countervailable

简明释义

英[/ˌkaʊntəˈveɪəbl/]美[/ˌkaʊntərˈveɪəbl/]

adj. 可抵消的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Under U.S. trade remedy law, a countervailable subsidy must be specific to a particular industry.

根据美国贸易救济法，可抵消补贴必须针对特定行业。

2.Under U.S. trade remedy law, a countervailable subsidy must be specific to a particular industry.

根据美国贸易救济法，可抵消补贴必须针对特定行业。

3.The government decided to implement tariffs on goods that were deemed countervailable due to unfair subsidies.

政府决定对被认为由于不公平补贴而属于可反制的商品实施关税。

4.In international trade, it is crucial to identify countervailable practices to ensure a level playing field.

在国际贸易中，识别可反制的做法至关重要，以确保公平竞争。

5.The company filed a complaint against competitors for engaging in countervailable pricing strategies.

该公司对竞争对手采取可反制的定价策略提出了投诉。

6.During the investigation, authorities found that several imports were countervailable due to excessive government support.

在调查过程中，当局发现由于政府支持过度，几种进口商品是可反制的。

7.The report highlighted the countervailable nature of the subsidies provided by the foreign government.

报告强调了外国政府提供的补贴具有可反制的性质。

作文

In the realm of international trade, the concept of subsidies is a double-edged sword. On one hand, they can promote domestic industries and enhance competitiveness; on the other hand, they can lead to unfair advantages in the global market. This is where the term countervailable (可反制的) comes into play. A subsidy is considered countervailable when it is deemed to distort competition by providing an unfair benefit to certain producers over others. This is particularly relevant in cases where countries impose tariffs or other trade barriers to protect their own industries from what they perceive as unfair competition due to foreign subsidies. For instance, if a government provides financial support to its local manufacturers, allowing them to sell products at lower prices than their foreign counterparts, this can trigger disputes in international trade organizations. Countries affected by such practices may seek to challenge these subsidies by arguing that they are countervailable (可反制的) under international trade laws. The World Trade Organization (WTO) has established rules to determine whether a subsidy is indeed countervailable and what measures can be taken in response. The process of determining whether a subsidy is countervailable involves rigorous investigation and analysis. Authorities must assess whether the subsidy is specific to certain enterprises or industries and whether it leads to adverse effects on other countries' industries. If a subsidy is found to be countervailable (可反制的), the affected country may impose countervailing duties to level the playing field. These duties are essentially tariffs imposed on imported goods to offset the benefits gained from the subsidies. The implications of countervailable (可反制的) subsidies extend beyond just economic factors; they can also affect diplomatic relations between countries. When one nation imposes countervailing duties, it may provoke retaliatory measures from the subsidizing country, leading to a cycle of trade tensions. This not only disrupts market dynamics but can also have broader geopolitical consequences. Moreover, the debate surrounding countervailable (可反制的) subsidies raises important questions about fairness and equity in global trade. Developing nations often rely on subsidies to bolster their emerging industries, while developed countries may see these practices as threats to their established markets. This creates a complex landscape where the definition of fairness varies widely depending on one's perspective. Ultimately, understanding the concept of countervailable (可反制的) subsidies is crucial for anyone involved in international trade. It highlights the delicate balance that exists between supporting local industries and maintaining fair competition on a global scale. As we navigate the intricacies of trade policies, it is essential to consider both the economic and ethical dimensions of subsidies, ensuring that our actions contribute to a more equitable trading environment for all nations involved.

在国际贸易领域，补贴的概念是一把双刃剑。一方面，它们可以促进国内产业并增强竞争力；另一方面，它们可能导致全球市场的不公平优势。这就是术语countervailable（可反制的）发挥作用的地方。当补贴被认为通过为某些生产者提供不公平的利益而扭曲竞争时，它就被视为countervailable。这在国家对其本国产业施加关税或其他贸易壁垒以保护其免受外国补贴所带来的不公平竞争时尤为相关。 例如，如果一个政府向其当地制造商提供财政支持，使他们能够以低于外国竞争对手的价格出售产品，这可能会引发国际贸易组织的争议。受此类行为影响的国家可能会寻求挑战这些补贴，理由是它们在国际贸易法下是countervailable（可反制的）。世界贸易组织（WTO）已建立规则，以确定补贴是否确实是countervailable，以及可以采取什么措施作为回应。 确定补贴是否countervailable（可反制的）的过程涉及严格的调查和分析。有关当局必须评估补贴是否特定于某些企业或行业，以及它是否对其他国家的产业产生不利影响。如果发现某项补贴是countervailable（可反制的），受影响的国家可能会征收反补贴税，以平衡竞争环境。这些税实际上是对进口商品征收的关税，以抵消获得的补贴带来的好处。 countervailable（可反制的）补贴的影响不仅限于经济因素；它们还可能影响国家之间的外交关系。当一个国家征收反补贴税时，可能会激起补贴国的报复性措施，从而导致贸易紧张局势的循环。这不仅扰乱了市场动态，还可能产生更广泛的地缘政治后果。 此外，围绕countervailable（可反制的）补贴的辩论提出了关于全球贸易中公平和公正的重要问题。发展中国家通常依赖补贴来支持其新兴产业，而发达国家可能将这些做法视为对其既有市场的威胁。这创造了一个复杂的格局，在这个格局中，对公平的定义因人的立场而异。 最终，理解countervailable（可反制的）补贴的概念对于任何参与国际贸易的人来说都是至关重要的。它突显了支持地方产业与维持全球公平竞争之间存在的微妙平衡。在我们处理贸易政策的复杂性时，有必要考虑补贴的经济和伦理维度，确保我们的行动有助于为所有参与国家创造一个更加公平的贸易环境。