cronies

简明释义

英[ˈkrəʊ.niz]美[ˈkroʊ.niz]

n. 密友（crony 的复数）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Grandfather often toddled round to the club for a chat with his cronies.

祖父时常摇摇晃晃地到俱乐部去找他的老朋友聊天。

2.Grandfather often toddled round to the club for a chat with his cronies.

祖父时常摇摇晃晃地到俱乐部去找他的老朋友聊天。

3.Mr Ozawa's cronies may feel they have no option but to support him.

小泽的亲信可能感到他们没得选择，只能支持他。

4.And you and your cronies. think I'm some sort of a pity case.

我过得很好，而你们这些狂妄的人却以为我很可怜。

5.The politician was often seen dining with his wealthy cronies.

这位政治家常常被看到与他富有的密友共进晚餐。

6.After winning the lottery, he took a vacation with his cronies.

中大奖后，他和他的朋友们一起去度假。

7.The business owner relied heavily on his cronies for advice.

这位企业主非常依赖他的伙伴们提供建议。

8.She felt betrayed when her cronies didn't support her during the crisis.

在危机中，她感到被背叛，因为她的朋友们没有支持她。

9.His cronies helped him organize the surprise party.

他的好友们帮助他组织了惊喜派对。

作文

In the world of politics and business, the term cronies refers to close friends or companions, particularly those who are part of a group that often shares power or influence. These individuals may not always be qualified for their positions, but their relationships with those in power can significantly affect decision-making processes. The phenomenon of cronies is not new; it has existed throughout history, often leading to corruption and favoritism. For instance, many political leaders have been known to appoint their cronies to key positions within their administrations, prioritizing loyalty over merit. This practice can undermine public trust and lead to inefficiencies within government and organizations. One notable example of cronies in politics can be seen in various administrations around the world. In some cases, leaders have surrounded themselves with individuals who share their ideologies and interests, creating an echo chamber that stifles dissent and innovation. This can result in policies that do not reflect the needs or desires of the broader population. As a consequence, the public may feel alienated and disillusioned, believing that their voices are not being heard. Moreover, the presence of cronies can also lead to economic disparities. When businesses are awarded contracts or benefits based on personal relationships rather than competitive bidding, it creates an uneven playing field. Smaller companies that lack connections may struggle to compete, ultimately harming the economy and limiting opportunities for growth. This dynamic can perpetuate a cycle of privilege, where only those with the right connections succeed. The impact of cronies extends beyond politics and business; it can also infiltrate social circles. In schools and communities, there can be cliques that form around shared interests or backgrounds, leading to exclusion and division. This can create an environment where individuals feel pressured to conform to the norms of their cronies, stifling individuality and creativity. Addressing the issue of cronies requires a multifaceted approach. Transparency in governance and business practices is crucial. By implementing checks and balances, organizations can help ensure that decisions are made based on merit rather than personal relationships. Additionally, fostering an inclusive culture that values diverse perspectives can mitigate the influence of cronies. Encouraging open dialogue and critical thinking can lead to more innovative solutions and a stronger sense of community. Ultimately, while having close friends and allies is natural, it is essential to recognize the potential pitfalls of surrounding oneself with cronies. Striking a balance between loyalty and accountability is vital for fostering healthy relationships in both personal and professional spheres. By being aware of the implications of cronies and striving for inclusivity, we can work towards a society that values fairness and integrity, ensuring that everyone has a voice and an opportunity to succeed. Only then can we hope to create environments where meritocracy prevails over nepotism, and where the best ideas thrive, regardless of personal connections.

在政治和商业的世界中，术语cronies指的是密友或伙伴，特别是那些属于一个经常分享权力或影响力的团体的人。这些人可能并不总是有资格担任他们的位置，但他们与权力者的关系可以显著影响决策过程。cronies现象并不新鲜；它在历史上一直存在，往往导致腐败和偏袒。例如，许多政治领导人被知道将他们的cronies任命到他们政府中的关键职位，优先考虑忠诚而非能力。这种做法可能削弱公众信任，并导致政府和组织内部的低效率。 在政治中，cronies的一个显著例子可以在世界各地的各种政府中看到。在某些情况下，领导者将自己周围围绕着与他们共享意识形态和利益的人，创造出一个窒息异议和创新的回音室。这可能导致的政策并不反映更广泛民众的需求或愿望。因此，公众可能会感到疏离和失望，认为他们的声音没有得到倾听。 此外，cronies的存在也可能导致经济差距。当企业根据个人关系而非竞争性投标获得合同或利益时，这就造成了一个不平等的竞争环境。缺乏关系的小公司可能难以竞争，最终损害经济并限制增长机会。这种动态可能会延续特权的循环，只有那些拥有正确关系的人才能成功。 cronies的影响不仅限于政治和商业；它还可以渗透到社交圈。在学校和社区中，可能会形成围绕共同兴趣或背景的派系，导致排斥和分裂。这可能会创造一种环境，使个人感到被迫遵循他们的cronies的规范，从而抑制个性和创造力。 解决cronies问题需要多方面的方法。治理和商业实践的透明度至关重要。通过实施制衡机制，组织可以帮助确保决策是基于能力而非个人关系。此外，促进一种重视多元化视角的包容文化可以减轻cronies的影响。鼓励开放对话和批判性思维可以带来更具创新性的解决方案和更强的社区感。 最终，虽然拥有亲密的朋友和盟友是自然的，但认识到围绕自己建立cronies的潜在陷阱是至关重要的。在个人和职业领域之间找到忠诚与问责之间的平衡对于促进健康关系至关重要。通过意识到cronies的影响并努力追求包容性，我们可以朝着一个重视公平和诚信的社会努力，确保每个人都有发声和成功的机会。只有这样，我们才能希望创造出一个以能力为主导而非裙带关系的环境，在这里，最好的想法能够蓬勃发展，无论个人关系如何。