credentialism

简明释义

英[krɪˈdenʃəlɪzəm]美[krɪˈdenʃəlɪzəm]

n. 资格主义，文凭主义

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Creeping credentialism means anyone without a degree competes at a disadvantage with graduates for jobs that never needed a degree before.

逐渐盛行的文凭主义者就意味着没有文凭的任何人都要带着劣势与大学生们竞争那些之前不需要学位就能得到的工作。

2.Creeping credentialism means anyone without a degree competes at a disadvantage with graduates for jobs that never needed a degree before.

逐渐盛行的文凭主义者就意味着没有文凭的任何人都要带着劣势与大学生们竞争那些之前不需要学位就能得到的工作。

3.Many employers have fallen into the trap of credentialism, placing too much emphasis on degrees rather than skills.

许多雇主陷入了资格主义的陷阱，过于强调学位而不是技能。

4.The rise of credentialism in the job market has made it difficult for talented individuals without formal qualifications to find work.

在就业市场上，资格主义的兴起使得没有正式资格的优秀人才很难找到工作。

5.Critics argue that credentialism leads to a narrow definition of competence, ignoring practical experience.

批评者认为，资格主义导致对能力的狭隘定义，忽视了实践经验。

6.In academia, credentialism can create barriers for innovative thinkers who may not have traditional qualifications.

在学术界，资格主义可能会为那些没有传统资格的创新思想家设置障碍。

7.Some industries are starting to push back against credentialism by valuing skills and experience over formal education.

一些行业开始反对资格主义，更重视技能和经验而非正式教育。

作文

In today's competitive job market, the concept of credentialism has become increasingly prevalent. Credentialism refers to the reliance on formal qualifications and degrees as a measure of a person's ability or potential. While having a degree or certification can certainly indicate a certain level of knowledge or skill, the overemphasis on these credentials often leads to a narrow view of what constitutes competence. This essay will explore the implications of credentialism in various sectors, including education, employment, and personal development. Firstly, in the realm of education, credentialism can create an environment where students feel pressured to achieve high grades and obtain advanced degrees, sometimes at the expense of genuine learning and intellectual curiosity. The focus on grades and diplomas can overshadow the importance of critical thinking, creativity, and problem-solving skills. For instance, many employers report that while candidates may possess impressive degrees, they often lack the practical skills necessary to succeed in the workplace. This disconnect highlights the limitations of credentialism and raises questions about the effectiveness of traditional educational systems. Moreover, credentialism can perpetuate social inequalities. Individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds may not have the same access to quality education or resources needed to attain prestigious qualifications. As a result, they may be unfairly excluded from job opportunities simply because they do not possess the 'right' credentials. This systemic issue underscores the need for a more inclusive approach to evaluating talent and potential, one that recognizes diverse experiences and skills beyond formal qualifications. In the employment sector, credentialism often leads to a hiring process that prioritizes degrees over experience. Many companies have strict requirements for educational qualifications, which can eliminate highly capable candidates who may have gained their skills through non-traditional means, such as self-study, apprenticeships, or hands-on experience. This trend is particularly evident in fields like technology and entrepreneurship, where innovation and practical skills can be far more valuable than a degree. Employers should consider adopting a more holistic approach to hiring, valuing practical experience and unique perspectives alongside formal credentials. Furthermore, credentialism can impact personal development and self-esteem. Individuals may feel inadequate or less competent if they do not hold certain degrees or certifications, leading to a cycle of self-doubt and discouragement. This mentality can stifle personal growth and discourage people from pursuing their passions or exploring new opportunities. It is essential to foster an environment where individuals are encouraged to develop their skills and talents, regardless of their formal educational background. In conclusion, while credentialism serves as a useful shorthand for assessing qualifications, its overreliance can have detrimental effects on education, employment, and personal development. As society continues to evolve, it is crucial to recognize and value diverse forms of knowledge and experience. By moving beyond the confines of credentialism, we can create a more equitable and innovative landscape that truly reflects the capabilities of individuals. Emphasizing skills, experience, and character over mere credentials will not only benefit individuals but also enrich organizations and society as a whole.

在当今竞争激烈的就业市场中，credentialism的概念变得越来越普遍。Credentialism指的是依赖正式的资格和学位作为衡量一个人能力或潜力的标准。虽然拥有学位或证书无疑可以表明某种程度的知识或技能，但对这些资格的过度强调往往导致了对能力构成的狭隘看法。本文将探讨credentialism在教育、就业和个人发展等各个领域的影响。 首先，在教育领域，credentialism可能会造成一种环境，使学生感到必须获得高分和高级学位，有时以牺牲真正的学习和智力好奇心为代价。对成绩和文凭的关注可能会掩盖批判性思维、创造力和解决问题能力的重要性。例如，许多雇主报告称，尽管候选人可能拥有令人印象深刻的学位，但他们往往缺乏在工作场所取得成功所需的实践技能。这种脱节突显了credentialism的局限性，并引发了关于传统教育系统有效性的质疑。 此外，credentialism可以加剧社会不平等。来自弱势背景的个人可能没有同样的机会获得优质教育或获得获得名望资格所需的资源。因此，他们可能会因为没有拥有“正确”的资格而被不公正地排除在工作机会之外。这个系统性问题强调了需要一种更具包容性的方法来评估人才和潜力，这种方法承认超越正式资格的多样化经验和技能。 在就业领域，credentialism往往导致招聘过程优先考虑学位而非经验。许多公司对教育资格有严格要求，这可能会排除那些通过非传统方式获得技能的高能力候选人，例如自学、学徒制或实践经验。这一趋势在技术和创业等领域尤为明显，在这些领域，创新和实践技能可能比学位更有价值。雇主应该考虑采取更全面的招聘方法，将实践经验和独特视角与正式资格并重。 此外，credentialism还会影响个人发展和自尊心。如果个人没有某些学位或证书，可能会感到不充分或能力不足，从而导致自我怀疑和沮丧的循环。这种心态可能会扼杀个人成长，并使人们不愿追求自己的激情或探索新机会。培养一种环境，使个人被鼓励发展自己的技能和才能，无论其正式教育背景如何，是至关重要的。 总之，虽然credentialism作为评估资格的简便方式，但其过度依赖可能对教育、就业和个人发展产生不利影响。随着社会的不断发展，至关重要的是认识到并重视多样化的知识和经验形式。超越credentialism的限制，我们可以创造一个更加公平和创新的环境，真正反映个体的能力。强调技能、经验和品格而非单纯的资格，不仅将使个人受益，也将丰富组织和整个社会。