centralized

简明释义

英[ˈsentrəlaɪzd]美[ˈsentrəlaɪzd]

adj. 集中的；中央集权的

v. 集中（centralize 的过去分词）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Towns in the Northern colonies were centralized and compact.

北方殖民地的城镇是集中而紧凑的。

2.Web 1.0: Centralized Them.

Web 1.0：集中它们。

3.What happens to the centralized electric grid, which took decades and billions of dollars to build, as more and more people become "prosumers", who produce and consume their own energy onsite?

随着越来越多的人成为“产消者”，就地生产和消费自家生产的能源，那么花了几十年时间和数十亿美元才建成的中央电网的命运会如何？

4.Centralized change and configuration management scenario.

集中式变更与配置管理场景。

5.In BPM 2.0, content doesn't remain centralized within the organization.

在BPM 2.0中，内容在组织内不是集中存放的。

6.It assumes that centralized management was critical to dealing with issues caused by sudden population surges, like a strain on limited food supplies.

它假设集中管理对于处理人口激增引起的问题——比如有限的粮食供应造成的压力——是至关重要的。

7.The company implemented a centralized system for managing employee data.

公司实施了一个用于管理员工数据的集中式系统。

8.In a centralized organization, decision-making is concentrated at the top levels.

在一个集中式组织中，决策权集中在高层。

9.The government has moved towards a more centralized approach to public health.

政府已转向更加集中式的公共卫生管理方式。

10.Our IT department prefers a centralized network to ensure better security.

我们的IT部门更喜欢采用集中式网络以确保更好的安全性。

11.The centralized database allows for easier access to information across departments.

这个集中式数据库允许各部门更容易地访问信息。

作文

In today's rapidly evolving world, the concept of governance and management has taken on new dimensions. One of the most significant trends in both public and private sectors is the move towards a more centralized (集中化的) approach. This shift is not merely a change in structure; it represents a fundamental transformation in how organizations operate and interact with their stakeholders. A centralized (集中化的) system is characterized by a concentration of decision-making authority at the top levels of management. This model allows for uniformity in decision-making processes, which can lead to increased efficiency and coherence within an organization. For instance, in a centralized (集中化的) corporate structure, all major decisions are typically made by a small group of executives or a single leader. This can streamline operations and ensure that everyone is aligned with the company's overall vision and strategy. However, the centralized (集中化的) approach also has its drawbacks. One of the primary criticisms is that it can stifle creativity and innovation. When decision-making is concentrated in the hands of a few, employees at lower levels may feel disempowered and less inclined to share their ideas or take initiative. This can lead to a lack of diversity in thought and a slower response to market changes. Organizations that rely heavily on a centralized (集中化的) model may find themselves at a disadvantage in fast-paced industries where adaptability is crucial. Furthermore, a centralized (集中化的) system can create bottlenecks in communication. When information must travel up the hierarchy before it can be acted upon, there can be delays that hinder responsiveness. In contrast, decentralized systems, where decision-making authority is distributed among various levels of the organization, can foster quicker responses and greater employee engagement. This flexibility can be particularly beneficial in environments that require rapid adaptation to new challenges or opportunities. Despite these challenges, many organizations continue to embrace centralized (集中化的) structures due to the perceived benefits of control and coordination. For example, government agencies often operate under centralized (集中化的) models to ensure consistency in policy implementation and regulatory oversight. In such contexts, having a unified command can help maintain order and clarity in complex systems. Moreover, advancements in technology have facilitated the implementation of centralized (集中化的) systems in ways that were not previously possible. With the rise of data analytics and cloud computing, organizations can gather and analyze vast amounts of information from a centralized (集中化的) database. This allows for informed decision-making based on real-time data, enhancing the effectiveness of centralized (集中化的) management practices. In conclusion, the concept of centralized (集中化的) governance and management offers both advantages and disadvantages. While it can lead to greater efficiency and uniformity, it may also hinder innovation and responsiveness. As organizations navigate the complexities of the modern landscape, finding the right balance between centralized (集中化的) and decentralized approaches will be crucial. Ultimately, the choice between these models should be guided by the specific needs of the organization and the environment in which it operates.

在当今快速发展的世界中，治理和管理的概念已经呈现出新的维度。在公共和私营部门中，一个最显著的趋势是朝着更加集中化的（centralized）方法发展。这一转变不仅仅是结构上的变化；它代表了组织运作和与利益相关者互动的根本转型。 集中化的（centralized）系统的特点是决策权在管理的高层集中。这种模式允许决策过程的一致性，从而可能提高组织内部的效率和协调性。例如，在一个集中化的（centralized）公司结构中，所有重大决策通常由一小组高管或单一领导者做出。这可以简化操作，并确保每个人都与公司的整体愿景和战略保持一致。 然而，集中化的（centralized）方式也有其缺点。主要批评之一是它可能抑制创造力和创新。当决策集中在少数人手中时，低层员工可能会感到无能为力，较少倾向于分享他们的想法或采取主动。这可能导致思想多样性的缺乏以及对市场变化的响应速度减缓。依赖于集中化的（centralized）模式的组织可能会在需要快速适应的快节奏行业中处于不利地位。 此外，集中化的（centralized）系统可能会在沟通中造成瓶颈。当信息必须在层级之间传递才能采取行动时，可能会出现延迟，妨碍响应能力。相比之下，分散的系统，在其中决策权分布在组织的各个层次，可以促进更快的响应和更大的员工参与。这种灵活性在需要迅速适应新挑战或机会的环境中特别有利。 尽管面临这些挑战，许多组织仍然继续采用集中化的（centralized）结构，因为控制和协调的潜在好处。例如，政府机构通常在集中化的（centralized）模型下运作，以确保政策实施和监管监督的一致性。在这种背景下，拥有统一的指挥可以帮助在复杂系统中维持秩序和清晰度。 此外，技术的进步使得以前无法实现的集中化的（centralized）系统得以实施。随着数据分析和云计算的兴起，组织可以从一个集中化的（centralized）数据库中收集和分析大量信息。这使得基于实时数据进行知情决策成为可能，提高了集中化的（centralized）管理实践的有效性。 总之，集中化的（centralized）治理和管理概念提供了优缺点。虽然它可以导致更高的效率和一致性，但也可能阻碍创新和响应能力。随着组织应对现代环境的复杂性，在集中化的（centralized）和分散方法之间找到正确的平衡将至关重要。最终，这些模型之间的选择应根据组织的具体需求和其所处的环境来指导。