commandeer

简明释义

英[ˌkɒmənˈdɪə(r)]美[ˌkɑːmənˈdɪr]

vt. 征用；霸占，没收；强取

第 三 人 称 单 数 c o m m a n d e e r s

现 在 分 词 c o m m a n d e e r i n g

过 去 式 c o m m a n d e e r e d

过 去 分 词 c o m m a n d e e r e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The government will commandeer ships only in wartime.

政府只在战争时期征用船只。

2.The organisers set off across London, seeking any open-topped vehicle to commandeer.

组织者纷纷出动遍寻伦敦，征募任何趟篷交通工具。

3.The organisers set off across London, seeking any open - topped vehicle to commandeer.

组织者纷纷出动遍寻伦敦，征募任何趟篷交通工具。

4.So, salmon swim upstream to get to their spawning grounds, and lancet flukes commandeer a passing ant, crawl into its brain, and drive it up a blade of grass like an all-terrain vehicle.

鲑鱼会游到河的上游去找寻产卵的地方。而枝双腔吸虫则会钻到蚂蚁的大脑里，操控蚂蚁的大脑，驱赶着蚂蚁爬到草尖上。

5.Here, in the almost deserted village, they could commandeer the priest's house and still leave the prisoners something more than a barn or a wall.

这里，在这几乎空无一人的村庄里，他们征用了牧师家的房子，给囚犯们提供的住处也比牲口棚和一堵墙要好些的地方。

6.Those doubts will not stop the crowds turning out for him, even if he fails to commandeer the Brandenburg Gate as his backdrop.

这些疑虑不会阻止民众出门投票，即使他未能“征用”勃兰登堡门作为自己的演说台。

7.Atta's luggage never made it onto the plane which he would commandeer.

阿塔的行李不知何故未能上飞机。

8.The police had to commandeer a civilian vehicle to chase down the suspect.

警方不得不征用一辆民用车辆来追捕嫌疑犯。

9.During the emergency, the army decided to commandeer local resources for their operations.

在紧急情况下，军方决定征用当地资源进行作战。

10.The captain ordered his crew to commandeer any available boats in the area.

船长命令他的船员征用该地区任何可用的船只。

11.In times of war, governments may commandeer private property for military use.

在战争时期，政府可能会征用私人财产用于军事用途。

12.The firefighters had to commandeer a nearby building to set up their command center.

消防员不得不征用附近的一栋建筑物来建立指挥中心。

作文

In times of crisis, it is not uncommon for governments to commandeer resources to ensure public safety and welfare. The term commandeer refers to the act of taking control of something, often without the owner's consent, usually for military or governmental purposes. This can include anything from vehicles to buildings, and even human resources. For instance, during natural disasters, local authorities may commandeer private vehicles to transport emergency supplies or evacuate residents. While this may seem like an infringement on personal property rights, the urgency of the situation often justifies such actions. The concept of commandeering has historical roots in wartime scenarios where armies would seize civilian assets to support their operations. In many cases, this was seen as a necessary evil to ensure the survival of troops and the success of military campaigns. However, the ethical implications of commandeering are complex and can lead to significant public outcry if not handled transparently. Citizens often expect their government to act in their best interest, but when commandeering occurs without proper communication or compensation, it can erode trust between the public and their leaders. Moreover, commandeering is not limited to physical assets. In some instances, governments may commandeer the services of individuals, especially skilled professionals, during emergencies. For example, during a health crisis such as a pandemic, healthcare workers can be commandeered to serve in critical areas where their expertise is urgently needed. This practice raises questions about individual rights and the responsibilities of professionals to their communities. While many healthcare workers willingly step up during crises, the notion of commandeering their services can lead to debates about fair compensation and working conditions. In modern society, the balance between individual rights and collective needs is continually tested. The act of commandeering can be seen as a necessary measure in extreme situations, but it is essential for authorities to navigate these waters carefully. Clear communication about the reasons behind such actions can help mitigate negative reactions from the public. Furthermore, providing compensation or alternatives for those whose resources are commandeered can help maintain goodwill and cooperation among citizens. In conclusion, while the act of commandeering is often justified in emergencies, it is crucial to approach it with caution and respect for individual rights. The complexities surrounding commandeering highlight the delicate balance that must be maintained between authority and autonomy. As we face future challenges, understanding the implications of commandeering will be vital for both governments and citizens alike, ensuring that actions taken during crises are both effective and ethically sound.

在危机时期，政府通常会征用资源以确保公共安全和福利。术语征用指的是控制某物的行为，通常是在没有所有者同意的情况下进行的，通常用于军事或政府目的。这可以包括从车辆到建筑物，甚至是人力资源的任何东西。例如，在自然灾害期间，当地当局可能会征用私人车辆以运输紧急物资或疏散居民。虽然这似乎侵犯了个人财产权，但情况的紧迫性往往使这种行为合理化。 征用的概念在战争场景中具有历史根源，军队会占用民用资产以支持他们的行动。在许多情况下，这被视为一种必要的邪恶，以确保部队的生存和军事行动的成功。然而，征用的伦理影响是复杂的，如果处理不当，可能会引发公众的强烈反对。公民通常期望他们的政府能以他们的最佳利益行事，但当征用在没有适当沟通或补偿的情况下发生时，可能会破坏公众与领导者之间的信任。 此外，征用不仅限于物理资产。在某些情况下，政府可能会在紧急情况下征用个人的服务，特别是熟练的专业人员。例如，在健康危机如大流行期间，医疗工作者可能会被征用到关键领域，以满足其迫切需要的专业知识。这种做法引发了关于个人权利和专业人员对其社区责任的讨论。虽然许多医疗工作者在危机期间自愿挺身而出，但征用他们的服务的概念可能会引发有关公平补偿和工作条件的辩论。 在现代社会中，个人权利与集体需求之间的平衡不断受到考验。征用的行为在极端情况下可能被视为必要措施，但当局必须谨慎应对这些问题。关于此类行为背后原因的清晰沟通可以帮助减轻公众的负面反应。此外，为那些被征用资源的人提供补偿或替代方案，可以帮助维护公民之间的善意与合作。 总之，尽管在紧急情况下征用的行为通常是合理的，但重要的是以谨慎和尊重个人权利的态度来处理它。围绕征用的复杂性突显了权威与自主权之间必须保持的微妙平衡。随着我们面临未来的挑战，理解征用的影响对于政府和公民来说将至关重要，以确保在危机中采取的行动既有效又符合伦理。