combativeness

简明释义

英[kəmˈbætɪv.nəs]美[kəmˈbætɪv.nəs]

n. 斗志；好斗性

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.His followers Johann Kaspar Spurzheim and George Combe divided the scalp into areas they labeled with traits such as combativeness, cautiousness, and form perception.

其门生斯珀津姆和库姆将头皮分区，分别贴上标签，表明好斗、谨慎和形成知觉。

2.His followers Johann Kaspar Spurzheim and George Combe divided the scalp into areas they labeled with traits such as combativeness, cautiousness, and form perception.

其门生斯珀津姆和库姆将头皮分区，分别贴上标签，表明好斗、谨慎和形成知觉。

3.It becomes much easier then for each of us to aim every day at conclusive disproofs - at strong inference - without either reluctance or combativeness.

于是，我们每团体每天都很容易把目的集中在最后的反驳证据上，——集中在激烈的推理上- - -既不相互勉强性也不相互争斗。

4.However, the way that women express their combativeness tends to differ from the way men express theirs, she observed.

只是，据她观察，女性表达她们好斗的方式往往和男性表达的方式不同。

5.His natural combativeness made him a fierce competitor in every game.

他天生的好斗性使他在每场比赛中都成为了一个激烈的竞争者。

6.The politician's combativeness during the debate turned off many voters.

这位政治家在辩论中的好斗性让许多选民感到反感。

7.Her combativeness often led to conflicts with her colleagues.

她的好斗性常常导致与同事之间的冲突。

8.In sports, a certain level of combativeness is necessary for success.

在体育比赛中，适度的好斗性是成功所必需的。

9.The team's combativeness on the field impressed the coach.

球队在场上的好斗性给教练留下了深刻的印象。

作文

In today's society, we often encounter individuals who exhibit a strong sense of combativeness. This term refers to an aggressive readiness to fight or argue, and it can manifest in various ways in our daily interactions. While some may view combativeness as a negative trait, it is essential to recognize that it can also stem from a deep-seated passion for one's beliefs and values. Understanding this duality can help us navigate conflicts more effectively. For instance, consider a debate in a classroom setting. Students may display combativeness when defending their viewpoints, passionately arguing their positions. This type of engagement can foster a dynamic learning environment, encouraging critical thinking and the exploration of diverse perspectives. However, if left unchecked, such combativeness can escalate into hostility, leading to a breakdown in communication and collaboration. Moreover, in personal relationships, combativeness can create tension and misunderstandings. When individuals approach disagreements with a combative mindset, they may prioritize winning the argument over understanding their partner's perspective. This often results in hurt feelings and unresolved issues. Therefore, it is crucial to balance combativeness with empathy and active listening. By doing so, we can transform potentially confrontational situations into opportunities for growth and connection. On a broader scale, combativeness can influence societal dynamics. In political discourse, for example, leaders who exhibit a high level of combativeness may polarize their constituents, making it challenging to reach consensus on critical issues. While passion in politics is necessary, excessive combativeness can hinder progress and compromise, ultimately affecting the well-being of the community. Furthermore, the media often amplifies combativeness, portraying conflicts in a sensationalized manner that captivates audiences but may distort the reality of the situation. This can lead to a culture where combativeness is seen as the norm, discouraging constructive dialogue and collaboration. As consumers of media, it is our responsibility to seek out balanced narratives and promote understanding rather than division. In conclusion, combativeness is a complex trait that can have both positive and negative implications. While it can drive passionate discussions and motivate individuals to stand up for their beliefs, unchecked combativeness can lead to conflict and misunderstanding. By fostering a culture of empathy, active listening, and open-mindedness, we can channel our inherent combativeness into constructive outcomes. Ultimately, recognizing the nuances of combativeness allows us to engage more thoughtfully in our interactions, whether in personal relationships, academic settings, or broader societal issues.

在当今社会，我们常常会遇到表现出强烈的好斗性的人。这个词指的是一种积极准备战斗或争论的攻击性，这种特征在我们日常互动中以多种方式表现出来。虽然有些人可能将好斗性视为一种负面特质，但重要的是要认识到，它也可能源于对自己信仰和价值观的深切热情。理解这种二元性可以帮助我们更有效地应对冲突。 例如，考虑一下课堂讨论中的辩论。学生们在捍卫自己的观点时可能会表现出好斗性，热情地辩论自己的立场。这种参与可以促进动态的学习环境，鼓励批判性思维和多样化观点的探索。然而，如果放任不管，这种好斗性可能会升级为敌意，导致沟通与合作的破裂。 此外，在个人关系中，好斗性会造成紧张和误解。当个体以好斗的心态处理分歧时，他们可能会优先考虑赢得争论，而不是理解伴侣的观点。这往往会导致伤害感情和未解决的问题。因此，平衡好斗性与同理心和积极倾听至关重要。通过这样做，我们可以将潜在的对抗性局势转变为成长和联系的机会。 在更广泛的层面上，好斗性可以影响社会动态。例如，在政治话语中，表现出高度好斗性的领导者可能会使其选民两极分化，使在关键问题上达成共识变得困难。虽然政治中的热情是必要的，但过度的好斗性可能会妨碍进步和妥协，最终影响社区的福祉。 此外，媒体往往会放大好斗性，以一种引人注目的方式描绘冲突，吸引观众，但可能扭曲情况的现实。这可能导致一种文化，其中好斗性被视为常态，阻碍建设性对话和合作。作为媒体消费者，我们有责任寻求平衡的叙述，并促进理解而非分裂。 总之，好斗性是一个复杂的特质，可能具有积极和消极的影响。虽然它可以驱动热情的讨论并激励个人捍卫自己的信念，但不受控制的好斗性可能导致冲突和误解。通过培养同理心、积极倾听和开放心态的文化，我们可以将固有的好斗性转化为建设性的结果。最终，认识到好斗性的细微差别使我们能够在个人关系、学术环境或更广泛的社会问题中更深思熟虑地参与互动。