bureaucratise

简明释义

英[bjʊəˈrɒkrətaɪz]美[bjʊˈrɑːkrəˌtaɪz]

v. （使）官僚化（等于 bureaucratize）

第 三 人 称 单 数 b u r e a u c r a t i s e s

现 在 分 词 b u r e a u c r a t i s i n g

过 去 式 b u r e a u c r a t i s e d

过 去 分 词 b u r e a u c r a t i s e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The new management policies tend to bureaucratise 官僚化 the decision-making process, making it slower.

新的管理政策往往使决策过程官僚化，变得更慢。

2.As the organization grew, it began to bureaucratise 官僚化 its operations, leading to frustration among employees.

随着组织的扩大，它开始官僚化其操作，这导致员工感到沮丧。

3.Too many rules can bureaucratise 官僚化 a simple process, causing inefficiencies.

过多的规则可能会官僚化一个简单的过程，导致效率低下。

4.We need to avoid practices that bureaucratise 官僚化 our creative workflows.

我们需要避免那些会官僚化我们创意工作流程的做法。

5.Some critics argue that the new law will bureaucratise 官僚化 the healthcare system further.

一些批评者认为新法律将进一步官僚化医疗系统。

作文

In today’s fast-paced world, the term bureaucratise (官僚化) has become increasingly relevant. It refers to the process by which organizations or systems become overly complex and rule-bound, often leading to inefficiency and a lack of responsiveness. This phenomenon is particularly noticeable in large institutions, such as government agencies and corporations, where layers of management and rigid procedures can stifle creativity and innovation. When an organization begins to bureaucratise (官僚化), it typically starts with good intentions. Leaders implement rules and regulations to ensure consistency and fairness. However, as more policies are added, the original purpose can be lost. Employees may find themselves spending more time navigating through red tape than actually completing their work. This can lead to frustration and a decrease in morale, as individuals feel that their contributions are undervalued. One significant impact of bureaucratise (官僚化) is the hindrance of decision-making processes. In a bureaucratic environment, decisions often require multiple approvals across various levels of hierarchy. This can slow down the response time to emerging challenges and opportunities. For instance, if a company needs to pivot its strategy due to market changes, a bureaucratic structure might delay the necessary adjustments, allowing competitors to gain an advantage. Moreover, bureaucratise (官僚化) can also create a culture of compliance rather than one of innovation. Employees may become so focused on adhering to established procedures that they hesitate to propose new ideas or challenge the status quo. This culture can be detrimental, especially in industries that thrive on innovation and adaptability. Organizations that fail to recognize the negative effects of bureaucratise (官僚化) risk becoming obsolete as they struggle to keep up with the evolving demands of their customers. To combat the effects of bureaucratise (官僚化), many organizations are adopting more agile and flexible structures. By empowering teams and encouraging a culture of collaboration, companies can foster an environment where employees feel valued and motivated to contribute. Additionally, reducing unnecessary layers of management and streamlining processes can help organizations respond more quickly to changes in the market. Another approach to mitigate bureaucratise (官僚化) is to regularly review and revise policies and procedures. By soliciting feedback from employees at all levels, leaders can identify areas where bureaucracy may be hindering performance. Implementing a continuous improvement mindset can help organizations remain dynamic and responsive to both internal and external challenges. In conclusion, while bureaucratise (官僚化) may begin with the intention of creating order and efficiency, it can ultimately lead to stagnation and frustration within an organization. It is essential for leaders to recognize the signs of bureaucracy creeping into their systems and take proactive steps to foster a more agile and innovative culture. By doing so, organizations can not only survive but thrive in an ever-changing landscape.

在当今快节奏的世界中，术语bureaucratise（官僚化）变得越来越相关。它指的是组织或系统变得过于复杂和规则导向的过程，通常导致效率低下和缺乏响应能力。这种现象在大型机构中尤为明显，例如政府机构和公司，在这些地方，管理层和严格的程序可能会扼杀创造力和创新。 当一个组织开始bureaucratise（官僚化）时，通常是出于良好的意图。领导者实施规则和法规以确保一致性和公平性。然而，随着更多政策的增加，最初的目的可能会丧失。员工可能发现自己花费更多的时间在繁琐的程序上，而不是实际完成工作。这可能导致沮丧和士气下降，因为个人感到自己的贡献被低估。 bureaucratise（官僚化）的一个显著影响是决策过程的阻碍。在官僚环境中，决策通常需要多个层级的批准。这可能减缓对新出现的挑战和机会的反应时间。例如，如果一家公司需要根据市场变化来调整其战略，官僚结构可能会延迟必要的调整，使竞争对手获得优势。 此外，bureaucratise（官僚化）还可能创造一种合规文化，而不是创新文化。员工可能过于专注于遵循既定程序，以至于不愿提出新想法或挑战现状。这种文化可能是有害的，特别是在那些依赖创新和适应性的行业中。未能认识到bureaucratise（官僚化）负面影响的组织，可能面临逐渐过时的风险，因为他们难以跟上客户不断变化的需求。 为了应对bureaucratise（官僚化）的影响，许多组织正在采用更加敏捷和灵活的结构。通过赋予团队权力并鼓励协作文化，公司可以培养一种员工感到被重视和积极贡献的环境。此外，减少不必要的管理层次和简化流程可以帮助组织更快地对市场变化做出反应。 减轻bureaucratise（官僚化）影响的另一种方法是定期审查和修订政策和程序。通过征求各级员工的反馈，领导者可以识别出官僚主义可能妨碍绩效的领域。实施持续改进的思维方式可以帮助组织保持动态，并对内部和外部挑战做出响应。 总之，虽然bureaucratise（官僚化）可能始于创造秩序和效率的意图，但最终可能导致组织内的停滞和沮丧。领导者必须认识到官僚主义渗入系统的迹象，并采取主动措施以促进更敏捷和创新的文化。通过这样做，组织不仅可以生存，还可以在不断变化的环境中蓬勃发展。