defrock

简明释义

英[ˌdiːˈfrɒk]美[ˌdiːˈfrɑːk]

vt. 解除僧职；剥去法衣

第 三 人 称 单 数 d e f r o c k s

现 在 分 词 d e f r o c k i n g

过 去 式 d e f r o c k e d

过 去 分 词 d e f r o c k e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.In other words, these birds of a feather defrock together.

换句话说，这些鸟类是一次性褪光所有羽毛的。

2.In other words, these birds of a feather defrock together.

换句话说，这些鸟类是一次性褪光所有羽毛的。

3.The church decided to defrock the priest after the scandal was revealed.

教会决定在丑闻曝光后剥夺这位牧师的职务。

4.After the investigation, the bishop had no choice but to defrock the clergyman.

调查结束后，主教别无选择，只能剥夺这位神职人员的职务。

5.The decision to defrock him was met with mixed reactions from the congregation.

对他剥夺职务的决定在会众中引起了不同的反应。

6.In some cases, a priest may voluntarily choose to defrock themselves due to personal reasons.

在某些情况下，牧师可能因个人原因自愿选择剥夺自己的职务。

7.The allegations were serious enough for the church to defrock the accused.

指控的严重性足以使教会剥夺被告的职务。

作文

In the realm of religious institutions, the term defrock holds significant weight. It refers to the act of stripping a clergy member of their ecclesiastical status or privileges, often due to misconduct or failure to adhere to the moral and ethical standards expected of them. This term is not only limited to the Christian faith but can also be applicable in various religious contexts where leaders are held accountable for their actions. The process of defrocking is typically seen as a last resort, reserved for serious offenses that undermine the integrity of the institution. For instance, consider a scenario where a priest is found guilty of engaging in inappropriate behavior with minors. Such actions not only violate the trust placed in them by their congregation but also tarnish the reputation of the church. In this case, the church may decide to defrock the priest, thereby removing him from his position and responsibilities. This decision is often accompanied by public announcements to assure the community that the institution takes such matters seriously and is committed to maintaining a safe environment for all its members. The implications of defrocking extend beyond the individual being removed from their position. It serves as a warning to others within the institution about the consequences of unethical behavior. Furthermore, it reflects the organization's commitment to accountability and transparency. In many cases, the act of defrocking can lead to legal repercussions for the individual involved, depending on the severity of their actions. However, the process of defrocking is not without controversy. Some argue that it can be used as a tool for political maneuvering within religious organizations. There have been instances where clergy members are defrocked not necessarily for misconduct but as a result of power struggles or differing theological beliefs. This raises questions about the fairness and objectivity of the process. Critics point out that the lack of clear guidelines for defrocking can lead to arbitrary decisions that may not reflect the true nature of the alleged misconduct. Moreover, the emotional and psychological impact on those who are defrocked can be profound. Many individuals dedicate their lives to serving their communities and find their identities intertwined with their roles as spiritual leaders. When they are defrocked, it can lead to feelings of shame, isolation, and loss of purpose. The support systems available to these individuals post-defrocking can vary widely, and in some cases, they may struggle to reintegrate into society. In conclusion, the term defrock encompasses a complex interplay of morality, accountability, and institutional integrity within religious organizations. While it serves an important purpose in maintaining ethical standards, it also raises significant questions about the processes and motivations behind such actions. As society continues to evolve, so too will the discussions surrounding the implications of defrocking, ensuring that accountability remains at the forefront of religious leadership. In Chinese, defrock 的意思是“剥夺神职”，通常用于指责某个宗教领袖因不当行为或失职而被剥夺其神职或特权。该词在宗教机构中具有重要意义，涉及对道德与伦理标准的遵守。

在宗教机构的领域中，术语defrock具有重要的分量。它指的是剥夺一名神职人员的教会地位或特权的行为，通常是由于不当行为或未能遵守对他们的道德和伦理标准的期望。这个术语不仅限于基督教信仰，也适用于各种宗教背景下，领导者需要对自己的行为负责。defrock的过程通常被视为最后的手段，保留给那些严重侵犯了机构诚信的行为。 例如，考虑一个场景，一名牧师被发现有与未成年人发生不当行为的罪行。这种行为不仅违反了会众对他们的信任，也玷污了教会的声誉。在这种情况下，教会可能决定defrock这名牧师，从而将他从他的职位和责任中移除。这个决定通常伴随着公开声明，以确保社区相信该机构认真对待此类事务，并致力于维护所有成员的安全环境。 defrock的影响超出了个体被移除其职位的范畴。它向机构内的其他人发出警告，关于不道德行为的后果。此外，它反映了组织对问责制和透明度的承诺。在许多情况下，defrock的行为可能导致个人的法律后果，具体取决于他们行为的严重性。 然而，defrock的过程并非没有争议。一些人认为，这可以作为宗教组织内部政治操控的工具。曾经有过一些情况，神职人员并不是因为不当行为而被defrock，而是由于权力斗争或不同的神学信仰。这引发了关于这一过程的公平性和客观性的问题。批评者指出，缺乏明确的defrock指南可能导致任意的决定，这可能无法反映所指控的不当行为的真实性质。 此外，被defrock的个体在情感和心理上的影响可能是深远的。许多人将他们的生活奉献给服务社区，并发现他们的身份与作为精神领袖的角色交织在一起。当他们被defrock时，会导致羞耻、孤立和失去目标感。可供这些人在defrock后使用的支持系统差异很大，在某些情况下，他们可能会在重新融入社会中挣扎。 总之，术语defrock涵盖了宗教组织内道德、问责和机构诚信之间复杂的互动。尽管它在维护伦理标准方面发挥着重要作用，但它也引发了关于此类行为背后的过程和动机的重要问题。随着社会的不断发展，围绕defrock的讨论也将继续，使问责制始终处于宗教领导的最前沿。