castigatory

简明释义

英[ˈkæstɪˌɡeɪtəri]美[ˈkæstəɡəˌtɔːri]

adj. 修订的；惩罚的；斥责的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.And in the network retail go up, consumer has not needed to rely on society of industrial and commercial bureau, consumer and court, they have one each to use castigatory mechanism.

而在网络零售上，消费者已经不需要依靠工商局、消费者协会和法院了，他们有一个自动惩罚机制。

2.And in the network retail go up, consumer has not needed to rely on society of industrial and commercial bureau, consumer and court, they have one each to use castigatory mechanism.

而在网络零售上，消费者已经不需要依靠工商局、消费者协会和法院了，他们有一个自动惩罚机制。

3.Then optimization model with the membership degree is constructed. It is solved by using genetic algorithms with dynamical castigatory function.

然后结合隶属度变量构建优化模型，利用具有动态惩罚函数的遗传算法求解，计算得到各方案的所属类别。

4.The teacher's remarks were not just critical but almost castigatory 惩罚性的, aimed at shaming the students into better behavior.

老师的评论不仅仅是批评，几乎是惩罚性的，旨在让学生感到羞愧，从而改善行为。

5.In the meeting, the manager's castigatory 惩罚性的 tone made it clear that mistakes would not be tolerated.

在会议上，经理的惩罚性的语气明确表明错误是不可容忍的。

6.The film featured a castigatory 惩罚性的 narrative that highlighted the consequences of unethical behavior.

这部电影呈现了一个惩罚性的叙述，突显了不道德行为的后果。

7.His castigatory 惩罚性的 comments during the debate only served to alienate potential allies.

他在辩论中所做的惩罚性的评论只会疏远潜在的盟友。

8.The castigatory 惩罚性的 policies enforced by the school aimed to reduce bullying.

学校实施的惩罚性的政策旨在减少欺凌行为。

作文

In today's society, the concept of punishment has evolved significantly. While some argue that punishment should be strictly retributive, others advocate for a more rehabilitative approach. However, there remains a subset of individuals who believe in a more severe form of discipline, often described as castigatory (惩罚性的). This term refers to actions or policies intended to inflict punishment on wrongdoers, rather than focusing on their rehabilitation or reintegration into society. The idea of castigatory measures can be traced back to ancient civilizations, where punishment was often brutal and public. The objective was to deter others from committing similar offenses through fear. For instance, in medieval Europe, various forms of torture were employed as a means of punishment, highlighting the castigatory nature of justice during that era. This approach, however, raises several ethical questions about the effectiveness and humanity of such practices. In contemporary discussions, the castigatory approach is often criticized for its lack of focus on rehabilitation. Critics argue that merely punishing individuals does not address the root causes of their behavior. Instead, it perpetuates a cycle of crime and punishment without offering any real solutions. For example, many prisoners who are subjected to harsh castigatory environments may emerge from incarceration more hardened and less willing to reintegrate into society. Furthermore, the castigatory mindset can lead to disproportionate penalties for minor offenses. In some jurisdictions, mandatory minimum sentences for certain crimes result in lengthy prison terms that do not correspond to the severity of the offense. This application of castigatory justice can disproportionately affect marginalized communities, exacerbating social inequalities and failing to promote genuine public safety. On the other hand, proponents of castigatory measures argue that they serve as a necessary deterrent against crime. They posit that without the threat of significant punishment, individuals may be more inclined to engage in unlawful behavior. This perspective suggests that a balance must be struck between punishment and rehabilitation, where castigatory elements exist alongside programs aimed at reforming offenders. In recent years, some countries have begun to rethink their approaches to punishment. Movements advocating for restorative justice emphasize healing for victims and accountability for offenders, moving away from purely castigatory methods. This paradigm shift acknowledges that while punishment may be necessary, it should not be the sole focus of the justice system. Instead, integrating rehabilitative efforts can lead to more positive outcomes for both individuals and society as a whole. Ultimately, the challenge lies in finding a balance between castigatory measures and rehabilitative strategies. A justice system that relies solely on punishment risks alienating individuals and failing to address the complexities of human behavior. As we continue to evolve our understanding of justice, it is imperative to consider the implications of castigatory practices and seek alternatives that promote healing and reintegration. In doing so, we can aspire to create a more just and equitable society for all.

在当今社会，惩罚的概念发生了显著变化。虽然一些人认为惩罚应该严格以报复为主，但其他人则提倡更具康复性质的方法。然而，仍然有一部分人相信更严厉的纪律形式，通常被描述为castigatory（惩罚性的）。这个术语指的是旨在对违法者施加惩罚的行为或政策，而不是关注他们的康复或重新融入社会。 castigatory措施的概念可以追溯到古代文明，那时的惩罚往往是残酷和公开的。其目的是通过恐惧来威慑他人不犯类似的罪行。例如，在中世纪欧洲，各种形式的酷刑被用作惩罚手段，突显了那个时代司法的castigatory性质。然而，这种方法引发了关于这些做法的有效性和人道性的若干伦理问题。 在当代讨论中，castigatory方法常常因缺乏对康复的关注而受到批评。批评者认为，仅仅惩罚个人并不能解决他们行为的根本原因。相反，它延续了犯罪与惩罚的循环，而没有提供任何真正的解决方案。例如，许多在严酷的castigatory环境中服刑的囚犯可能会在出狱后变得更加冷酷，不愿意重新融入社会。 此外，castigatory心态可能导致对轻微犯罪的不成比例惩罚。在某些司法管辖区，某些罪行的强制最低刑期导致长时间的监禁，这与罪行的严重性并不相符。这种castigatory司法的应用可能对边缘化社区产生不成比例的影响，加剧社会不平等，并未能促进真正的公共安全。 另一方面，支持castigatory措施的人认为，它们作为对抗犯罪的必要威慑。他们认为，如果没有重大惩罚的威胁，个人可能更倾向于从事非法行为。这种观点表明，必须在惩罚和康复之间找到平衡，其中castigatory元素与旨在改革罪犯的程序并存。 近年来，一些国家开始重新思考其惩罚方法。倡导恢复性司法的运动强调受害者的治疗和罪犯的责任，逐渐摆脱纯粹的castigatory方法。这种范式转变承认，虽然惩罚可能是必要的，但不应成为司法系统的唯一焦点。相反，整合康复努力可以为个人和社会整体带来更积极的结果。 最终，挑战在于在castigatory措施和康复策略之间找到平衡。一个完全依赖惩罚的司法系统有可能疏远个人，并未能解决人类行为的复杂性。随着我们不断发展对司法的理解，审视castigatory实践的影响并寻求促进治疗和重新融入的替代方案至关重要。通过这样做，我们可以期望为所有人创造一个更公正和公平的社会。