counterclaim

简明释义

英[ˈkaʊntəkleɪm]美[ˈkaʊntərkleɪm]

n. 反诉；反对要求

vt. 反诉

vi. 提起反诉

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The application for adding or changing the claim, or lodges a counterclaim shall be filed before expiration of the time limit for adducing evidence.

当事人增加、变更诉讼请求或者提起反诉的，应当在举证期限届满前提出。

2.The particularity of architecture production results in the inevitability of counterclaim.

建筑产品的特殊性决定了“索赔”的必然性。

3.I put the transparent document bag with counterclaim in it on the table intentionally.

故意将装有反诉状的透明文件袋放在桌上。

4.The counterclaim system has the functional advantage of incorporating and settling the correlative disputes.

反诉制度具有合并解决相关纠纷的功能优势。

5.The second part is a systematic summary of counterclaim.

第二部分是概述，对索赔作了系统性的阐述。

6.The system of counterclaim which undertakes the justness and efficiency is a main institution of civil procedure.

承载着公正与效率双重价值的反诉制度是一项重要的民事诉讼制度。

7.Coordinate functional departments to deal with the non-quality claim from customer, accept and hear a case of counterclaim.

协调公司相关部门做好对客户非质量问题抱怨的处理以及客户的索赔受理工作。

8.The defendant filed a counterclaim 反诉 against the plaintiff for damages.

被告对原告提起了反诉，要求赔偿损失。

9.In response to the lawsuit, the company submitted a counterclaim 反诉 for breach of contract.

作为对诉讼的回应，该公司提交了反诉，指控对方违反合同。

10.The lawyer advised his client to include a counterclaim 反诉 in the legal documents.

律师建议他的客户在法律文件中加入一项反诉。

11.After reviewing the evidence, the judge allowed the counterclaim 反诉 to proceed.

在审查证据后，法官允许该反诉继续进行。

12.They argued that the counterclaim 反诉 was filed too late in the process.

他们辩称该反诉是在程序中提交得太晚。

作文

In the realm of debate and argumentation, understanding the concept of a counterclaim is crucial for effective communication and persuasion. A counterclaim is essentially a claim made to rebut or contradict another claim. It serves as a response to an assertion, providing an alternative perspective or evidence that challenges the original statement. By recognizing and addressing counterclaims, individuals can strengthen their arguments and demonstrate critical thinking skills. For instance, consider a debate about the benefits of renewable energy versus fossil fuels. One side may argue that renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind, are essential for combating climate change. In response, the opposing side might present a counterclaim, stating that the initial costs of implementing renewable energy systems are prohibitively high and that fossil fuels remain more economically viable in the short term. This interaction illustrates the importance of counterclaims in fostering a comprehensive discussion. By acknowledging the counterclaim, the first side can refine its argument, perhaps by providing data on the decreasing costs of renewable technologies or highlighting long-term savings associated with sustainable energy practices. In this way, counterclaims not only challenge existing viewpoints but also encourage deeper exploration of the topic at hand. Moreover, understanding counterclaims is not limited to formal debates; it is equally relevant in everyday discussions. For example, when discussing health issues, one might advocate for a particular diet based on its health benefits. A friend might present a counterclaim, arguing that the diet lacks sufficient scientific backing or that it may not be suitable for everyone. This exchange allows both parties to examine their beliefs critically and potentially arrive at a more informed conclusion. In academic writing, incorporating counterclaims is vital for constructing a balanced argument. When students write essays, they are often encouraged to anticipate potential counterclaims to their thesis statements. By addressing these opposing views, writers can enhance the credibility of their work and demonstrate a thorough understanding of the subject matter. For example, if a student argues that social media has a negative impact on mental health, they might include a counterclaim acknowledging that social media can also foster connections and support networks. This approach not only enriches the essay but also prepares the writer to respond effectively to critiques. Furthermore, the ability to articulate and refute counterclaims is a valuable skill in professional settings, especially in fields like law, marketing, and policy-making. Lawyers must anticipate counterclaims from opposing counsel and prepare their arguments accordingly. Marketers may need to address counterclaims regarding the effectiveness of their products compared to competitors. Policymakers often face counterclaims from various stakeholders when proposing new regulations or initiatives, requiring them to navigate complex discussions and negotiate solutions. In conclusion, the concept of a counterclaim plays a significant role in enhancing discourse across various contexts. Whether in debates, casual conversations, academic writing, or professional environments, recognizing and engaging with counterclaims allows for a more nuanced understanding of issues. It encourages individuals to think critically, articulate their positions clearly, and engage constructively with differing viewpoints. Therefore, mastering the use of counterclaims is essential for anyone seeking to become a more effective communicator and thinker.

在辩论和论证的领域中，理解“反诉”这一概念对于有效沟通和说服至关重要。“反诉”本质上是为了反驳或否定另一项主张而提出的主张。它作为对某一断言的回应，提供了与原始陈述相对立的观点或证据。通过识别和应对反诉，个人可以增强自己的论点，并展示出批判性思维能力。 例如，考虑一个关于可再生能源与化石燃料益处的辩论。一方可能会争辩说，可再生能源，如太阳能和风能，对于应对气候变化至关重要。作为回应，另一方可能会提出一个反诉，声称实施可再生能源系统的初始成本过高，化石燃料在短期内仍然更具经济可行性。 这种互动说明了反诉在促进全面讨论中的重要性。通过承认反诉，第一方可以完善其论点，或许通过提供有关可再生技术成本逐渐下降的数据，或突出与可持续能源实践相关的长期节省。通过这种方式，反诉不仅挑战现有观点，还鼓励对所讨论主题进行更深入的探索。 此外，理解反诉并不限于正式辩论；它在日常讨论中同样相关。例如，当讨论健康问题时，人们可能会基于健康益处倡导某种饮食。朋友可能会提出一个反诉，争辩说这种饮食缺乏足够的科学依据，或者可能不适合每个人。这种交流使双方能够批判性地审视彼此的信念，并可能得出更为知情的结论。 在学术写作中，融入反诉对于构建平衡的论点至关重要。当学生撰写论文时，他们通常被鼓励预见潜在的反诉来回应其论点。通过解决这些对立观点，作者可以增强自己作品的可信度，并展示对主题的透彻理解。例如，如果学生主张社交媒体对心理健康有负面影响，他们可能会包括一个反诉，承认社交媒体也可以促进联系和支持网络。这种方法不仅丰富了论文内容，还准备好作者有效应对批评。 此外，能够清晰表达和反驳反诉在专业环境中也是一项宝贵技能，尤其是在法律、市场营销和政策制定等领域。律师必须预见到来自对方律师的反诉，并相应地准备他们的论点。市场营销人员可能需要解决关于其产品相较于竞争对手的有效性的反诉。政策制定者在提出新法规或倡议时，往往会面临来自各方利益相关者的反诉，这要求他们在复杂的讨论中进行导航并协商解决方案。 总之，“反诉”的概念在增强各种背景下的讨论中发挥着重要作用。无论是在辩论、随意对话、学术写作还是专业环境中，识别和参与反诉都允许对问题有更细致的理解。它鼓励个人进行批判性思考，清晰表达自己的立场，并与不同观点进行建设性互动。因此，掌握使用反诉的能力对于任何希望成为更有效的沟通者和思考者的人来说都是必不可少的。