decry

简明释义

英[dɪˈkraɪ]美[dɪˈkraɪ]

vt. 责难，谴责；诽谤

第 三 人 称 单 数 d e c r i e s

现 在 分 词 d e c r y i n g

过 去 式 d e c r i e d

过 去 分 词 d e c r i e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Andrew may judge other foreigners for being tourists and decry his own "Africa-lite" experience, but a sense of possessiveness is not a part of the equation.

安德鲁(Andrew)会批评其他外国人只当游客，也会责难他自己浅薄的非洲经验，不过占有欲却不是其中的一部分。

2.Those who defend this robust interventionism and those who decry its effects are vying to shape the nation's take on the events of the past 16 months.

有人为这种强势的干预主义进行辩护，有人谴责它的成效，双方都在争相塑造美国对过去16个月中一系列事件的应对方法。

3.They would say that, other Europeans retort; they decry Britain's one-year taught masters' degrees as lightweight.

他们尽可以这么说，其他欧洲人反击道，并将英国的一年制硕士学位斥为小儿科。

4.And yet doomsayers continue to decry America's decline.

然而，预言继续谴责了美国的衰落。

5.Many people decry flogging (or caning).

许多人反对鞭打或棒打。

6.The popular view when discussing urban transportation in American cities today is to decry its sorry state.

人们议论起今天美国城市的交通，普遍都对其混乱不堪的状况持公开批评的观点。

7.Ultimately, lawyering is becoming more of a business than a profession. Some lawyers decry this.

最终，“律师”正从一种职业向商业转变，对此一些律师强烈谴责，也有人表示欢迎，很少有人不承认这一趋势。

8.Many activists have come together to decry the lack of action on climate change.

许多活动家聚集在一起谴责对气候变化缺乏行动。

9.The critics decry the film for its unrealistic portrayal of historical events.

评论家们抨击这部电影对历史事件的不现实描绘。

10.Local leaders decry the violence that has plagued their community.

地方领导人谴责困扰他们社区的暴力行为。

11.She publicly decried the unfair treatment of workers in the factory.

她公开谴责工厂对工人的不公平待遇。

12.In his speech, he decried the corruption within the government.

在他的演讲中，他谴责政府内部的腐败。

作文

In today's society, the power of social media has grown exponentially, allowing individuals to voice their opinions on various issues. However, this same platform can also be misused, leading to a phenomenon where people often decry actions or statements without fully understanding the context. To decry means to publicly criticize something or someone, often in a harsh manner. This word encapsulates the essence of how quickly judgments can be made in the digital age, sometimes overlooking the nuances that are essential for informed discourse. Take, for instance, the recent debates surrounding environmental policies. Many activists decry the lack of action from governments regarding climate change. While their concerns are valid, it is crucial to analyze the complexities behind these policies. The term decry highlights the tendency to oversimplify issues, reducing them to black-and-white arguments that fail to capture the intricacies involved. Moreover, the act of decrying can lead to a divisive atmosphere where constructive dialogue is stifled. When individuals rush to decry opposing viewpoints, they may inadvertently create an environment where compromise becomes impossible. For example, in discussions about immigration, some groups decry any form of leniency, labeling those who advocate for humane treatment as weak or misguided. This creates a polarized situation where both sides are entrenched in their positions, making it difficult to find common ground. It is essential to recognize that while decrying can serve as a catalyst for change, it can also hinder progress. Effective communication requires more than just pointing out flaws; it calls for an understanding of different perspectives and a willingness to engage in meaningful conversations. Instead of merely decrying what one perceives as wrong, individuals should strive to propose solutions and foster dialogue that encourages understanding. Furthermore, the implications of decrying extend beyond individual interactions; they shape societal norms and influence public opinion. For instance, when celebrities decry systemic injustices, their voices can mobilize large audiences and inspire movements. However, if their criticisms lack depth or are perceived as insincere, they risk alienating those they aim to support. Therefore, it is vital for public figures to approach their critiques thoughtfully, ensuring that their messages resonate with authenticity. In conclusion, while the act of decrying serves a purpose in raising awareness and advocating for change, it is imperative to approach such criticism with care. To decry is not inherently negative; it can be a powerful tool for highlighting injustices. Yet, we must remain vigilant against the pitfalls of oversimplification and polarization. By fostering a culture of understanding and respectful dialogue, we can transform the act of decrying into a constructive force that drives positive change in our society.

在当今社会，社交媒体的力量呈指数级增长，使个人能够对各种问题发表意见。然而，这一平台也可能被误用，导致人们在没有充分理解背景的情况下，常常对某些行为或言论进行decry（公开批评）。Decry意味着公开批评某事或某人，通常是以严厉的方式。这个词概括了在数字时代，人们如何迅速做出判断，有时忽视了进行知情讨论所必需的细微差别。 例如，最近围绕环境政策的辩论中，许多活动家decry政府在气候变化方面缺乏行动。虽然他们的担忧是合理的，但分析这些政策背后的复杂性至关重要。Decry这个词突显了简化问题的倾向，把它们归结为黑白分明的论点，而这些论点未能捕捉到涉及的复杂性。 此外，decrying的行为可能导致一种分裂的氛围，建设性的对话受到压制。当个人急于decry对立观点时，他们可能无意中创造了一个妨碍妥协的环境。例如，在关于移民的讨论中，一些团体decry任何形式的宽容，将倡导人道待遇的人标记为软弱或误导。这造成了一种极化的局面，使双方都固守自己的立场，难以找到共同点。 必须认识到，虽然decrying可以作为变革的催化剂，但也可能妨碍进展。有效的沟通不仅仅是指出缺陷；它需要理解不同的观点以及参与有意义对话的意愿。与其仅仅decry一个人认为错误的事情，不如努力提出解决方案，并促进鼓励理解的对话。 此外，decrying的影响超越了个人互动；它塑造社会规范并影响公众舆论。例如，当名人decry系统性不公时，他们的声音可以动员大量观众并激励运动。然而，如果他们的批评缺乏深度或被视为不真诚，他们就有可能疏远他们旨在支持的人。因此，公共人物在接近他们的批评时，确保其信息真实共鸣至关重要。 总之，虽然decrying的行为在提高意识和倡导变革方面发挥了作用，但以谨慎的态度对待这种批评至关重要。Decry并非固有负面；它可以成为突出不公正的强大工具。然而，我们必须保持警惕，防止过度简化和极化的陷阱。通过培养理解和尊重对话的文化，我们可以将decrying的行为转变为推动我们社会积极变革的建设性力量。