declassify

简明释义

英[diːˈklæsɪfaɪ]美[diːˈklæsɪfaɪ]

v. 解密（信息、文件），撤销（消息、文件）的密级；降低……的等级

第 三 人 称 单 数 d e c l a s s i f i e s

现 在 分 词 d e c l a s s i f y i n g

过 去 式 d e c l a s s i f i e d

过 去 分 词 d e c l a s s i f i e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.To determine, change or declassify a state secret of an organ or entity, the handling person shall put forward a specific proposal subject to the examination and approval of the state secret decider.

机关、单位确定、变更和解除本机关、本单位的国家秘密，应当由承办人提出具体意见，经定密责任人审核批准。

2.To determine, change or declassify a state secret of an organ or entity, the handling person shall put forward a specific proposal subject to the examination and approval of the state secret decider.

机关、单位确定、变更和解除本机关、本单位的国家秘密，应当由承办人提出具体意见，经定密责任人审核批准。

3.The essay analyses the structure of financial account system on the net, put forward the course of encipher and declassify in the data transmission course.

文中分析了网上资金结算系统的结构，提出了数据传输过程中加密和解密的流程。

4.DES declassified document source code, can declassify any type of any size document.

DES解密文件源代码，可以解密任何类型的任何大小的文件。

5.The government decided to declassify the documents related to the investigation.

政府决定解密与调查相关的文件。

6.After years of secrecy, they finally declassify the information about the operation.

经过多年的保密，他们终于解密了关于该行动的信息。

7.The agency will declassify certain files to promote transparency.

该机构将解密某些文件以促进透明度。

8.It is rare for military secrets to be declassify at such a rapid pace.

军事机密以如此快速的速度被解密是很少见的。

9.The president announced plans to declassify documents related to UFO sightings.

总统宣布计划解密与UFO目击事件相关的文件。

作文

The concept of declassify has gained significant attention in recent years, especially in the context of government transparency and public access to information. To declassify means to officially remove the classification status of a document or piece of information, making it accessible to the public. This process is crucial for fostering accountability and trust between the government and its citizens. In many democratic societies, there is a growing demand for transparency regarding governmental actions, particularly those that involve national security or intelligence operations. Historically, many documents related to military operations and intelligence activities were kept classified to protect sensitive information. However, as time passes and the context changes, the rationale for keeping certain documents classified may diminish. When governments choose to declassify these documents, they allow scholars, journalists, and the general public to examine past decisions and actions, which can lead to a more informed citizenry. One notable example of declassifying is the release of documents related to the Vietnam War. For decades, many aspects of the war were shrouded in secrecy, leading to public distrust and speculation. The declassifying of these documents revealed the complexities and controversies surrounding the war, providing valuable insights into the decision-making processes that occurred at the highest levels of government. Such revelations can spark important discussions about ethics, governance, and the responsibilities of leaders. In addition to historical documents, the declassifying process can also apply to ongoing investigations or current events. For instance, when allegations of misconduct arise within government agencies, there is often a push for transparency. Advocates argue that declassifying relevant information can help restore public trust and ensure accountability. However, this process can be contentious, as some officials may argue that certain information should remain classified to protect national security interests. The balance between transparency and security is a delicate one. On one hand, declassifying information can empower citizens and promote democratic values; on the other hand, it can also pose risks if sensitive information falls into the wrong hands. This tension highlights the importance of establishing clear guidelines and criteria for what should be declassifyd and when. Many governments have established review boards and processes to evaluate requests for declassifying documents, ensuring that such decisions are made thoughtfully and responsibly. In conclusion, the act of declassifying information plays a vital role in promoting transparency and accountability within government institutions. As society continues to evolve, so too will the expectations surrounding declassifying practices. Citizens increasingly demand access to information that affects their lives and holds their leaders accountable. By understanding the significance of declassifying, we can better appreciate the complexities involved in balancing the need for security with the fundamental right to know. Ultimately, a well-informed public is essential for a healthy democracy, and declassifying information is a key step in achieving that goal.

“解密”这个概念近年来引起了广泛关注，特别是在政府透明度和公众信息获取的背景下。“解密”是指正式取消文件或信息的机密状态，使其对公众可访问。这个过程对于促进政府与公民之间的问责制和信任至关重要。在许多民主社会中，公众对政府行动的透明度，尤其是涉及国家安全或情报行动的透明度的需求日益增加。 历史上，许多与军事行动和情报活动相关的文件因保护敏感信息而被保密。然而，随着时间的推移，背景发生变化，某些文件保持机密的理由可能会减弱。当政府选择“解密”这些文件时，它们允许学者、记者和普通公众审视过去的决策和行动，这可以导致更具信息量的公民。 一个显著的“解密”例子是与越南战争相关的文件发布。几十年来，战争的许多方面都笼罩在秘密之中，导致公众的不信任和猜测。“解密”这些文件揭示了围绕战争的复杂性和争议，为我们提供了对政府高层决策过程的宝贵洞察。这种揭露可以引发关于伦理、治理和领导者责任的重要讨论。 除了历史文件外，“解密”过程也可以适用于正在进行的调查或当前事件。例如，当有关政府机构的不当行为的指控出现时，通常会出现对透明度的推动。倡导者认为，“解密”相关信息可以帮助恢复公众信任并确保问责制。然而，这个过程可能会引发争议，因为一些官员可能会争辩说，某些信息应保持机密，以保护国家安全利益。 透明度与安全之间的平衡是微妙的。一方面，“解密”信息可以赋予公民权力，促进民主价值观；另一方面，如果敏感信息落入错误之手，也可能带来风险。这种紧张关系突显了建立明确的指南和标准以决定什么应该被“解密”以及何时“解密”的重要性。许多政府已建立审查委员会和程序，以评估“解密”文件的请求，确保这些决定是经过深思熟虑和负责任地做出的。 总之，“解密”信息的行为在促进政府机构的透明度和问责制方面发挥着至关重要的作用。随着社会的不断发展，围绕“解密”实践的期望也将不断演变。公民越来越要求获取影响他们生活的信息，并让他们的领导者承担责任。通过理解“解密”的重要性，我们可以更好地欣赏在平衡安全需求与知情权之间所涉及的复杂性。最终，受过良好教育的公众对于健康的民主制度至关重要，而“解密”信息是实现这一目标的关键步骤。