clampdown

简明释义

英[ˈklæmpdaʊn]美[ˈklæmpdaʊn]

n. 压制；取缔；严禁

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.But that was before the latest satellite clampdown.

但是这是发生在最近的卫星压制政策之前。

2.Passengers understood the clampdown.

乘客对安检表示理解。

3.Both the acceleration and the subsequent clampdown were directed from the centre.

无论是加速还是收紧都由中央主导。

4.They have mounted a preemptive clampdown of a severity rarely seen in recent years.

他们已经采取了先发制人的措施，严厉程度近年罕见。

5.The other big question is the effect of so severe a fiscal clampdown on the economy.

另一个重大问题是，如此严苛地减少财政预算对经济会产生怎样的影响。

6.A clampdown on deficits would intensify the deflationary forces in the economy and would lead to a new and more intense recession.

压缩赤字将加剧经济中的通缩势头，导致一场新的、更为严重的衰退。

7.Turner also called for greater emphasis on liquidity risk, more wide-ranging stress tests and a clampdown on non-bank financial institutions.

Turner还呼吁更重视流动性风险，开展更大范围的压力测试，并严格监管非银行金融机构。

8.This comes after the recent clampdown on middlemen and farmers who are engaging in illegal trade.

这是在最近打击从事非法交易的经纪商和农民之后发出的呼声。

9.The government announced a new clampdown on illegal fishing activities in coastal waters.

政府宣布对沿海水域的非法捕鱼活动进行新的打压。

10.In response to rising crime rates, the city implemented a clampdown on street gangs.

为了应对上升的犯罪率，城市对街头帮派实施了打压。

11.There has been a recent clampdown on tax evasion among large corporations.

最近对大型企业的逃税行为进行了打压。

12.The school enforced a strict clampdown on bullying to ensure a safe environment for all students.

学校对欺凌行为进行了严格的打压，以确保所有学生的安全环境。

13.A clampdown on smoking in public places has led to cleaner air in the city.

在公共场所对吸烟的打压使城市的空气变得更加清新。

作文

In recent years, many governments around the world have implemented a series of measures aimed at controlling various social issues. One of the most significant actions taken by these authorities is the clampdown on illegal activities, which has sparked widespread debate among citizens and experts alike. The term clampdown refers to a strict enforcement of laws or regulations, often in response to rising concerns about public safety, morality, or order. This essay will explore the implications of such measures, particularly focusing on their effectiveness, societal impact, and potential consequences. The primary reason for a government’s clampdown is usually to curb illegal activities that threaten the well-being of its citizens. For instance, in many cities, there has been a noticeable increase in drug-related crimes, prompting local authorities to enhance law enforcement efforts. This often includes increased police presence in high-crime areas, stricter penalties for offenders, and community outreach programs aimed at prevention. Proponents of these measures argue that a strong clampdown can lead to a reduction in crime rates and ultimately create safer neighborhoods. However, the effectiveness of such measures is often debated. Critics argue that a heavy-handed clampdown can lead to unintended consequences, such as the over-policing of certain communities, which may foster distrust between law enforcement and residents. Moreover, when individuals feel that they are being unfairly targeted or treated with suspicion, it can result in social unrest and further exacerbate tensions within society. Therefore, while the intention behind a clampdown may be to protect citizens, the execution of such policies must be carefully considered to avoid alienating the very people they aim to safeguard. Another important aspect to consider is the societal impact of a clampdown. When governments impose strict regulations, it can affect the daily lives of ordinary citizens. For example, during a clampdown on public gatherings, individuals may find themselves unable to participate in cultural events, protests, or community meetings. This restriction can stifle freedom of expression and impede civic engagement, leading to a sense of disenfranchisement among the populace. In democratic societies, where individual rights are highly valued, such measures can be particularly controversial. Furthermore, the long-term consequences of a clampdown can be profound. While immediate results may show a decrease in certain types of crime, the underlying issues that contribute to these problems often remain unaddressed. For instance, poverty, lack of education, and limited access to mental health resources are factors that can drive individuals toward illegal activities. A clampdown might temporarily suppress these activities, but without addressing the root causes, the cycle of crime may continue to persist. In conclusion, while a government’s clampdown on illegal activities is often justified as a necessary measure to ensure public safety, it is essential to approach such actions with caution. Policymakers must balance the need for security with the rights and freedoms of individuals. Effective solutions should not only focus on enforcement but also prioritize community engagement and address the underlying issues that lead to crime. By doing so, societies can work towards sustainable safety that respects the dignity and rights of all citizens, rather than resorting solely to punitive measures.

近年来，世界各地的许多政府实施了一系列旨在控制各种社会问题的措施。这些当局采取的最重要行动之一就是对非法活动的打压，这引发了公民和专家之间的广泛辩论。术语打压指的是对法律或法规的严格执行，通常是为了回应对公共安全、道德或秩序日益增加的担忧。本文将探讨这些措施的影响，特别关注它们的有效性、社会影响和潜在后果。 政府进行打压的主要原因通常是为了遏制威胁公民福祉的非法活动。例如，在许多城市，毒品相关犯罪显著增加，促使地方当局加强执法力度。这通常包括在高犯罪率地区增加警察的存在、对违法者施加更严格的惩罚，以及旨在预防的社区外展项目。这些措施的支持者认为，强有力的打压可以导致犯罪率下降，并最终创造更安全的社区。 然而，这些措施的有效性往往受到争议。批评者认为，过于严厉的打压可能导致意想不到的后果，例如对某些社区的过度警务，这可能会导致执法机构与居民之间的不信任。此外，当个人感到自己被不公正地针对或受到怀疑时，这可能导致社会动荡，并进一步加剧社会内部的紧张关系。因此，尽管打压的初衷可能是保护公民，但这些政策的执行必须经过仔细考虑，以避免疏远他们所旨在保护的人群。 另一个重要方面是打压对社会的影响。当政府施加严格的法规时，可能会影响普通公民的日常生活。例如，在对公共集会的打压期间，个人可能发现自己无法参与文化活动、抗议或社区会议。这种限制可能会扼杀表达自由并阻碍公民参与，导致公众的失落感。在重视个人权利的民主社会中，这类措施尤其具有争议性。 此外，打压的长期后果可能是深远的。尽管短期结果可能显示某些类型的犯罪减少，但导致这些问题的根本原因往往没有得到解决。例如，贫困、缺乏教育和有限的心理健康资源是驱使个人走向非法活动的因素。虽然打压可能暂时抑制这些活动，但如果不解决根本原因，犯罪循环可能会继续存在。 总之，尽管政府对非法活动的打压通常被认为是确保公共安全的必要措施，但在采取此类行动时必须谨慎行事。政策制定者必须在安全需求与个人权利和自由之间取得平衡。有效的解决方案不仅应侧重于执法，还应优先考虑社区参与并解决导致犯罪的根本问题。通过这样做，社会可以朝着可持续安全的方向发展，尊重所有公民的尊严和权利，而不是仅仅依赖惩罚措施。