demilitarising

简明释义

英[ˌdɛmɪˈlɪtəraɪzɪŋ]美[ˌdɛmɪˈlɪtəraɪzɪŋ]

vt. 解除对……的军事管制

第 三 人 称 单 数 d e m i l i t a r i s e s

现 在 分 词 d e m i l i t a r i s i n g

过 去 式 d e m i l i t a r i s e d

过 去 分 词 d e m i l i t a r i s e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The government is focused on demilitarising 非军事化 the border region to promote peace.

政府专注于非军事化边境地区以促进和平。

2.International organizations are advocating for demilitarising 非军事化 conflict zones to reduce violence.

国际组织提倡在冲突地区进行非军事化以减少暴力。

3.The treaty aims at demilitarising 非军事化 certain areas to ensure civilian safety.

该条约旨在对某些地区进行非军事化以确保平民安全。

4.Efforts towards demilitarising 非军事化 the region have been met with mixed reactions from local communities.

对该地区进行非军事化的努力在当地社区中反应不一。

5.The peace negotiations included a clause for demilitarising 非军事化 military bases.

和平谈判中包括了一项关于非军事化军事基地的条款。

作文

In recent years, the concept of demilitarising (非军事化) has gained significant attention in international relations and peace studies. This term refers to the process of reducing or eliminating military presence, capabilities, and infrastructure in a particular region or country. The motivations behind demilitarising can vary widely, ranging from the desire for peaceful coexistence to economic considerations and the promotion of human rights. As nations grapple with the consequences of militarization, it becomes crucial to explore the implications of demilitarising on global stability and security. One of the most compelling arguments for demilitarising is the potential for fostering peace. Countries engaged in arms races often find themselves in a perpetual state of tension, where the threat of conflict looms large. By demilitarising, nations can signal their commitment to resolving disputes through dialogue rather than military action. For instance, the historic agreements between various nations to reduce nuclear arsenals are a testament to how demilitarising efforts can lead to a more stable global environment. Moreover, demilitarising can have profound economic benefits. Military expenditures consume vast amounts of national budgets, diverting funds away from critical areas such as education, healthcare, and infrastructure development. By choosing to demilitarise, countries can reallocate these resources towards improving the quality of life for their citizens. A notable example is the post-war reconstruction of Europe, where many nations chose to invest in social programs and economic development instead of military expansion. However, the process of demilitarising is not without its challenges. It often requires a significant shift in political will and public perception. In regions plagued by conflict, the idea of reducing military presence may be met with skepticism. Citizens might fear that demilitarising could leave them vulnerable to external threats or internal strife. Therefore, it is essential for governments to engage in transparent communication and build trust with their populations when considering such significant changes. Furthermore, the international community plays a vital role in supporting demilitarising efforts. Multilateral agreements and treaties can provide frameworks for countries to commit to reducing their military capabilities. Organizations like the United Nations have been instrumental in promoting disarmament initiatives, emphasizing the importance of cooperation among nations to achieve lasting peace. Through diplomatic channels, nations can share best practices and learn from each other’s experiences with demilitarising. In conclusion, demilitarising (非军事化) is a multifaceted concept that holds the potential to reshape international relations positively. While the path to demilitarising may be fraught with obstacles, the benefits of fostering peace, reallocating resources, and building trust among nations far outweigh the challenges. As we move forward in an increasingly interconnected world, embracing the principles of demilitarising could pave the way for a more secure and prosperous future for all.

近年来，非军事化（demilitarising）这一概念在国际关系和和平研究中引起了广泛关注。这个术语指的是在特定地区或国家减少或消除军事存在、能力和基础设施的过程。非军事化的动机可以有很大差异，从追求和平共处到经济考虑和促进人权等各个方面。随着各国应对军事化带来的后果，探讨非军事化对全球稳定和安全的影响变得至关重要。 支持非军事化的一个最令人信服的论点是促进和平的潜力。参与军备竞赛的国家通常会发现自己处于一种持续紧张的状态，冲突的威胁始终存在。通过非军事化，各国可以表明其通过对话而非军事行动解决争端的承诺。例如，各国之间减少核武器的历史协议证明了非军事化努力如何导致更稳定的全球环境。 此外，非军事化还可能带来深远的经济利益。军事开支消耗了国家预算的巨额资金，转移了对教育、医疗和基础设施发展的重要领域的投入。选择非军事化的国家可以将这些资源重新分配，用于改善公民的生活质量。一个显著的例子是战后重建的欧洲，许多国家选择投资社会项目和经济发展，而不是军事扩张。 然而，非军事化的过程并非没有挑战。这通常需要在政治意愿和公众认知上进行重大转变。在冲突频发的地区，减少军事存在的想法可能会遭到怀疑。公民可能担心非军事化会使他们面临外部威胁或内部冲突的脆弱。因此，当政府考虑如此重大变化时，与公众进行透明沟通并建立信任至关重要。 此外，国际社会在支持非军事化努力中发挥着至关重要的作用。多边协议和条约可以为国家承诺减少军事能力提供框架。联合国等组织在促进裁军倡议方面发挥了重要作用，强调各国合作实现持久和平的重要性。通过外交渠道，各国可以分享最佳实践，互相学习在非军事化方面的经验。 总之，非军事化（demilitarising）是一个多方面的概念，具有积极重塑国际关系的潜力。尽管非军事化的道路充满障碍，但促进和平、重新分配资源和在国家之间建立信任的好处远超过挑战。随着我们在日益互联的世界中前进，接受非军事化的原则可能为所有人铺平通往更安全、更繁荣未来的道路。