bureaucracies

简明释义

英[ˌbjʊəˈrɒkrəsiz]美[ˌbjʊˈrɑkrəsiːz]

n. 繁文褥节；官僚政治（bureaucracy 的复数）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.This means that fans in South Asia, Australia and New Zealand were left to obtain visas from what is reputedly not one of the speediest bureaucracies in the world.

这意味着，南亚、澳大利亚和新西兰的球迷，将需要向加勒比海的这九个国家申请特别签证，而据说，这些国家的相关机构并不是全球最高效的官僚系统之一。

2.The organizations behind the initial intervention were international bureaucracies with an incomplete understanding of the local population, particularly of rural women.

组织在事件发生的伊始，国际组织对当地人口状况，尤其是农村妇女了解的不够彻底。

3.These reports give the impression that Egypt is a place where people are trying to lead normal, middle-class lives, but they are frustrated at every turn by overstaffed and lethargic bureaucracies.

这些报告中说，埃及人民想要过上正常、中产的生活，但臃肿和迟钝的官僚机构却让人们灰心丧气。

4.Children from higher-income families are likely to have the skills to navigate bureaucracies and succeed in schools and workplaces, Ms. Lareau said.

拉罗女士说，来自高收入家庭的孩子可以更自如地应对官场上的事宜，并在学校和职场上取得成功。

5.State bureaucracies can tend to stifle enterprise and initiative.

国家官僚体制会压抑人的进取心和积极性。

6.These reports give the impression that Egypt is a place where people are trying to lead normal, middle-class lives, but they are frustrated at every turn by overstaffed and lethargic bureaucracies.

这些报告中说，埃及人民想要过上正常、中产的生活，但臃肿和迟钝的官僚机构却让人们灰心丧气。

7.In the United States we have many private universities, and I think they are large bureaucracies also.

在美国，我们有很多私立大学，而且我认为它们也是庞大的官僚机构。

8.Neptune rules over mental health, attitudes, intuition, secrets, spiritual mysteries, paranormal activities, charities, bureaucracies, and other hidden forces that work behind the scenes.

海王星的规则对精神健康，态度，直觉，秘密，精神奥秘，超自然的活动，慈善机构，官僚机构和其他隐藏的势力在幕后。

9.Bureaucracies, red tape, stupid policies, and such can cause all kinds of challenges and it is very difficult to create smart simple solutions to these problems.

官僚机构的繁文缛节，愚蠢的政策，这种可能导致各种挑战，这是非常难以形成这些问题的智能简单的解决方案。

10.Many people find that dealing with bureaucracies 官僚机构 can be frustrating and time-consuming.

许多人发现，处理官僚机构 官僚机构可能令人沮丧且耗时。

11.The new policy aims to reduce the red tape associated with bureaucracies 官僚机构 in government.

新政策旨在减少与政府中的官僚机构 官僚机构相关的繁文缛节。

12.In many countries, bureaucracies 官僚机构 are seen as obstacles to economic growth.

在许多国家，官僚机构 官僚机构被视为经济增长的障碍。

13.The efficiency of bureaucracies 官僚机构 can greatly affect public service delivery.

官僚机构 官僚机构的效率可以极大地影响公共服务的提供。

14.Reforming bureaucracies 官僚机构 is often a key focus for political leaders.

改革官僚机构 官僚机构通常是政治领导人的关键关注点。

作文

In today's world, the term bureaucracies (官僚机构) often evokes a sense of frustration and inefficiency. Many people associate bureaucracies (官僚机构) with long lines, endless forms, and a lack of personal attention. However, it is essential to understand that bureaucracies (官僚机构) play a crucial role in the functioning of modern societies. They are designed to manage large organizations and ensure that processes are carried out systematically and fairly. The concept of bureaucracies (官僚机构) dates back to ancient civilizations, where leaders needed to delegate tasks to manage their growing empires. Over time, these systems evolved into what we recognize today as formal bureaucracies (官僚机构). In essence, a bureaucracy (官僚机构) consists of a structured hierarchy, defined rules, and specialized roles that help organizations operate efficiently. One of the primary advantages of bureaucracies (官僚机构) is their ability to maintain order and consistency. For instance, government agencies rely on bureaucracies (官僚机构) to implement laws and regulations fairly across different regions. This ensures that citizens receive equal treatment, regardless of their background or social status. Additionally, bureaucracies (官僚机构) help organizations manage resources effectively, allowing them to achieve their goals while minimizing waste. Despite these benefits, bureaucracies (官僚机构) are often criticized for being overly rigid and slow to adapt to change. The layers of hierarchy can lead to delays in decision-making, which can be particularly problematic in times of crisis. For example, during natural disasters or public health emergencies, the need for swift action is paramount. However, the very structure that makes bureaucracies (官僚机构) effective can also hinder their responsiveness. Moreover, the complexity of bureaucracies (官僚机构) can result in confusion among both employees and the public. Individuals may find it challenging to navigate the system, leading to frustration and disengagement. This disconnect can erode trust in institutions, as people feel that their needs are not being met. To address these issues, many organizations are exploring ways to streamline their bureaucracies (官僚机构) and make them more accessible. In recent years, there has been a push towards adopting more agile approaches to management. This involves flattening hierarchies and empowering employees to make decisions without excessive oversight. By doing so, organizations can retain the benefits of bureaucracies (官僚机构) while also fostering innovation and adaptability. For instance, some companies have implemented cross-functional teams that allow for faster communication and collaboration, mitigating some of the traditional drawbacks of bureaucracies (官僚机构). In conclusion, while bureaucracies (官僚机构) are often viewed negatively, they serve an essential purpose in maintaining order and efficiency in complex organizations. Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of bureaucracies (官僚机构) is crucial for anyone looking to navigate modern institutions effectively. As society continues to evolve, it will be interesting to see how bureaucracies (官僚机构) adapt to meet the changing needs of the public and the challenges of the future.

在当今世界，术语bureaucracies（官僚机构）常常引发人们的挫败感和低效感。许多人将bureaucracies（官僚机构）与漫长的排队、无尽的表格和缺乏个人关注联系在一起。然而，理解bureaucracies（官僚机构）在现代社会运作中的重要角色至关重要。它们旨在管理大型组织，并确保流程系统地和公平地进行。 bureaucracies（官僚机构）的概念可以追溯到古代文明，当时领导者需要委派任务来管理不断扩大的帝国。随着时间的推移，这些系统演变成我们今天所认识的正式bureaucracies（官僚机构）。从本质上讲，bureaucracy（官僚机构）由一个结构化的层次、明确的规则和专业化的角色组成，帮助组织高效运作。 bureaucracies（官僚机构）的主要优点之一是它们能够维持秩序和一致性。例如，政府机构依靠bureaucracies（官僚机构）在不同地区公正地实施法律和规章。这确保了公民，无论其背景或社会地位如何，都能受到平等对待。此外，bureaucracies（官僚机构）帮助组织有效管理资源，使其能够实现目标，同时最大限度地减少浪费。 尽管有这些好处，bureaucracies（官僚机构）常常因过于僵化和缓慢适应变化而受到批评。层级结构可能导致决策延误，这在危机时期尤其成问题。例如，在自然灾害或公共卫生紧急情况期间，迅速采取行动是至关重要的。然而，正是使bureaucracies（官僚机构）有效的结构也可能阻碍其响应能力。 此外，bureaucracies（官僚机构）的复杂性可能导致员工和公众之间的混淆。个人可能发现很难导航系统，从而导致挫败感和脱离感。这种脱节可能侵蚀对机构的信任，因为人们感觉他们的需求没有得到满足。为了解决这些问题，许多组织正在探索简化其bureaucracies（官僚机构）并使其更易于访问的方法。 近年来，有人推动采用更灵活的管理方法。这涉及到扁平化层级结构，赋予员工在不受过度监督的情况下做出决策的权力。通过这样做，组织可以保留bureaucracies（官僚机构）的好处，同时促进创新和适应性。例如，一些公司已经实施了跨职能团队，允许更快的沟通与合作，从而减轻传统bureaucracies（官僚机构）的一些缺点。 总之，虽然bureaucracies（官僚机构）常常被负面看待，但它们在维护复杂组织的秩序和效率方面发挥着至关重要的作用。理解bureaucracies（官僚机构）的优缺点对于任何希望有效导航现代机构的人来说都是至关重要的。随着社会的不断发展，观察bureaucracies（官僚机构）如何适应以满足公众不断变化的需求和未来挑战将是非常有趣的。