deductively

简明释义

英[/dɪˈdʌktɪvli/]美[/dɪˈdʌktɪvli/]

adv. 演绎地

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The only that that is important now is that you understand what a deductively valid argument is. That it is truth preserving, if the premises are true then the conclusion must be true.

现在唯一重要的是你们要理解，什么事演绎的有效论点，也就是真理保留，如果前提是真的，结论必定是真的。

2.Do you see how that is-if that's a deductively valid argument it in the virtue of the meaning of the word wrong. Isn't it?

你们明白，如果那是一个演绎有效的论点，它是通过错误这个词的意思，不是吗？

3.So the fallacy of fast talking, and the list of fallacies are down there just for you amusement Okay here's a fallacy, well deductively valid argument and here's a fallacy that looks like it.

快速谈话的谬论，谬论的清单是供你们娱乐的，这里有个谬论，演绎的有效论点，有谬论看起来像。

4.Its truth has been proven inductively, not deductively.

它的真实性是被证明归纳而成的，而不是靠推理演绎得来。

5.That's right. So if you have a valid argument a deductively valid argument in which the conclusion is false then you know one of the premises must be false.

对，所以如果论点有效，一个演绎的有效论点中结论是假的，你就知道前提中有一项是假的。

6.That's examples of deductively valid arguments.

这是演绎有效论点的例子。

7.The detective solved the case deductively, using clues to eliminate suspects one by one.

侦探通过演绎推理解决了案件，利用线索逐一排除嫌疑人。

8.In mathematics, we often prove theorems deductively from axioms.

在数学中，我们经常从公理出发进行演绎推理来证明定理。

9.The scientist approached the experiment deductively, forming a hypothesis based on existing theories.

科学家以演绎推理的方式进行实验，根据现有理论形成假设。

10.She argued deductively that if all humans are mortal and Socrates is a human, then Socrates is mortal.

她演绎推理地论证，如果所有人都是凡人，而苏格拉底是人，那么苏格拉底就是凡人。

11.The lawyer presented the evidence deductively to build a strong case against the defendant.

律师通过演绎推理呈现证据，以建立对被告的有力指控。

作文

In the realm of logic and reasoning, the ability to think deductively is a crucial skill that can significantly enhance our problem-solving capabilities. Deductively refers to a method of reasoning from the general to the specific, where conclusions are drawn based on premises that are generally accepted as true. This approach is not just limited to academic disciplines but is also applicable in everyday decision-making processes. For instance, consider a scenario where a detective is investigating a crime scene. The detective starts with a general hypothesis: 'All suspects who were present at the crime scene have a motive.' From this general premise, the detective can deductively reason about specific individuals who were present. If a particular suspect was indeed at the scene and had a known motive, the detective can conclude that this individual is likely involved in the crime. This example illustrates how deductive reasoning allows one to arrive at specific conclusions based on established general principles. Moreover, deductive reasoning is often used in mathematics and science. In mathematics, for example, if we know that all angles in a triangle sum up to 180 degrees (a general rule), we can deductively calculate the measure of an unknown angle if we know the measures of the other two angles. This logical progression from general rules to specific cases is what makes deductive reasoning a powerful tool in various fields. In contrast, inductive reasoning involves making generalizations based on specific observations. While both methods are essential, deductive reasoning is often seen as more rigorous because it relies on established facts and principles. When we argue deductively, we create a structure that supports our conclusions with solid foundations. This is particularly important in academic writing, where claims must be substantiated with evidence. Furthermore, being able to think deductively can also improve our critical thinking skills. By training ourselves to recognize patterns and relationships between general principles and specific instances, we become better equipped to analyze complex information. This skill is invaluable not only in academic settings but also in professional environments where strategic planning and decision-making are required. In conclusion, the ability to reason deductively is an essential skill that can greatly benefit individuals in various aspects of life. Whether in solving a mystery, tackling mathematical problems, or making informed decisions, deductive reasoning provides a clear pathway from general truths to specific conclusions. By honing this skill, we can enhance our analytical abilities, improve our arguments, and ultimately make better choices based on logical reasoning. As we continue to navigate through the complexities of life, embracing deductive reasoning will undoubtedly serve us well in our pursuit of knowledge and understanding.

在逻辑和推理的领域，演绎地思考的能力是一项至关重要的技能，可以显著增强我们的解决问题能力。演绎地指的是一种从一般到具体的推理方法，其中结论是基于普遍接受为真的前提得出的。这种方法不仅限于学术领域，也适用于日常决策过程。 例如，考虑一个侦探正在调查犯罪现场的场景。侦探从一个一般假设开始：'所有在犯罪现场出现的嫌疑人都有动机。'根据这个一般前提，侦探可以演绎地推理出具体的个人。如果某个特定的嫌疑人确实在现场并且有已知的动机，侦探可以得出这个人可能与犯罪有关的结论。这个例子说明了如何通过演绎推理使人能够根据既定的一般原则得出具体的结论。 此外，演绎推理通常用于数学和科学中。在数学中，例如，如果我们知道三角形的所有角度总和为180度（一个一般规则），那么如果我们知道其他两个角的度数，我们就可以演绎地计算未知角的度数。这种从一般规则到具体案例的逻辑推理使得演绎推理成为各个领域的强大工具。 相比之下，归纳推理涉及基于具体观察进行概括。虽然这两种方法都是必不可少的，但演绎推理通常被视为更严格，因为它依赖于既定事实和原则。当我们进行演绎论证时，我们创建一个支持我们结论的结构，具有坚实的基础。这在学术写作中尤为重要，因为主张必须以证据为依据。 此外，能够演绎地思考还可以提高我们的批判性思维能力。通过训练自己识别一般原则和具体实例之间的模式和关系，我们能够更好地分析复杂的信息。这一技能在学术环境中以及在需要战略规划和决策的专业环境中都是无价的。 总之，演绎地推理的能力是一项基本技能，可以极大地帮助个人在生活的各个方面。无论是在解决谜题、处理数学问题，还是做出明智的决策，演绎推理都提供了一条从一般真理到具体结论的清晰路径。通过磨练这一技能，我们可以增强我们的分析能力，改善我们的论点，并最终基于逻辑推理做出更好的选择。当我们继续在生活的复杂性中航行时，拥抱演绎推理无疑会在我们追求知识和理解的过程中为我们提供良好的帮助。