deductive

简明释义

英[dɪˈdʌktɪv]美[dɪˈdʌktɪv]

adj. 演绎的，推论的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.A good deductive argument gives us conditional certainty.

一个好的演绎论点给我们有条件的确定性。

2.That's a strong inductive argument, why isn't that a deductive argument?

这是个有力的归纳论点，为什么不是演绎论点呢？

3.Okay, deductive or inductive?

好，演绎还是归纳？

4.Okay put up your hands if you think it's deductive. Well done.

如果你认为这是演绎的请举手，好。

5.The coming of new Indian Hetuvidya realized its logical leap from inductive reasoning to deductive reasoning.

印度古因明到新因明实现了类比推理向演绎推理的飞跃；

6.Which of these are deductive? My left or right. Right.

哪些是演绎的？我的左边还是右边。

7.The coming of new Indian Hetuvidya realized its logical leap from inductive reasoning to deductive reasoning.

印度古因明到新因明实现了类比推理向演绎推理的飞跃；

8.Deductive inference and non - deductive inference are often used in mathematical proof.

演绎推理和非演绎推理经常被运用到数学证明中。

9.Right the only thing you have to remember is that the deductive argument has certainty.

你们要记住的唯一的事就是，演绎论点有确定性。

10.In a court of law, the lawyer used deductive reasoning to prove his client's innocence.

在法庭上，律师使用演绎推理来证明他客户的清白。

11.The scientist applied deductive logic to formulate a hypothesis based on existing theories.

科学家运用演绎逻辑根据现有理论制定假设。

12.In mathematics, deductive reasoning is essential for proving theorems.

在数学中，演绎推理对于证明定理至关重要。

13.Teachers often encourage deductive thinking in their students to help them solve complex problems.

教师通常鼓励学生进行演绎思维，以帮助他们解决复杂问题。

14.The detective used deductive reasoning to connect the clues and solve the case.

侦探运用演绎推理将线索联系起来，解决了案件。

作文

In the realm of logic and reasoning, the term deductive plays a crucial role. It refers to a method of reasoning from the general to the specific, where conclusions are drawn based on premises that are assumed to be true. This approach is fundamental in various fields, including mathematics, philosophy, and science. Understanding the concept of deductive reasoning can enhance our critical thinking skills and improve our ability to make sound judgments. To illustrate the principle of deductive reasoning, consider a simple example: All humans are mortal; Socrates is a human; therefore, Socrates is mortal. In this case, the first statement is a general premise, while the second statement applies that generality to a specific instance. The conclusion logically follows from the premises, demonstrating how deductive reasoning operates. The power of deductive reasoning lies in its ability to provide certainty, assuming that the premises are indeed accurate. This certainty is particularly valuable in scientific research, where hypotheses are tested through experiments. For instance, if a scientist hypothesizes that a certain chemical reaction occurs under specific conditions, they can use deductive reasoning to predict the outcome of their experiment. If the premises hold true, the conclusion will also be valid, leading to reliable results. However, it is essential to recognize the limitations of deductive reasoning. If the initial premises are flawed or incorrect, the conclusion will also be invalid. Therefore, the strength of deductive reasoning is contingent upon the truth of its premises. This highlights the importance of thorough research and validation in any argument or theory proposed. In contrast to deductive reasoning, there is another form known as inductive reasoning, which works from specific observations to broader generalizations. While deductive reasoning provides certainty when premises are true, inductive reasoning offers probabilistic conclusions based on patterns observed in specific instances. For example, if one observes that the sun has risen every day of their life, they might conclude that the sun will rise again tomorrow. This conclusion, while reasonable, is not guaranteed. Thus, both forms of reasoning have their place in logical discourse, but they serve different purposes. In everyday life, we often engage in deductive reasoning without even realizing it. When making decisions, we might rely on general rules or principles to guide our choices. For instance, if we know that all fruits contain vitamins, and we choose to eat an apple, we can deduce that we are consuming vitamins. This application of deductive reasoning helps us navigate our daily lives more effectively. Moreover, learning about deductive reasoning can enhance our argumentative skills. In writing essays or participating in debates, being able to construct logical arguments based on solid premises allows us to persuade others more effectively. When we present our ideas clearly and logically, we are more likely to gain support for our viewpoints. In conclusion, the concept of deductive reasoning is vital for logical thinking and decision-making. By understanding how it works and recognizing its strengths and limitations, we can apply it more effectively in various aspects of our lives. Whether in academic pursuits, professional endeavors, or personal decision-making, mastering deductive reasoning can lead to clearer thought processes and better outcomes. As we continue to develop our critical thinking skills, let us embrace the power of deductive reasoning and use it to enhance our understanding of the world around us.

在逻辑和推理的领域中，术语deductive（演绎的）扮演着至关重要的角色。它指的是一种从一般到具体的推理方法，其中结论是基于假定为真的前提得出的。这种方法在数学、哲学和科学等多个领域中都是基础。理解deductive（演绎的）推理的概念可以增强我们的批判性思维能力，提高我们做出合理判断的能力。 为了说明deductive（演绎的）推理的原则，可以考虑一个简单的例子：所有人都是凡人；苏格拉底是一个人；因此，苏格拉底是凡人。在这个例子中，第一个陈述是一个一般前提，而第二个陈述则将这一普遍性应用于一个具体实例。结论逻辑上从前提中得出，展示了deductive（演绎的）推理是如何运作的。 Deductive（演绎的）推理的力量在于它能够提供确定性，假设前提确实准确。这种确定性在科学研究中尤其有价值，在科学研究中，假设通过实验进行检验。例如，如果科学家假设某种化学反应在特定条件下发生，他们可以使用deductive（演绎的）推理来预测实验的结果。如果前提成立，结论也将是有效的，从而导致可靠的结果。 然而，必须认识到deductive（演绎的）推理的局限性。如果初始前提存在缺陷或错误，结论也将无效。因此，deductive（演绎的）推理的强度依赖于其前提的真实性。这突显了在任何提出的论点或理论中进行彻底研究和验证的重要性。 与deductive（演绎的）推理相对的是另一种形式，称为归纳推理，它从特定观察到更广泛的概括。虽然deductive（演绎的）推理在前提为真时提供确定性，但归纳推理则基于特定实例中观察到的模式提供概率性结论。例如，如果一个人观察到太阳在他们生活的每一天都升起，他们可能会得出结论，明天太阳也会升起。这个结论虽然合理，但并不保证。因此，这两种推理形式在逻辑讨论中各有其位置，但它们服务于不同的目的。 在日常生活中，我们常常在不自觉的情况下参与deductive（演绎的）推理。当做出决定时，我们可能会依赖一般规则或原则来指导我们的选择。例如，如果我们知道所有水果都含有维生素，而我们选择吃一个苹果，我们可以推断出我们正在摄入维生素。这种deductive（演绎的）推理的应用帮助我们更有效地驾驭日常生活。 此外，学习deductive（演绎的）推理可以增强我们的论证技能。在写论文或参加辩论时，能够根据坚实的前提构建逻辑论点使我们更有效地说服他人。当我们清晰而合逻辑地陈述我们的想法时，我们更有可能获得对我们观点的支持。 总之，deductive（演绎的）推理的概念对于逻辑思维和决策至关重要。通过理解它是如何运作的，并认识到它的优缺点，我们可以在生活的各个方面更有效地应用它。无论是在学术追求、职业努力还是个人决策中，掌握deductive（演绎的）推理都能带来更清晰的思维过程和更好的结果。随着我们继续发展我们的批判性思维能力，让我们拥抱deductive（演绎的）推理的力量，并利用它来增强我们对周围世界的理解。