demagogical

简明释义

英[ˌdɛm.əˈɡɒ.ɡɪ.kəl]美[ˌdɛm.əˈɡɑː.ɡɪ.kəl]

adj. 煽动的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The politician's speech was filled with demagogical tactics, appealing to emotions rather than reason.

这位政治家的演讲充满了煽动性的手法，诉诸于情感而非理性。

2.Many demagogical leaders rise to power by exploiting public fears and prejudices.

许多煽动性的领导者通过利用公众的恐惧和偏见上台。

3.His demagogical rhetoric aimed to divide the community for his own gain.

他的煽动性言辞旨在为了自己的利益而分裂社区。

4.The debate quickly turned demagogical, with candidates attacking each other's character instead of discussing policies.

辩论迅速变得煽动性，候选人们攻击对方的品格，而不是讨论政策。

5.Critics argue that the media often promotes demagogical narratives that sensationalize issues.

批评者认为媒体常常传播煽动性的叙事，夸大问题。

作文

In today's political landscape, the term demagogical refers to tactics employed by leaders who manipulate public emotions and prejudices to gain power, often at the expense of rational discourse. This approach is particularly prevalent during election seasons when candidates strive to connect with voters on an emotional level rather than through logical arguments. A classic example of a demagogical strategy is the use of fear-mongering. Politicians may exaggerate threats to national security or economic stability to rally support for their agendas. By appealing to the fears of the populace, they can divert attention from more pressing issues that require thoughtful consideration. Moreover, demagogical rhetoric often involves simplification of complex issues. Instead of presenting nuanced solutions to problems like healthcare or climate change, demagogues may offer overly simplistic answers that resonate with the public's desire for quick fixes. This oversimplification not only undermines the complexity of these issues but also fosters a culture of ignorance where critical thinking is discouraged. The consequences of demagogical leadership can be profound. When leaders prioritize emotional appeal over factual accuracy, they risk polarizing society. The public becomes divided into 'us versus them' mentalities, making it increasingly difficult to engage in constructive dialogue. This division can lead to unrest, as seen in various protests and movements around the world that are fueled by demagogical leaders who exploit societal tensions for their gain. Furthermore, the rise of social media has amplified demagogical tactics. Platforms like Twitter and Facebook allow for rapid dissemination of misleading information, often without proper context. In this environment, sensationalism thrives, and individuals are more likely to share content that evokes strong emotional reactions, regardless of its truthfulness. This creates echo chambers where demagogical messages can flourish unchecked, further entrenching divisive views within communities. To combat the influence of demagogical leaders, it is essential for citizens to cultivate critical thinking skills and seek out reliable sources of information. Education plays a crucial role in this process. By encouraging students to analyze arguments critically and understand the importance of evidence-based reasoning, society can build resilience against demagogical manipulation. Additionally, fostering open discussions that allow for diverse perspectives can help bridge divides and promote understanding among differing viewpoints. In conclusion, the demagogical tactics employed by some leaders pose significant challenges to democratic societies. By recognizing and resisting these strategies, individuals can contribute to a healthier political discourse that prioritizes reasoned debate over emotional manipulation. It is vital for the future of democracy that we remain vigilant against the allure of demagogical rhetoric and strive for a political environment grounded in facts and mutual respect.

在当今的政治格局中，术语demagogical指的是领导者利用公众情感和偏见来获得权力的策略，往往以理性讨论为代价。这种方法在选举季节尤为普遍，候选人努力与选民在情感层面上建立联系，而不是通过逻辑论证。demagogical策略的一个经典例子是利用恐惧来煽动情绪。政治家可能会夸大国家安全或经济稳定的威胁，以争取对其议程的支持。通过迎合公众的恐惧，他们可以转移对需要深思熟虑的更紧迫问题的关注。 此外，demagogical言辞通常涉及对复杂问题的简化。政客们可能不会提出对医疗保健或气候变化等问题的细致解决方案，而是提供过于简单的答案，以引起公众对快速解决方案的渴望。这种简化不仅削弱了这些问题的复杂性，还助长了一种无知文化，在这种文化中，批判性思维受到抑制。 demagogical领导的后果可能是深远的。当领导者将情感诉求置于事实准确性之上时，他们冒着极化社会的风险。公众变成了“我们对他们”的心态，使得进行建设性对话变得越来越困难。这种分裂可能导致社会动荡，正如世界各地各种抗议和运动所示，这些运动受到利用社会紧张局势以谋取利益的demagogical领导者的推动。 此外，社交媒体的兴起放大了demagogical策略。像Twitter和Facebook这样的平台允许快速传播误导性信息，通常没有适当的背景。在这种环境中，耸人听闻的内容蓬勃发展，个人更可能分享那些引发强烈情感反应的内容，而不管其真实性。这创造了回音室，让demagogical信息在没有审查的情况下蓬勃发展，进一步巩固了社区内的分歧观点。 为了抵制demagogical领导者的影响，公民培养批判性思维能力并寻找可靠的信息来源至关重要。教育在这一过程中发挥着关键作用。通过鼓励学生批判性地分析论点并理解基于证据的推理的重要性，社会可以增强抵御demagogical操控的韧性。此外，促进开放讨论，允许多元视角，可以帮助弥合分歧，促进不同观点之间的理解。 总之，一些领导者采取的demagogical策略对民主社会构成了重大挑战。通过识别和抵制这些策略，个人可以为更健康的政治话语作出贡献，优先考虑理性辩论而非情感操控。我们必须保持警惕，抵制demagogical言辞的诱惑，并努力营造一个以事实和相互尊重为基础的政治环境。