deistic

简明释义

英[deɪˈɪstɪk;diːˈɪstɪk]美[deɪˈɪstɪkˌdiːˈɪstɪk]

adj. 自然神论的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The emphasis in these glad deistic days now shifted from duties to rights.

欣然信奉自然神教时代的重点已经转移，由义务转到权利。

2.The emphasis in these glad deistic days now shifted from duties to rights.

欣然信奉自然神教时代的重点已经转移，由义务转到权利。

3.Voltaire used the earthquake to attack deistic optimism.

伏尔泰用地震来攻击那些自然神论乐观主义者。

4.Many philosophers have proposed a deistic view of the universe, suggesting that a creator set it in motion but does not intervene in its workings.

许多哲学家提出了一种自然神论的宇宙观，认为一个创造者启动了宇宙，但不干预其运作。

5.His deistic beliefs led him to appreciate nature as a reflection of a higher power.

他的自然神论的信仰使他欣赏自然作为更高力量的反映。

6.The deistic perspective emphasizes reason and observation over religious dogma.

这种自然神论的观点强调理性和观察，而非宗教教条。

7.In a deistic framework, God is often seen as a distant architect of the universe.

在自然神论的框架中，上帝通常被视为宇宙的遥远建筑师。

8.Many Enlightenment thinkers were influenced by deistic principles that rejected organized religion.

许多启蒙时代的思想家受到拒绝组织宗教的自然神论的原则的影响。

作文

Throughout history, the concept of God has been interpreted in various ways, leading to the emergence of different philosophical and theological perspectives. One such perspective is known as deistic, which refers to the belief in a creator who does not intervene in the universe after its creation. This idea contrasts sharply with the more traditional views of God found in many religions, where God is seen as actively involved in the world and in the lives of individuals. The deistic viewpoint gained prominence during the Enlightenment, a period marked by an emphasis on reason, science, and individualism. Many Enlightenment thinkers, such as Thomas Jefferson and Voltaire, embraced deistic beliefs, arguing that while a divine creator may exist, the evidence of this creator's existence should be sought through nature and reason rather than through revelation or organized religion. The implications of deistic belief are profound. For one, it promotes a sense of autonomy and responsibility among individuals. If God does not intervene in human affairs, then it becomes the responsibility of individuals to govern their own lives and make moral choices based on reason and ethical principles rather than relying on divine guidance. This perspective encourages critical thinking and personal accountability, as individuals must navigate the complexities of life without the expectation of miraculous interventions. Moreover, deistic thought fosters a deep appreciation for the natural world. Since deists believe that the universe operates according to natural laws set in motion by a creator, they often find beauty and inspiration in the study of nature and science. This reverence for the natural order can lead to a greater commitment to environmental stewardship and a desire to understand the universe through scientific inquiry. However, the deistic worldview is not without its challenges. Critics argue that it can lead to a sense of detachment from the divine, as the absence of an active God may leave individuals feeling isolated in their struggles. Additionally, some contend that a purely deistic approach can undermine the foundations of morality, as it lacks the authoritative guidance provided by a personal God who offers commandments and ethical direction. Despite these criticisms, deism remains a significant philosophical stance. It invites individuals to explore the relationship between faith and reason, encouraging a dialogue between science and spirituality. In a modern context, where many people seek to reconcile their scientific understanding of the world with their spiritual beliefs, deistic thought offers a compelling framework for this exploration. In conclusion, the deistic perspective on God and the universe presents a unique approach to understanding existence. By positing a creator who does not interfere in the workings of the world, deism emphasizes human autonomy, rationality, and a profound appreciation for nature. While it may pose certain challenges, the deistic worldview encourages individuals to seek knowledge and meaning through their own experiences and understanding, fostering a rich and diverse tapestry of beliefs in the quest for truth.

在历史上，关于上帝的概念有多种解释，导致了不同哲学和神学观点的出现。其中一种观点被称为自然神论，指的是对一个创造者的信仰，该创造者在创造宇宙后不再干预。这一理念与许多宗教中对上帝的传统看法形成鲜明对比，在这些宗教中，上帝被视为积极参与世界和个人生活的存在。自然神论的观点在启蒙时代获得了显著的关注，这一时期强调理性、科学和个人主义。许多启蒙思想家，如托马斯·杰斐逊和伏尔泰，接受了自然神论的信仰，认为虽然可能存在一个神圣的创造者，但这一创造者存在的证据应通过自然和理性而非启示或组织宗教来寻找。 自然神论信仰的影响深远。首先，它促进了个体的自主性和责任感。如果上帝不干预人类事务，那么每个人就有责任管理自己的生活，并根据理性和伦理原则做出道德选择，而不是依赖于神圣的指引。这一观点鼓励批判性思维和个人责任，因为个体必须在没有奇迹干预的情况下应对生活的复杂性。 此外，自然神论思想培养了对自然界的深刻欣赏。由于自然神论者相信宇宙是根据创造者设定的自然法则运作的，他们常常在研究自然和科学中找到美和灵感。这种对自然秩序的尊重可以导致更大的环境保护承诺，以及通过科学探究理解宇宙的愿望。 然而，自然神论的世界观并非没有挑战。批评者认为，这可能导致与神的脱节，因为缺乏一个积极的上帝可能让个体在挣扎中感到孤立。此外，有人认为纯粹的自然神论方法可能削弱道德基础，因为它缺乏个人上帝提供的权威指导，该上帝提供命令和伦理方向。 尽管存在这些批评，自然神论仍然是一个重要的哲学立场。它邀请个体探索信仰与理性之间的关系，鼓励科学与精神之间的对话。在现代背景下，许多人寻求将对世界的科学理解与他们的精神信仰相结合，自然神论思想为这种探索提供了一个引人注目的框架。 总之，自然神论对上帝和宇宙的观点提供了一种独特的理解存在的方法。通过假设一个不干预世界运作的创造者，自然神论强调人类的自主性、理性和对自然的深刻欣赏。尽管它可能带来某些挑战，自然神论的世界观鼓励个体通过自己的经验和理解寻求知识和意义，促进了对真理追求的丰富多样的信仰画卷。