combatively

简明释义

英[kəmˈbætɪvli]美[kəmˈbætɪvli]

adv. 杀气腾腾地

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Don't trespass onto my property, the neighbor shouted combatively.

“不要侵害我的财产，”邻居气汹汹地吼道。

2.Don't trespass onto my property, the neighbor shouted combatively.

“不要侵害我的财产，”邻居气汹汹地吼道。

3.During the debate, she spoke combatively 好斗地, challenging every point made by her opponent.

在辩论中，她好斗地发言，挑战对手提出的每一个观点。

4.The boxer trained combatively 好斗地, focusing on aggressive techniques to overpower his rivals.

这位拳击手好斗地训练，专注于激进的技术以击败对手。

5.He approached the negotiation combatively 好斗地, unwilling to make any concessions.

他以好斗的态度进行谈判，不愿意做出任何让步。

6.The cat hissed combatively 好斗地 at the dog, ready to defend its territory.

那只猫好斗地对着狗嘶嘶叫，准备捍卫自己的领土。

7.In the meeting, he presented his ideas combatively 好斗地, which created tension among the team members.

在会议上，他以好斗的方式提出自己的想法，这在团队成员之间造成了紧张气氛。

作文

In today's fast-paced world, the ability to engage in discussions and debates is more important than ever. However, the manner in which we approach these conversations can significantly impact their outcome. While some individuals prefer to adopt a friendly and cooperative tone, others may approach discussions in a more aggressive or confrontational way. This latter approach can be described as acting combatively, which means engaging in a manner that is argumentative or hostile. In this essay, I will explore the implications of being combatively inclined during discussions and how it can affect interpersonal relationships and communication effectiveness. When someone is combatively engaged in a conversation, they often prioritize winning the argument over understanding the other person's perspective. This can lead to a breakdown in communication, as the focus shifts from collaboration to confrontation. For instance, consider a workplace meeting where team members are discussing a project. If one member approaches the discussion combatively, they may dismiss others' ideas outright, leading to an environment of defensiveness and resentment. Instead of fostering innovation and teamwork, a combatively charged atmosphere can stifle creativity and discourage open dialogue. Moreover, being combatively inclined can have long-term consequences for personal relationships. Friends and family members who frequently engage in combative discussions may find that their relationships become strained. Over time, constant arguments can erode trust and intimacy, making it difficult for individuals to connect on a deeper level. For example, if a couple regularly argues combatively about trivial matters, they may eventually lose sight of the love and respect that initially brought them together. Healthy relationships thrive on mutual understanding and compromise, rather than on a desire to 'win' every discussion. On the other hand, there are situations where a combatively assertive stance can be beneficial. In some contexts, such as legal disputes or competitive environments, being combatively inclined may be necessary to advocate for one's rights or to defend a position. In these cases, the key lies in balancing assertiveness with respect for others. A person can be combatively assertive while still listening to opposing viewpoints and engaging in constructive dialogue. This approach allows for a more productive exchange of ideas, ultimately leading to better outcomes. To mitigate the negative effects of a combatively driven mindset, individuals can practice active listening and empathy. By genuinely trying to understand the other person's perspective, one can shift the focus from confrontation to collaboration. This not only enhances the quality of the conversation but also fosters a sense of respect and understanding between parties. Additionally, using 'I' statements instead of accusatory 'you' statements can help reduce defensiveness and promote a more open exchange of ideas. In conclusion, while being combatively engaged in discussions can sometimes yield short-term victories, it often comes at the cost of healthy relationships and effective communication. Striking a balance between assertiveness and respect is crucial for fostering productive conversations. By adopting a more collaborative approach and practicing empathy, individuals can move away from a combatively inclined mindset and towards more meaningful and constructive interactions. Ultimately, the goal should be to enhance understanding and cooperation, rather than to simply win arguments.

在当今快节奏的世界中，参与讨论和辩论的能力比以往任何时候都重要。然而，我们接近这些对话的方式会显著影响其结果。虽然一些人更喜欢采取友好和合作的语气，但其他人可能以更具攻击性或对抗性的方式接近讨论。这种后者的方法可以被描述为以好斗的方式行事，这意味着以争论或敌对的方式参与。在这篇文章中，我将探讨在讨论中以好斗的倾向参与的影响，以及它如何影响人际关系和沟通的有效性。 当某人在对话中以好斗的方式参与时，他们通常优先考虑赢得争论，而不是理解对方的观点。这可能导致沟通的破裂，因为重点从合作转向对抗。例如，考虑一个工作场所会议，团队成员正在讨论一个项目。如果一名成员以好斗的方式接近讨论，他们可能会直接驳回其他人的想法，从而导致一种防御和怨恨的环境。相反，充满好斗的氛围的环境可能会扼杀创造力，阻碍开放的对话。 此外，倾向于好斗的行为可能对个人关系产生长期影响。经常以对抗性方式进行讨论的朋友和家人可能会发现他们的关系变得紧张。随着时间的推移，持续的争吵可能会侵蚀信任和亲密感，使个人难以在更深层次上建立联系。例如，如果一对夫妻经常就琐事进行好斗的争论，他们可能最终会失去最初将他们结合在一起的爱与尊重。健康的关系依赖于相互理解和妥协，而不是想要“赢得”每一次讨论。 另一方面，在某些情况下，好斗的自信立场可能是有益的。在某些背景下，例如法律争议或竞争环境中，以好斗的方式倾向可能是必要的，以维护自己的权利或捍卫立场。在这些情况下，关键在于平衡自信与对他人的尊重。一个人可以在仍然倾听对立观点和参与建设性对话的同时，以好斗的方式自信。这种方法允许更富有成效的思想交流，最终导致更好的结果。 为了减轻好斗的心态的负面影响，个人可以练习积极倾听和同理心。通过真诚地试图理解对方的观点，人们可以将重点从对抗转向合作。这不仅增强了对话的质量，还促进了各方之间的尊重和理解。此外，使用“I”语句而不是指责性的“你”语句可以帮助减少防御心理，促进更开放的思想交流。 总之，虽然以好斗的方式参与讨论有时可能带来短期胜利，但它通常以健康的关系和有效的沟通为代价。在自信和尊重之间找到平衡对于促进富有成效的对话至关重要。通过采取更具合作性的方法和练习同理心，个人可以摆脱好斗的心态，走向更有意义和建设性的互动。最终，目标应该是增强理解和合作，而不仅仅是赢得争论。