criticaster

简明释义

英[/ˈkrɪtɪˌkæstər/]美[/ˈkrɪtɪˌkæstər/]

n. 小批评家；无价值的批评家

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.All criticaster talk for hours about the system and who should play left or right, totally ignorant of the real problem.

所有不停谈论着阵型以及谁要打左路还是右路的批评家们都忽略了真正的问题。

2.All criticaster talk for hours about the system and who should play left or right, totally ignorant of the real problem.

所有不停谈论着阵型以及谁要打左路还是右路的批评家们都忽略了真正的问题。

3.The film review was harsh, but the author was merely a criticaster 评论家 with no real understanding of cinema.

这篇电影评论很苛刻，但作者不过是一个criticaster 评论家，对电影没有真正的理解。

4.In the world of art, it's easy to dismiss a criticaster 评论家 as someone who lacks depth in their analysis.

在艺术界，轻易地将一个criticaster 评论家视为缺乏深度分析的人是很容易的。

5.He called out the criticaster 评论家 for not providing constructive feedback on the project.

他指责那个criticaster 评论家没有对项目提供建设性的反馈。

6.Many criticaster 评论家 focus on nitpicking rather than appreciating the overall effort put into the work.

许多criticaster 评论家专注于挑剔，而不是欣赏作品所付出的整体努力。

7.The online forum was filled with criticaster 评论家 who seemed more interested in tearing down others than offering insights.

这个在线论坛充满了criticaster 评论家，他们似乎更感兴趣于抨击别人，而不是提供见解。

作文

In the realm of literature and art, criticism plays a crucial role in shaping public perception and influencing the trajectory of creative works. However, not all critics are created equal. Among them exists a category that can be aptly described as a criticaster, a term that refers to someone who engages in criticism but lacks the depth, understanding, or expertise necessary to provide meaningful insights. This essay will explore the implications of having criticasters in the world of art and literature, highlighting the potential consequences of their influence on both creators and audiences. To begin with, it is essential to understand the characteristics that define a criticaster. Unlike a seasoned critic who possesses a wealth of knowledge about their subject matter, a criticaster often relies on superficial observations and personal biases. Their critiques may stem from a desire for attention or a misguided sense of superiority rather than a genuine passion for art or literature. As a result, their commentary can lack substance and fail to engage with the complexities of the work being examined. One significant consequence of the presence of criticasters is the potential for misinformation. In an age where social media amplifies voices, a poorly informed critique can spread rapidly, influencing public opinion without any foundation in fact or thoughtful analysis. For instance, a criticaster may dismiss a novel as 'boring' simply because it does not conform to popular trends, thereby discouraging potential readers from exploring a work that may offer profound insights or emotional depth. This can lead to a homogenization of artistic expression, where only those works that appeal to the lowest common denominator gain traction. Moreover, criticasters can create an environment of fear among artists and writers. When creators are aware that their work might be subjected to flippant or harsh criticism from those who do not truly understand their craft, they may become hesitant to take risks or innovate. This stifling effect can hinder the evolution of art and literature, as creators may opt for safer, more commercially viable options instead of pushing boundaries and exploring new ideas. The presence of criticasters thus poses a threat to the diversity and richness of cultural expression. On the other hand, it is important to recognize that not all criticism is detrimental. Constructive criticism can serve as a valuable tool for growth and improvement. However, when the voice of the criticaster drowns out those of knowledgeable critics, the balance is disrupted. A community that values informed critique fosters an environment where artists can thrive, learn from feedback, and evolve their craft. In contrast, the prevalence of criticasters can lead to a toxic atmosphere where fear and insecurity overshadow creativity. In conclusion, while criticism is an inherent part of the artistic process, the emergence of criticasters poses significant challenges to both creators and audiences. Their lack of depth and understanding can perpetuate misinformation, stifle innovation, and create an unhealthy environment for artistic expression. It is crucial for audiences to cultivate discernment and seek out informed critiques that enrich their understanding of art and literature. By doing so, we can elevate the discourse surrounding creative works and ensure that the voices of true critics are heard above the noise of the criticasters.

在文学和艺术的领域，批评在塑造公众认知和影响创作作品的发展轨迹中扮演着至关重要的角色。然而，并非所有的批评者都是平等的。在他们之中，有一个类别可以恰当地被描述为criticaster，这个术语指的是那些参与批评但缺乏必要的深度、理解或专业知识，以提供有意义见解的人。本文将探讨在艺术和文学世界中拥有criticaster的影响，强调他们对创作者和观众的潜在影响。 首先，了解定义criticaster的特征是至关重要的。与拥有丰富知识的资深批评家不同，criticaster往往依赖于肤浅的观察和个人偏见。他们的批评可能源于对关注的渴望或一种误导的优越感，而不是对艺术或文学的真正热情。因此，他们的评论可能缺乏实质性，未能与被审视作品的复杂性进行互动。 criticaster存在的一个重大后果是潜在的错误信息。在社交媒体放大声音的时代，缺乏信息的批评可以迅速传播，影响公众舆论，而没有任何事实基础或深思熟虑的分析。例如，一位criticaster可能会因为一本小说不符合流行趋势而简单地将其视为“无聊”，从而阻止潜在读者探索可能提供深刻见解或情感深度的作品。这可能导致艺术表现的同质化，只有那些迎合最低共同点的作品才能获得关注。 此外，criticaster还可能在艺术家和作家之间创造出一种恐惧的环境。当创作者意识到他们的作品可能会受到那些并不真正理解他们工艺的人的轻率或严厉批评时，他们可能会对冒险或创新变得犹豫。这种抑制效应可能阻碍艺术和文学的发展，因为创作者可能选择更安全、更具商业价值的选项，而不是突破界限和探索新思想。因此，criticaster的存在对文化表达的多样性和丰富性构成了威胁。 另一方面，重要的是要认识到并非所有的批评都是有害的。建设性的批评可以作为成长和改进的宝贵工具。然而，当criticaster的声音淹没了知识丰富的批评家的声音时，这种平衡就会被打破。一个重视知情批评的社区营造出一种艺术家可以蓬勃发展、从反馈中学习并发展他们工艺的环境。相反，criticaster的普遍存在可能导致一种有毒的氛围，在这种氛围中，恐惧和不安压倒了创造力。 总之，虽然批评是艺术过程固有的一部分，但criticaster的出现对创作者和观众都构成了重大挑战。他们缺乏深度和理解可能会传播错误信息，抑制创新，并为艺术表达创造出不健康的环境。观众必须培养鉴别力，寻求丰富他们对艺术和文学理解的知情批评。通过这样做，我们可以提升围绕创作作品的讨论，确保真正批评者的声音在criticaster的噪音中被听到。