bureaucratism

简明释义

英[ˌbjʊəroʊˈkrætɪzəm]美[ˌbjʊəroʊˈkrætɪzəm]

n. 官僚主义；官僚作风

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The new policy aims to reduce bureaucratism 官僚主义 in government agencies.

新政策旨在减少政府机构中的官僚主义。

2.Many employees feel frustrated by the bureaucratism 官僚主义 that slows down decision-making processes.

许多员工对导致决策过程缓慢的官僚主义感到沮丧。

3.To improve efficiency, the company is working to eliminate bureaucratism 官僚主义 in its operations.

为提高效率，公司正在努力消除其运营中的官僚主义。

4.Critics argue that bureaucratism 官僚主义 hinders innovation in public services.

批评者认为，官僚主义阻碍了公共服务的创新。

5.The new leadership has promised to tackle bureaucratism 官僚主义 head-on.

新领导层承诺将直面官僚主义。

作文

In recent years, the term bureaucratism has gained significant attention in discussions surrounding governance and management. 官僚主义 is often characterized by excessive regulation, rigid procedures, and a lack of flexibility, which can hinder the efficiency and effectiveness of organizations, especially in the public sector. As societies evolve and face new challenges, the implications of bureaucratism become increasingly relevant. The roots of bureaucratism can be traced back to the establishment of bureaucratic systems designed to manage large organizations. While these systems were initially created to streamline processes and ensure accountability, over time, they have often devolved into a culture where adherence to rules takes precedence over innovation and responsiveness. This phenomenon can be observed not only in government institutions but also in corporate environments where hierarchical structures dominate. One of the primary criticisms of bureaucratism is that it stifles creativity and initiative among employees. When individuals are bound by strict protocols and an overwhelming number of forms to fill out, their ability to think outside the box is severely limited. For instance, a public health department might struggle to respond quickly to an outbreak due to layers of approval needed for any action, demonstrating how bureaucratism can lead to delays in critical situations. Moreover, bureaucratism can create a disconnect between decision-makers and those affected by their decisions. In many cases, bureaucrats operate in silos, making choices based on data and reports rather than on real-world experiences and feedback from the ground level. This detachment can result in policies that are ill-suited to the needs of the community, further perpetuating the cycle of inefficiency. To combat the negative effects of bureaucratism, organizations must strive to embrace a more agile and adaptive approach. This could involve flattening organizational hierarchies, encouraging open communication, and empowering employees to take initiative. By fostering a culture of collaboration and innovation, organizations can mitigate the drawbacks of bureaucratism and enhance their overall performance. In conclusion, while bureaucratism may have been established with good intentions, its pervasive nature in both public and private sectors poses significant challenges. Understanding the implications of bureaucratism is crucial for leaders who wish to create responsive and effective organizations. By recognizing the limitations imposed by rigid bureaucratic structures, we can work towards developing systems that prioritize flexibility, creativity, and ultimately, better service delivery to the communities we serve.

近年来，术语官僚主义在关于治理和管理的讨论中引起了显著关注。官僚主义通常以过度的规章制度、僵化的程序和缺乏灵活性为特征，这可能会妨碍组织的效率和有效性，尤其是在公共部门。随着社会的发展和面临新挑战，官僚主义的影响变得越来越相关。 官僚主义的根源可以追溯到旨在管理大型组织的官僚体系的建立。虽然这些系统最初是为了简化流程并确保问责制而创建的，但随着时间的推移，它们常常演变成一种文化，在这种文化中，遵循规则优先于创新和响应能力。这种现象不仅可以在政府机构中观察到，也可以在以等级结构为主导的企业环境中看到。 对官僚主义的主要批评之一是它压制了员工的创造力和主动性。当个人被严格的协议和大量需要填写的表格所束缚时，他们的创新思维能力将受到严重限制。例如，公共卫生部门可能因任何行动所需的多层审批而难以快速应对疫情，这表明官僚主义可能导致关键情况下的延误。 此外，官僚主义可能导致决策者与受其决策影响的人员之间的脱节。在许多情况下，官僚们在孤岛中运作，根据数据和报告做出选择，而不是基于真实世界的经验和来自基层的反馈。这种脱节可能导致不适合社区需求的政策，从而进一步延续低效循环。 为了应对官僚主义的负面影响，组织必须努力采用更灵活和适应性强的方法。这可能涉及扁平化组织层级、鼓励开放沟通以及授权员工主动作为。通过培养合作和创新的文化，组织可以减轻官僚主义的缺点，提高整体绩效。 总之，虽然官僚主义可能是出于良好的意图而建立的，但它在公共和私营部门的普遍存在带来了重大挑战。理解官僚主义的影响对于希望创建响应迅速和有效组织的领导者至关重要。通过认识到僵化的官僚结构所施加的限制，我们可以朝着发展优先考虑灵活性、创造力和最终更好地为我们服务的社区的系统而努力。