axing

简明释义

英[ˈæksɪŋ]美[ˈæksɪŋ]

v. 削减（经费等）；（突然）解雇，取消；用斧砍（axe 的现在分词）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Tell her I was axing at her.

告诉她，我打听她来着。

2.One fear is that as Banks scale back their balance-sheets, firms that rely on bank loans will have to act in step, axing their spending to reduce debts.

有人担心，随着银行相应缩减资产平衡负债表，靠银行贷款的各企业不得不采取相应的措施，减少消费，继而减少负债。

3.The villagers were busy axing firewood for the coming winter.

村民们正在砍柴，以备冬天使用。

4.Cuts announced by David Cameron in the Defence Review this month will lead to the axing of Harrier jump jets and the decommissioning of the Ark Royal carrier.

卡梅伦首相在本月《防务评论》中提出的开支削减将意味着弃用“鹞式”垂直起降喷气式战斗机，并让“皇家方舟”号航母退役。

5."Captain Smollett, Sir, axing to speak with you," said he.

“阁下，斯莫列特船长要求同您谈话。”他说道。

6.Landlord: Axing? Aren't you in prison? Do you escape?

房东：阿星？你不是被关吗？你逃出来喔？

7.Aston Martin is axing 600 jobs at Gaydon in Warwickshire while GKN, the car and aircraft parts company, is shedding more than 500 jobs and Honda has shut its Swindon plant for four months.

阿斯顿·马丁在英国华威郡Gaydon生产工厂将裁员600人，而汽车和飞机零部件生产商GKN集团正在削减500个工作岗位，本田汽车已经关闭其在英国斯文顿工厂4个月。

8.Aston Martin is axing 600 jobs at Gaydon in Warwickshire while GKN, the car and aircraft parts company, is shedding more than 500 jobs and Honda has shut its Swindon plant for four months.

阿斯顿·马丁在英国华威郡Gaydon生产工厂将裁员600人，而汽车和飞机零部件生产商GKN集团正在削减500个工作岗位，本田汽车已经关闭其在英国斯文顿工厂4个月。

9.The company is considering axing several projects that are not profitable.

公司正在考虑削减几个不盈利的项目。

10.After reviewing the budget, the manager decided to axe unnecessary expenses.

在审核预算后，经理决定削减不必要的开支。

11.The new policy will result in axing some of the current benefits for employees.

新政策将导致削减一些员工当前的福利。

12.Due to low ratings, the television network is axing the show after just one season.

由于收视率低，电视网络在仅播出一个季度后就取消了该节目。

13.The city council voted to axe the proposed tax increase.

市议会投票决定取消提议的增税。

作文

In recent years, many companies have faced the difficult decision of restructuring their workforce to improve efficiency and reduce costs. One of the most controversial actions taken during this process is often referred to as axing, which means to cut or eliminate jobs. This term has become increasingly common in discussions about corporate downsizing and layoffs. The impact of axing employees can be profound, affecting not only those who lose their jobs but also the remaining staff and the overall company culture. When a company announces axing positions, it usually sparks a wave of anxiety and uncertainty among employees. Fear of losing their jobs can lead to decreased morale, lower productivity, and even health issues among staff members. Employees may start to question their job security, which can create a toxic work environment. Furthermore, the emotional toll on those who are laid off can be significant, as they often face financial difficulties and the stress of finding new employment in a competitive job market. From a business perspective, axing can be seen as a necessary evil. Companies may need to streamline operations to remain competitive, especially in industries facing rapid changes or economic downturns. However, the way in which axing is handled can make a huge difference in how it is perceived by both the public and the remaining employees. Transparent communication and support for affected workers can help mitigate some of the negative effects associated with axing. For instance, providing severance packages, career counseling, and job placement services can demonstrate that the company values its employees, even when making tough decisions. Moreover, the long-term consequences of axing should not be underestimated. While it may provide short-term financial relief, it can also lead to a loss of institutional knowledge and expertise within the organization. Experienced employees who are let go take with them valuable skills and insights that can be difficult to replace. In addition, the company may struggle to attract top talent in the future if it gains a reputation for being unstable or unsupportive. In conclusion, while axing jobs may sometimes be necessary for a company's survival, it is crucial to approach the process with care and consideration. The way in which layoffs are conducted can have lasting effects on employee morale, company culture, and the organization's reputation. As businesses navigate these challenging waters, they must strive to balance financial needs with compassion for their workforce. Ultimately, the goal should be to foster a healthy work environment that supports both the company's success and the well-being of its employees.

近年来，许多公司面临着重组员工队伍以提高效率和降低成本的艰难决定。在这个过程中，通常会采取的一个颇具争议的行动被称为裁员，这意味着削减或消除工作岗位。这个术语在关于企业裁员和裁员的讨论中变得越来越普遍。裁员对员工的影响可能是深远的，不仅影响到失去工作的员工，还影响到剩下的员工和整体公司文化。 当一家公司宣布裁员职位时，通常会引发员工中的一波焦虑和不确定感。失去工作的恐惧可能导致士气下降、生产力降低，甚至员工的健康问题。员工可能开始质疑自己的工作安全，这可能会创造出一种有毒的工作环境。此外，被裁员的人的情感负担可能非常重大，因为他们通常面临财务困难和在竞争激烈的就业市场中寻找新工作的压力。 从商业角度来看，裁员可以被视为一种必要的恶。公司可能需要精简运营以保持竞争力，尤其是在面临快速变化或经济低迷的行业。然而，裁员的处理方式可能会对公众和剩余员工的看法产生巨大差异。透明的沟通和对受影响工人的支持可以帮助减少与裁员相关的一些负面影响。例如，提供遣散费、职业咨询和就业安置服务可以表明公司重视其员工，即使在做出艰难决定时。 此外，裁员的长期后果也不容小觑。虽然它可能提供短期的财务缓解，但也可能导致组织内知识和专业技能的损失。被裁掉的经验丰富的员工带走了宝贵的技能和见解，而这些是很难替代的。此外，如果公司因不稳定或不支持而获得声誉，它未来可能会在吸引顶尖人才方面面临困境。 总之，虽然在某些情况下，裁员工作可能对公司的生存是必要的，但在处理这一过程时必须谨慎和周到。裁员的方式会对员工士气、公司文化和组织声誉产生持久影响。当企业在这些挑战中航行时，必须努力平衡财务需求与对员工的关怀。最终，目标应该是营造一个健康的工作环境，支持公司的成功和员工的福祉。