axed

简明释义

英[ækst]美[ækst]

削减

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.A large number of products were axed in the process, including the Newton.

包括Newton在内的很多产品在此过程中被砍掉了。

2.No fries with that: fast food axed at Afghan bases.

美军阿富汗基地取消薯条等快餐食品。

3.Skittish employers, which have slashed 1.2 million jobs this year alone, probably axed another 320,000 last month, economists forecast.

经济学家预测，忧心忡忡的雇主单是今年就裁掉了120万个岗位，上个月可能又裁掉了32万个。

4.Actors and pop stars have found themselves unwelcome in China, with promotional events axed and television appearances cancelled.

演员和流行歌手发现自己在中国不受欢迎，宣传活动被叫停，电视出镜安排被取消。

5.I co axed a kiss from the little girl.

我哄那小女孩亲了我一下。

6.The company is losing money so a quarter of our staff has to be axed.

公司亏损，因此四分之一的雇员将被解雇。

7.That's the kind of stuff that will be axed.

按摩这类不必要的开支一定要被砍掉willbe axed。

8.The company has decided to close the branch, and many jobs were axed.

公司决定关闭这个分支，许多工作被砍掉。

9.Due to budget cuts, several projects were axed from the schedule.

由于预算削减，几个项目被砍掉了。

10.The director announced that the film was axed after the initial screenings.

导演宣布这部电影在初次放映后被砍掉了。

11.Her proposal for a new marketing strategy was axed by the board.

她的新营销策略提案被董事会砍掉了。

12.The show was axed due to low ratings.

由于收视率低，这个节目被砍掉了。

作文

In recent years, many companies have faced tough decisions regarding their workforce. One of the most drastic measures taken by management is when positions are axed, meaning they are eliminated or cut from the organization. This decision often comes as a shock to employees, especially those who have dedicated years of service to the company. The term axed can evoke feelings of uncertainty and fear among staff members, as it signifies not only job loss but also a shift in the company's direction. For example, a well-known tech firm recently announced that it would be axing several departments due to declining profits. Employees were left wondering how this would affect their roles and the future of the company. The news of jobs being axed spread quickly, leading to anxiety and speculation about which positions would be next on the chopping block. The impact of axing jobs goes beyond just the individuals affected; it can also ripple through the entire organization. Morale can plummet as remaining employees grapple with increased workloads and the fear of further layoffs. Moreover, the public perception of the company may suffer, as customers and clients may question the stability of a business that is axing jobs. While companies often justify these cuts as necessary for financial health, the human cost cannot be overlooked. Those whose jobs are axed must face the reality of unemployment, which can lead to financial strain and emotional distress. Many may struggle to find new employment in a competitive job market, leading to a prolonged period of uncertainty. In response to the challenges posed by job axing, some organizations have implemented support systems for affected employees. These may include severance packages, outplacement services, and mental health resources to help individuals transition to new opportunities. However, the effectiveness of these measures can vary greatly depending on the company’s commitment to supporting its former employees. Additionally, the conversation around job axing has sparked discussions about corporate responsibility and the ethical implications of such decisions. Many believe that companies should prioritize employee welfare and seek alternative solutions before resorting to layoffs. This could involve exploring options like voluntary retirement programs, reduced hours, or even temporary furloughs. In conclusion, the term axed carries significant weight in the corporate world, representing not just the loss of jobs but also the broader implications for employee morale and company culture. As businesses navigate the complexities of the modern economy, it is crucial for them to consider the human side of their decisions and strive for solutions that minimize the need for axing jobs. By doing so, they can foster a more resilient workforce and maintain a positive reputation in their industry.

近年来，许多公司面临着关于员工队伍的艰难决策。管理层采取的最激烈措施之一就是当职位被裁掉，意味着它们从组织中被消除或削减。这一决定常常令员工感到震惊，尤其是那些在公司服务多年的人。术语裁掉可以引发员工的不确定感和恐惧，因为这不仅意味着失业，还标志着公司方向的变化。 例如，一家知名科技公司最近宣布，由于利润下降，它将裁掉几个部门。员工们开始思考这将如何影响他们的角色以及公司的未来。关于职位被裁掉的消息迅速传播，导致焦虑和对哪些职位会成为下一个被裁对象的猜测。 裁掉工作的影响不仅限于受影响的个人；它还可能在整个组织中产生涟漪效应。由于剩余员工不得不应对增加的工作负担和进一步裁员的恐惧，士气可能会骤降。此外，公众对公司的看法可能会受到损害，因为客户和客户可能会质疑一家正在裁掉工作的企业的稳定性。 尽管公司通常将这些裁员作为财务健康的必要措施，但人力成本不能被忽视。那些工作被裁掉的人必须面对失业的现实，这可能导致经济压力和情感困扰。许多人可能会在竞争激烈的就业市场中努力寻找新工作，导致长期的不确定性。 为应对裁掉工作的挑战，一些组织已为受影响的员工实施了支持系统。这些可能包括遣散费、安置服务和心理健康资源，以帮助个人过渡到新的机会。然而，这些措施的有效性可能因公司对支持前员工的承诺而大相径庭。 此外，关于裁掉工作的讨论引发了关于企业责任和此类决策的伦理含义的讨论。许多人认为，公司应该优先考虑员工福利，并在诉诸裁员之前寻求替代解决方案。这可能涉及探索自愿退休计划、减少工作时间甚至临时休假等选项。 总之，术语裁掉在企业界具有重要意义，不仅代表失业的损失，还代表员工士气和公司文化的更广泛影响。随着企业在现代经济中应对复杂性，考虑决策的人性化方面并努力寻求减少裁掉工作的解决方案至关重要。通过这样做，他们可以培养更具韧性的员工队伍，并在行业中保持积极的声誉。