delict

简明释义

英[dɪˈlɪkt]美[dɪˈlɪkt]

n. 侵权行为；轻罪；不法行为

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Part 4: in this part, the article puts forward suggestion for legislation, deems that we can form a system of punishing delict in substantive law and realize procedure justice in proceeding.

第四部分，提出了劳动教养制度的实体法与程序法的立法建议，认为实体上应当确立轻罪处罚制度，程序上应当注重实现程序正义。

2.Part 4: in this part, the article puts forward suggestion for legislation, deems that we can form a system of punishing delict in substantive law and realize procedure justice in proceeding.

第四部分，提出了劳动教养制度的实体法与程序法的立法建议，认为实体上应当确立轻罪处罚制度，程序上应当注重实现程序正义。

3.Objective To discuss the interrelated factor associated with delict of the aged and Mental disorder.

目的探讨老年人犯罪与精神障碍的相关因素；

4.In Chinese arbitral law field, there are disputes over whether or not delict can be arbitrated.

能否对侵权行为给以仲裁，在我国仲裁法律界存在争议。

5.The term delict and variants thereof are used in civil law systems for civil wrongs.

不法侵害及其变化的术语在民法制度中被用于民事侵权行为上。

6.In civil law, a delict is an act that causes harm to another person, leading to liability.

在民法中，delict 是一种对他人造成伤害的行为，导致责任。

7.The court ruled that the defendant committed a delict by causing damage to the plaintiff's property.

法院裁定被告通过对原告财产造成损害而犯下了一个delict。

8.Understanding the concept of delict is crucial for law students.

理解delict 的概念对法学生来说至关重要。

9.A delict can be intentional or unintentional, depending on the circumstances.

根据情况，delict 可以是故意或无意的。

10.In some jurisdictions, a delict may also refer to a wrongful act that is not a crime.

在某些法域中，delict 也可以指不是犯罪的错误行为。

作文

In the study of law, understanding the concept of a delict is essential for anyone pursuing a career in legal practice. A delict, which can be defined as a wrongful act or an infringement of a right leading to legal liability, plays a crucial role in the field of tort law. Unlike criminal offenses, which are prosecuted by the state, a delict is typically a civil matter where the injured party seeks compensation from the wrongdoer. This distinction highlights the importance of understanding the nuances between different types of legal wrongs. For instance, consider a scenario where a person suffers injuries due to another's negligence. If the injured party can prove that the other person had a duty of care and breached that duty, resulting in harm, they may have a valid claim based on delict. The legal principles surrounding delict often require thorough examination of the facts and circumstances of each case. Factors such as intent, foreseeability, and the nature of the harm all play significant roles in determining whether a delict has occurred. Moreover, the concept of delict extends beyond just physical harm. It encompasses a wide range of wrongful acts, including defamation, trespass, and emotional distress. Each of these categories presents unique challenges in proving the elements of a delict. For example, in a defamation case, the plaintiff must establish that false statements were made about them, which caused reputational damage. This complexity requires legal practitioners to possess a deep understanding of both the law and the factual context surrounding each case. The implications of delict are far-reaching, influencing not only individual cases but also broader societal norms regarding accountability and justice. By holding individuals accountable for their wrongful acts, the legal system aims to deter future misconduct and promote a sense of responsibility among citizens. This principle is foundational in maintaining social order and ensuring that victims have a means of recourse when harmed by others. In conclusion, the term delict represents a fundamental aspect of civil law that addresses wrongful acts leading to legal liability. Its significance in the legal landscape cannot be overstated, as it shapes the interactions between individuals and the legal system. As future legal professionals delve into the intricacies of delict, they will be better equipped to advocate for justice and uphold the rights of those who have been wronged. Understanding delict not only enhances one’s legal knowledge but also fosters a deeper appreciation for the rule of law and its role in society.

在法律研究中，理解delict的概念对任何追求法律职业的人来说都是至关重要的。delict可以定义为一种错误行为或对权利的侵犯，导致法律责任，这在侵权法领域中发挥着关键作用。与由国家起诉的刑事犯罪不同，delict通常是民事事务，受害方寻求对违法者的赔偿。这一区别突显了理解不同类型法律错误之间细微差别的重要性。 例如，考虑一个场景，一个人因他人的过失而受伤。如果受害方能够证明对方有照顾义务并违反了该义务，从而导致伤害，他们可能会基于delict提出有效的索赔。围绕delict的法律原则往往需要对每个案件的事实和情况进行深入审查。意图、可预见性和伤害的性质等因素在确定是否发生delict时都发挥着重要作用。 此外，delict的概念不仅仅局限于身体伤害。它涵盖了一系列错误行为，包括诽谤、侵入和情感痛苦。每个类别在证明delict的要素时都面临独特的挑战。例如，在诽谤案件中，原告必须证明对他们的不实陈述造成了声誉损害。这种复杂性要求法律从业者对法律和每个案件的事实背景有深刻的理解。 delict的影响深远，不仅影响个案，还影响更广泛的社会规范，涉及问责制和正义。通过追究个人对其错误行为的责任，法律系统旨在阻止未来的不当行为，并促进公民之间的责任感。这一原则在维护社会秩序和确保受害者在遭受他人伤害时有补救手段方面是基础性的。 总之，术语delict代表了民法的一个基本方面，涉及导致法律责任的错误行为。它在法律领域的重要性不容低估，因为它塑造了个人与法律系统之间的互动。当未来的法律专业人士深入探讨delict的复杂性时，他们将更好地装备自己，为正义辩护，维护被侵害者的权利。理解delict不仅增强了法律知识，还培养了对法治及其在社会中角色的更深层次的欣赏。