autocratic

简明释义

英[ˌɔːtəˈkrætɪk]美[ˌɔːtəˈkrætɪk]

adj. 独裁的，专制的；专横的，独断专行的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.But the generals have often acted only when prompted by shouting from the street, and then grudgingly, leaving the impression that their instincts remain stubbornly autocratic.

但上校们的作为往往要街道上人们的大力呼喊之下才下得了决心，看上去勉勉强强，给人们不好的印象，仿佛他们骨子里还是希望走专权主义的老路似的。

2.It is widely believed that the Peugeot family tired of Mr Streiff's autocratic ways and penchant for confrontation.

因此普遍认为斯特·雷夫之所以下课是因为标致家族已经受够了他的独断和强硬作风。

3.He is never autocratic, never bullying.

他从不专横，从不带有威胁性。

4.It is widely believed that the Peugeot family tired of Mr. Streiff's autocratic ways and penchant for confrontation.

人们普遍认为，标致家族厌倦了斯特雷夫先生专横的处事方式以及对抗倾向。

5.By all accounts, Mr. Jobs's perfectionism, autocratic managerial style and disregard for conventional wisdom are at the heart of Apple's remarkable streak of success.

在大家看来，乔博斯的完美主义，独断的管理方式，以及不按常理出牌，一起构成了苹果这一阶段成功的核心理由。

6.The people have grown intolerant in recent weeks of the king's autocratic ways.

最近几周，民众越来越难以忍受国王的专制行径。

7.Movie directors are known for being vain, autocratic and egomaniacal, but the curious nature of their art from also makes them invisible.

电影导演以自大、专横而著称，但是他们对于艺术的求知的本能却是不易被发现的。

8.The leader's autocratic 专制的 style left little room for team input.

领导者的autocratic 专制的风格几乎没有给团队提供发言的空间。

9.In an autocratic 专制的 regime, decisions are made by a single ruler without consultation.

在一个autocratic 专制的政权中，决策由单一统治者做出，无需咨询他人。

10.Her autocratic 专制的 management style often led to high employee turnover.

她的autocratic 专制的管理风格常常导致员工流失率高。

11.The company's autocratic 专制的 approach stifled creativity and innovation.

公司的autocratic 专制的方法抑制了创造力和创新。

12.Critics argue that the president's autocratic 专制的 tendencies undermine democracy.

批评者认为总统的autocratic 专制的倾向削弱了民主。

作文

In today's world, the concept of governance is often discussed in various contexts, ranging from democratic societies to more controlled regimes. One term that frequently arises in discussions about leadership styles is autocratic, which refers to a system of government or leadership where one person holds absolute power and makes decisions unilaterally. This style of leadership can be contrasted with more democratic approaches, where decision-making is shared among a group of individuals. Understanding the implications of autocratic leadership is crucial, especially when analyzing historical and contemporary political systems. The autocratic leadership style has been prevalent throughout history, with many notable figures exemplifying this approach. For instance, leaders like Joseph Stalin and Adolf Hitler are often cited as archetypes of autocratic rulers who exercised extreme control over their nations. These leaders made decisions without seeking input from others, often leading to significant consequences for their countries and the world. The lack of checks and balances in an autocratic regime can result in abuses of power, human rights violations, and suppression of dissent. Moreover, the impact of autocratic leadership extends beyond politics into various organizations and businesses. In the corporate world, some CEOs adopt an autocratic style, believing it allows for swift decision-making and clear direction. While this can lead to quick results, it may also stifle creativity and lower employee morale, as team members might feel undervalued and excluded from the decision-making process. On the other hand, proponents of autocratic leadership argue that it can be effective in times of crisis or when decisive action is necessary. For example, during emergencies, having a single leader making quick decisions can be beneficial. However, this effectiveness often comes at the cost of long-term sustainability and employee engagement. In contrast, democratic leadership encourages participation and collaboration, allowing team members to contribute their ideas and perspectives. This inclusivity can lead to more innovative solutions and a stronger sense of ownership among employees. Ultimately, the choice between autocratic and democratic leadership should depend on the specific context and goals of the organization or nation. As we navigate the complexities of leadership styles, it is essential to recognize the implications of autocratic governance. While it may offer short-term efficiency, the potential for long-term negative consequences cannot be ignored. History has shown us that unchecked power can lead to tyranny and suffering. Therefore, fostering a culture of collaboration and inclusivity may prove more beneficial in the long run. In conclusion, the term autocratic encapsulates a leadership style that prioritizes unilateral decision-making and absolute control. While it may have its advantages in certain situations, the risks associated with such a concentrated form of power are significant. As we reflect on the importance of leadership in both political and organizational contexts, it becomes clear that promoting democratic values and encouraging participation may lead to healthier and more sustainable outcomes for all stakeholders involved.

在当今世界，治理的概念常常在各种背景下被讨论，从民主社会到更受控制的政权。一个经常出现在关于领导风格讨论中的术语是autocratic，它指的是一种政府或领导体制，其中一个人拥有绝对权力并单方面做出决定。这种领导风格可以与更民主的方法形成对比，后者中决策是在一群人之间共享的。理解autocratic领导的影响至关重要，特别是在分析历史和当代政治体系时。 autocratic领导风格在历史上一直很普遍，许多著名人物体现了这种方法。例如，约瑟夫·斯大林和阿道夫·希特勒等领导者常常被视为autocratic统治者的典型，他们对国家施加了极端控制。这些领导者在没有寻求他人意见的情况下做出决定，往往导致国家和世界的重要后果。在autocratic政权中缺乏制衡可能导致权力滥用、人权侵犯和压制异议。 此外，autocratic领导的影响不仅限于政治，还扩展到各种组织和企业。在企业界，一些首席执行官采用autocratic风格，认为这允许快速决策和明确方向。虽然这可能导致快速结果，但也可能抑制创造力并降低员工士气，因为团队成员可能会感到不被重视和排除在决策过程之外。 另一方面，autocratic领导的支持者辩称，在危机时期或需要果断行动时，它可能是有效的。例如，在紧急情况下，由一个领导者迅速做出决定可能是有益的。然而，这种有效性往往以牺牲长期可持续性和员工参与感为代价。 相比之下，民主领导鼓励参与和合作，允许团队成员贡献他们的想法和观点。这种包容性可以导致更具创新性的解决方案和更强的员工归属感。最终，在选择autocratic和民主领导之间应该根据组织或国家的具体背景和目标来决定。 随着我们驾驭领导风格的复杂性，认识到autocratic治理的影响至关重要。虽然它可能在短期内提供效率，但不可忽视的长期负面后果的潜力是显著的。历史告诉我们，未经制衡的权力可能导致暴政和苦难。因此，培养一种合作和包容的文化在长期内可能会更有利。 总之，autocratic这个词概括了一种优先考虑单边决策和绝对控制的领导风格。虽然在某些情况下，它可能具有优势，但与这种集中形式的权力相关的风险是显著的。当我们反思领导在政治和组织背景中的重要性时，很明显，促进民主价值观和鼓励参与可能会导致所有利益相关者更健康和更可持续的结果。