通常没有与传统“authorship”相关的正式程序。在这种情况下，“authorship”的概念变得更加灵活，因为任何人都可以成为创作者，而观众也可以通过重新混合和分享内容参与创作过程。这种“authorship”的民主化赋予了个人权力，但也导致了关于所有权和归属的挑战。例如，谁真正拥有一个病毒式传播的表情包？原始创作者还是无数重新分享和改变它的用户？ 在学术界，“authorship”具有重要意义。这不仅仅是一个信用问题；“authorship”可以影响职业晋升、资金机会和专业声誉。在这个领域，围绕“authorship”的伦理考量至关重要。诸如代写、剽窃以及研究论文中的适当作者顺序等问题都是热议的话题。机构和期刊已制定指南，以确保“authorship”反映真实的贡献，从而维护学术工作的完整性。 此外，“authorship”的法律影响也不容忽视。版权法保护创作者的权利，确保他们获得对其作品的认可和报酬。然而，随着技术的不断发展，与“authorship”相关的挑战也在增加。例如，人工智能（AI）开始在内容创作中发挥作用，引发了关于AI是否可以被视为作者的问题。如果AI生成了一段音乐或一幅画，谁拥有“authorship”？程序员、用户还是AI本身？这些问题突显了在快速变化的世界中定义“authorship”的复杂性。 总之，“authorship”是一个多方面的概念，涵盖了个人权利、伦理考量和法律框架。随着我们应对现代媒体和技术的复杂性，我们对“authorship”的理解将继续演变。创作者、学者和消费者都必须参与关于今天成为作者意味着什么的讨论。通过这样做，我们可以更好地欣赏创造力的价值，以及认可那些为我们的文化景观做出贡献的人的重要性。最终，“authorship”的未来将取决于我们适应新现实的能力，同时在创作过程中坚持诚信、尊重和认可的原则。