autocracy

简明释义

英[ɔːˈtɒkrəsi]美[ɔːˈtɑːkrəsi]

n. 独裁政治；专制政治；独裁政府；独裁统治的国家

复 数 a u t o c r a c i e s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Through talking about the process of justice and judgement structure in local government, I try to find out the reasons for reaction of local justice under the feudal autocracy in Qing dynasty.

本文即是从清朝州县审判程序和审判组织结构入手，试图了解清朝州县审判机制失调的历史原因及其所带来的深远影响。

2.Through talking about the process of justice and judgement structure in local government, I try to find out the reasons for reaction of local justice under the feudal autocracy in Qing dynasty.

本文即是从清朝州县审判程序和审判组织结构入手，试图了解清朝州县审判机制失调的历史原因及其所带来的深远影响。

3.In spite it was a very rational theory among the monarch theories of various schools then, yet in the long run it still lapsed into the mire of the absolute autocracy.

尽管它是同时期诸家君主论中最具有理性色彩的理论，但最终依旧滑入绝对专制主义的泥潭。

4.In the 17th century, historians had their self-consciousness. They critiqued the feudal autocracy and the orthodox thoughts. Orthodoxy had been shaken.

明末清初的史学思想在史学观念上自主意识增强，产生了针对君主专制的历史批判思潮，理学化史学中的正统论思想遭到动摇；

5.So reaction of local justice under the feudal autocracy in Qing dynasty is a problem can't be overcomed in feudal society.

这其实是封建社会不得不面对的问题，也是这一制度所无法克服的难题。

6.The tandem was an unprecedented break with this historical tradition of conservative autocracy.

“串联”是对这种保守的专治传统的前所未有的突破。

7.Is there really a world of difference between autocracy and democracy?

这两个世界是如此的不同，又是那样的相似。

8.She ceded all power to her son-in-law who now runs the country as an autocracy.

她把权力全部交给自己的女婿，他现在对国家实行独裁统治。

9.The country has been under an autocracy 独裁统治 for several decades, limiting the citizens' freedoms.

这个国家在经历了数十年的autocracy 独裁统治后，限制了公民的自由。

10.In an autocracy 独裁统治, the leader often makes decisions without consulting anyone else.

在autocracy 独裁统治中，领导者通常在没有征求其他人意见的情况下做出决定。

11.Many citizens protested against the autocracy 独裁统治 that suppressed their rights.

许多公民抗议这种压制他们权利的autocracy 独裁统治。

12.The transition from autocracy 独裁统治 to democracy can be a challenging process.

从autocracy 独裁统治转向民主可能是一个具有挑战性的过程。

13.Critics argue that the government's policies reflect an autocracy 独裁统治 rather than a democratic approach.

批评者认为，政府的政策反映出一种autocracy 独裁统治而非民主的方法。

作文

In the realm of political systems, one term that often arises is autocracy. An autocracy is a form of government in which a single person or entity holds absolute power and authority over the state. This system contrasts sharply with democracies, where power is distributed among various branches of government and the populace has a say in decision-making. The implications of living under an autocracy can be profound, impacting everything from individual freedoms to economic development. Historically, many nations have experienced periods of autocracy. For instance, during the reign of Joseph Stalin in the Soviet Union, the government exemplified the characteristics of an autocracy. Stalin wielded immense power, often using oppressive measures to silence dissent and maintain control. The consequences were dire, as millions suffered from famine, purges, and a general lack of personal freedoms. Such examples illustrate how an autocracy can lead to a climate of fear and repression. In contrast, democratic societies generally promote the idea of shared governance, where citizens participate in elections and have a voice in their government. This participation is crucial for fostering accountability and transparency. However, even in democracies, there can be tendencies toward autocracy, particularly when leaders become overly powerful or when checks and balances are weakened. For example, certain leaders may attempt to consolidate power by undermining judicial independence or restricting press freedoms, leading to a gradual erosion of democratic norms and the emergence of an autocracy. The rise of autocracy in modern times raises important questions about governance and human rights. In recent years, several countries have seen a shift toward autocracy, as leaders exploit crises—such as economic downturns or public health emergencies—to justify the expansion of their powers. This trend is concerning, as it often comes at the expense of civil liberties and democratic institutions. Citizens in these nations may find themselves increasingly marginalized, with little recourse to challenge the authority of their leaders. Despite the challenges posed by autocracy, there are also examples of resistance and resilience. In many cases, citizens have mobilized to demand greater accountability and transparency from their governments. Social movements and protests can play a critical role in challenging autocracy and advocating for democratic reforms. The Arab Spring, for instance, highlighted the desire for change in several Middle Eastern countries, as people rose up against oppressive regimes. Ultimately, understanding autocracy is essential for recognizing the importance of democratic values and the need to protect them. A healthy democracy relies on active citizen engagement, the rule of law, and respect for human rights. As history has shown, the fight against autocracy is ongoing, and it requires vigilance and commitment from individuals and communities alike. By staying informed and involved, citizens can help safeguard their democratic institutions and ensure that power remains in the hands of the people rather than a select few. In conclusion, autocracy represents a significant threat to freedom and democracy. Its prevalence in various parts of the world serves as a reminder of the importance of promoting democratic governance and protecting individual rights. As we reflect on the lessons of the past, we must remain steadfast in our commitment to resist autocracy and foster a more just and equitable society for all.

在政治体制的领域中，一个经常出现的术语是专制。专制是一种政府形式，其中一个人或实体对国家拥有绝对的权力和权威。这种制度与民主制度形成鲜明对比，后者将权力分散在各个政府部门之间，公众在决策中有发言权。在专制统治下生活的影响可能是深远的，影响从个人自由到经济发展等方方面面。 历史上，许多国家经历过专制的时期。例如，在苏联，约瑟夫·斯大林的统治期间，政府体现了专制的特征。斯大林拥有巨大的权力，常常使用压迫手段来压制异议并维持控制。后果是可怕的，数百万人遭受饥荒、清洗和普遍缺乏个人自由。这些例子说明了专制如何导致恐惧和压迫的气候。 相比之下，民主社会通常提倡共享治理的理念，公民参与选举并在政府中发声。这种参与对促进问责制和透明度至关重要。然而，即使在民主制度中，也可能存在向专制倾斜的趋势，特别是当领导者变得过于强大或制衡机制被削弱时。例如，某些领导者可能试图通过破坏司法独立或限制新闻自由来巩固权力，导致民主规范逐渐侵蚀，最终形成专制。 现代专制的兴起提出了关于治理和人权的重要问题。近年来，一些国家出现了向专制转变的趋势，领导者利用危机（如经济衰退或公共卫生紧急情况）来为扩大权力辩护。这一趋势令人担忧，因为这往往以公民自由和民主机构为代价。在这些国家，公民可能发现自己越来越边缘化，几乎没有办法挑战领导者的权威。 尽管专制带来了挑战，但也有抵抗和韧性的例子。在许多情况下，公民已经动员起来，要求政府更大程度的问责和透明。社会运动和抗议活动在挑战专制和倡导民主改革方面可以发挥关键作用。例如，阿拉伯之春突显了中东多个国家对变革的渴望，人们纷纷反抗压迫政权。 最终，理解专制对于认识民主价值的重要性及其保护需求至关重要。健康的民主依赖于公民的积极参与、法治和对人权的尊重。历史表明，反对专制的斗争仍在继续，这需要个人和社区的警惕和承诺。通过保持知情和参与，公民可以帮助保护他们的民主制度，确保权力掌握在人民手中，而不是少数人手中。 总之，专制代表了对自由和民主的重大威胁。它在世界各地的普遍存在提醒我们必须促进民主治理并保护个人权利。当我们反思过去的教训时，我们必须坚定不移地致力于抵制专制，为所有人营造一个更加公正和平等的社会。