cavil

简明释义

英[ˈkæv(ə)l]美[ˈkæv(ə)l]

v. 无端指责；对……吹毛求疵

n. 吹毛求疵的意见

n. （Cavil）（美）凯维乐（人名）

复 数 c a v i l s

第 三 人 称 单 数 c a v i l s

现 在 分 词 c a v i l l i n g 或 c a v i l i n g

过 去 式 c a v i l l e d 或 c a v i l e d

过 去 分 词 c a v i l l e d 或 c a v i l e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Attempts to understand or imagine her inner life tend to be a bit stilted, perhaps because the author is a historian, not a novelist. But this is a small cavil.

可能因为作者是名历史学家而非小说家，所以在尝试理解或想像她的内在生活时有点呆板，但是这是吹毛求疵。

2.Attempts to understand or imagine her inner life tend to be a bit stilted, perhaps because the author is a historian, not a novelist. But this is a small cavil.

可能因为作者是名历史学家而非小说家，所以在尝试理解或想像她的内在生活时有点呆板，但是这是吹毛求疵。

3.Although his composition was flawless, the teacher was always cavil ling at his handwriting.

虽然他的作文写得完美无瑕，但老师对他的书法总是百般挑剔。

4.Anne, far from wishing to cavil at the pleasure, replied, "I can easily believe it."

安妮决不想对这种乐趣吹毛求疵，于是答道：“这我完全可以相信。”

5.To find fault or criticize for petty reasons; cavil .

吹毛求疵找碴子或为了琐屑的原因而批评；

6.A carper will cavil at anything.

爱挑剔的人对什么都挑剔。

7.I don't think this is the time to cavil at the wording of the report.

我认为现在不是对这份报告的措辞吹毛求疵的时候。

8.Let us not cavil too much.

我们不要太吹毛求疵。

9.During the meeting, he tended to cavil at every minor detail, which frustrated his colleagues.

在会议期间，他总是对每一个小细节挑剔，这让他的同事们感到沮丧。

10.The lawyer began to cavil over the terms of the contract, looking for loopholes.

律师开始对合同条款挑剔，寻找漏洞。

11.She didn’t want to cavil at the decision, but she had some legitimate concerns.

她并不想挑剔这个决定，但她有一些合理的担忧。

12.Despite his attempts to explain, she continued to cavil about his reasoning.

尽管他试图解释，她还是继续对他的推理挑剔。

13.It's easy to cavil when you are not the one making the decisions.

当你不是做决定的人时，挑剔是很容易的。

作文

In the realm of debate and discussion, it is not uncommon for individuals to engage in what can be described as cavil. This term refers to making petty or trivial objections, often to undermine an argument without addressing its core substance. The act of caviling can detract from meaningful dialogue, transforming a potentially constructive conversation into a series of nitpicking disputes. Consider a scenario where two friends are discussing the merits of a new policy implemented at their workplace. One friend passionately supports the policy, citing its benefits for employee morale and productivity. However, the other friend begins to cavil about minor details, such as the specific wording used in the policy document or the timing of its announcement. Instead of engaging with the main points raised, this friend focuses on trivial aspects that do little to advance the discussion. This tendency to cavil can be particularly detrimental in professional settings. When colleagues spend more time disputing insignificant details rather than collaborating on solutions, projects can stall, and frustration can mount. It is essential for teams to recognize when a discussion is veering into the territory of cavil and to steer it back toward productive dialogue. Moreover, caviling can occur not only in informal discussions but also in formal debates or legal arguments. In a courtroom, for instance, lawyers may resort to caviling to distract from the main issues at hand. By focusing on minor procedural errors or technicalities, they may attempt to sway the jury's opinion without addressing the substantive evidence presented. This tactic can lead to a skewed perception of the case and ultimately affect the outcome. To combat the negative effects of cavil, it is crucial to foster a culture of constructive criticism and open-mindedness. Encouraging participants in a discussion to focus on the larger picture can help mitigate the impulse to cavil over small details. For example, during team meetings, leaders can set clear agendas that prioritize significant issues and discourage distractions that lead to caviling. Furthermore, individuals should strive to be self-aware of their tendencies to cavil. Reflecting on one’s contributions to discussions can illuminate whether one is genuinely engaging with the topic or merely fixating on inconsequential points. By practicing mindfulness in conversations, people can enhance their communication skills and contribute to more fruitful exchanges. In conclusion, while caviling may seem harmless at first glance, it has the potential to derail important discussions and hinder progress. Recognizing the signs of cavil and actively working to eliminate it from conversations can lead to more effective communication and collaboration. By focusing on substantial issues and fostering a respectful dialogue, we can create an environment where ideas flourish and constructive discourse prevails. Ultimately, avoiding the pitfalls of cavil will allow us to engage more meaningfully with one another, paving the way for innovative solutions and mutual understanding.

在辩论和讨论的领域，个人参与被称为cavil的行为并不罕见。这个词指的是提出琐碎或微不足道的异议，常常是为了削弱一个论点而不触及其核心实质。cavil的行为会削弱有意义的对话，将潜在的建设性谈话转变为一系列挑剔的争论。 考虑这样一个场景：两个朋友正在讨论他们工作场所实施的新政策的优点。其中一个朋友热情支持该政策，引用了它对员工士气和生产力的好处。然而，另一个朋友开始cavil一些小细节，比如政策文件中使用的具体措辞或宣布的时间。这个朋友没有参与主要观点，而是专注于微不足道的方面，这对推动讨论没有什么帮助。 这种cavil的倾向在专业环境中尤其有害。当同事们花更多的时间争论无关紧要的细节而不是合作解决方案时，项目可能会停滞不前，沮丧情绪可能会上升。团队必须认识到，讨论何时偏离了cavil的领域，并将其引导回富有成效的对话。 此外，cavil还可以发生在非正式讨论之外，例如正式辩论或法律辩论。在法庭上，律师可能会诉诸于cavil，以分散注意力，避免关注主要问题。例如，通过关注小的程序错误或技术细节，他们可能试图影响陪审团的意见，而不处理所提出的实质证据。这种策略可能导致案件的偏见感知，并最终影响结果。 为了应对cavil的负面影响，培养建设性批评和开放心态的文化至关重要。在讨论中鼓励参与者关注大局，可以帮助减轻对小细节的cavil冲动。例如，在团队会议期间，领导者可以设定明确的议程，优先考虑重要问题，并阻止导致cavil的干扰。 此外，个人应该努力自我意识到自己倾向于cavil的行为。反思一个人在讨论中的贡献，可以揭示一个人是否真正参与了话题，还是仅仅对无关紧要的观点过于关注。通过在对话中练习正念，人们可以提高沟通技巧，为更有成果的交流做出贡献。 总之，虽然cavil看似无害，但它有可能破坏重要讨论并阻碍进展。识别cavil的迹象并积极努力消除它在对话中的存在，可以导致更有效的沟通与合作。通过关注实质性问题并促进尊重的对话，我们可以创造一个想法蓬勃发展和建设性讨论占主导地位的环境。最终，避免cavil的陷阱将使我们能够更有意义地相互交流，为创新解决方案和相互理解铺平道路。