crackdown

简明释义

英[ˈkrækdaʊn]美[ˈkrækdaʊn]

n. 打击，镇压

复 数 c r a c k d o w n s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The police crackdown on speeders achieved its purpose.

警察对违章超速驾驶者的制裁实现了它的目的。

2.George Bush confused tax cuts with tax reform. Mr Obama seems to think reform lies in a tax crackdown; but he is wrong, too.

之前的乔治·布什混淆了减税和税改，而现在的奥巴马似乎认为税改在于税务封堵，显然，他们都错了。

3.George Bush confused tax cuts with tax reform. Mr Obama seems to think reform lies in a tax crackdown; but he is wrong, too.

之前的乔治·布什混淆了减税和税改，而现在的奥巴马似乎认为税改在于税务封堵，显然，他们都错了。

4.Whatever its intrinsic merits, the timing of the crackdown is unfortunate.

这次的制裁即便有内在的优点，但选择时机不当。

5.This led to another crackdown.

这就导致了另一个沉痛的打击。

6.Police hustling a group of defendants into court during the height of the crackdown.

在打击犯罪的高峰期，法警们押着一群被告人快速进入法庭。

7.A crackdown could come at any time. It is also hard for them to mature into more permanent structures.

打压随时可能到来，这使它们很难成熟为长久的机构。

8.The nationwide crackdown reveals that the processing of “gutter oil” has formed an industrial chain.

此次全国范围内的围剿暴露出地沟油的加工已形成了一条产业链。

9.Those hoping for a broader crackdown on business-process patents will also be disappointed.

那些希望对业务流程的专利权压制力度更宽的人也会很失望。

10.The government announced a new crackdown on illegal drug trafficking.

政府宣布对非法毒品贩运进行新的打击。

11.Local authorities are implementing a crackdown on noise pollution in residential areas.

当地政府正在对居民区的噪音污染进行打击。

12.There has been a recent crackdown on unlicensed street vendors in the city.

最近城市对无证街头小贩进行了打击。

13.The police launched a crackdown on gang violence after several incidents were reported.

在报告了几起事件后，警方对帮派暴力展开了打击。

14.Following public outcry, the city initiated a crackdown on littering.

在公众的强烈反对下，市政府启动了对乱扔垃圾的打击。

作文

In recent years, many governments around the world have initiated a strict crackdown on various forms of illegal activities. This crackdown usually targets drug trafficking, human trafficking, and organized crime, aiming to restore law and order in society. The term crackdown refers to a severe and sudden enforcement action taken by authorities against unlawful behavior. It is often characterized by increased police presence, stricter penalties, and heightened surveillance measures. For instance, in many cities plagued by drug-related violence, local law enforcement agencies have launched a comprehensive crackdown on drug dealers and users. This has led to numerous arrests and the confiscation of large quantities of illegal substances. While these actions are intended to deter criminal activities, they also raise questions about civil liberties and the potential for abuse of power by law enforcement. Critics argue that a heavy-handed crackdown may disproportionately affect marginalized communities, leading to racial profiling and unjust treatment. On the other hand, supporters of such measures believe that a firm crackdown is necessary to protect citizens from the dangers posed by organized crime and drug abuse. Moreover, the effectiveness of a crackdown can vary significantly depending on the context and execution. In some cases, a well-planned crackdown can lead to a significant decrease in crime rates and a sense of safety among residents. However, in other instances, it may simply push criminal activities underground, making them harder to detect and combat. Another important aspect of a crackdown is its impact on public perception. When a government takes decisive action against crime, it can enhance its legitimacy and gain public support. Citizens often feel safer knowing that authorities are actively working to address crime. However, if a crackdown is perceived as ineffective or overly aggressive, it can lead to public outcry and loss of trust in the government. In conclusion, a crackdown is a powerful tool used by governments to combat illegal activities and enhance public safety. While it can yield positive results, it must be implemented with caution to ensure that it does not infringe upon individual rights or disproportionately target certain groups. Balancing the need for security with the preservation of civil liberties is essential for any successful crackdown. As societies continue to grapple with issues of crime and safety, the debate over the best methods to achieve these goals will undoubtedly persist. Ultimately, a thoughtful approach to law enforcement can help create a safer environment for all citizens without compromising their fundamental rights.

近年来，世界各地的许多政府都启动了对各种非法活动的严格打压。这种打压通常针对毒品贩运、人口贩运和有组织犯罪，旨在恢复社会的法律和秩序。术语打压指的是当局对非法行为采取的严厉和突然的执法行动。它通常表现为警察存在增加、惩罚措施更严格以及监视措施加强。 例如，在许多受到毒品相关暴力困扰的城市，当地执法机构发起了一项全面的打压，针对毒品交易者和使用者。这导致了大量逮捕和大量非法物质的查获。虽然这些行动旨在威慑犯罪活动，但它们也引发了关于公民自由和执法权力滥用潜在风险的问题。 批评者认为，强硬的打压可能会对边缘化社区产生不成比例的影响，导致种族定性和不公正对待。另一方面，支持者相信，坚决的打压对于保护公民免受有组织犯罪和毒品滥用带来的危险是必要的。 此外，打压的有效性因背景和执行情况而异。在某些情况下，精心策划的打压可以显著降低犯罪率，让居民感到安全。然而，在其他情况下，它可能只是将犯罪活动推向地下，使其更难以发现和打击。 打压的另一个重要方面是其对公众认知的影响。当政府果断采取行动打击犯罪时，可以增强其合法性并获得公众支持。公民往往会因为当局积极努力解决犯罪问题而感到更安全。然而，如果打压被认为无效或过于激进，可能会引发公众抗议和对政府信任的丧失。 总之，打压是政府用来打击非法活动和增强公共安全的强大工具。虽然它可以产生积极的结果，但必须谨慎实施，以确保不侵犯个人权利或不成比例地针对某些群体。在任何成功的打压中，平衡安全需求与维护公民自由至关重要。随着社会继续应对犯罪和安全问题，关于实现这些目标的最佳方法的辩论无疑会持续下去。最终，对执法的深思熟虑的方法可以帮助为所有公民创造一个更安全的环境，而不损害他们的基本权利。