demolish

简明释义

英[dɪˈmɒlɪʃ]美[dɪˈmɑːlɪʃ]

vt. 拆毁，拆除（建筑物）；（意外）毁坏，破坏；推翻，驳倒（观点或理论）；<非正式>轻易击败，完胜；<非正式>狼吞虎咽地吃，很快吃光；伤害（感情），破坏（计划）

第 三 人 称 单 数 d e m o l i s h e s

现 在 分 词 d e m o l i s h i n g

过 去 式 d e m o l i s h e d

过 去 分 词 d e m o l i s h e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Mr Chavez had called on his followers to "demolish" the opposition.

查韦斯一直呼吁支持者“废除”反对派。

2.Freeways are a dangerous place as well, perhaps we should demolish them.

高速公路是一个危险的地方，也许我们应该拆除他。

3.Penalties could include big fines or an order to demolish the plants.

惩罚条款可能包括大额罚款或者勒令拆除工厂。

4.They are going to demolish that old factory.

他们准备拆毁那家旧工厂。

5.We are going to demolish the old building.

我们准备爆破这座旧大楼。

6.It seemed to work, but may also demolish Germans' long-term trust in the single currency.

这个方案似乎有效，但同时它打击了德国对于单一货币的长期信任。

7.Philosophers aren't convinced that brain scans can demolish free will so easily.

哲学家们并不认可脑扫描能够如此轻易地摧毁自由意志。

8.The old building was scheduled to demolish 拆除 next month to make way for a new park.

这座老建筑定于下个月被拆除，以便为一个新公园腾出空间。

9.The city council voted to demolish 拆除 the abandoned factory that had become a safety hazard.

市议会投票决定拆除那座已成为安全隐患的废弃工厂。

10.They plan to demolish 拆除 the old bridge and replace it with a modern structure.

他们计划拆除旧桥并用现代结构替换它。

11.After the earthquake, many buildings were demolish 拆除 for safety reasons.

地震后，许多建筑因安全原因被拆除。

12.The team was hired to demolish 拆除 the old stadium to prepare for the new construction.

这个团队被雇用来拆除旧体育场，以准备新的建设。

作文

The concept of progress often involves the idea of change, and sometimes that change requires us to demolish what exists in order to make way for something new. In many cities around the world, we can see this process in action. Old buildings that once served a purpose may become obsolete or unsafe, necessitating their removal. This act of demolishing structures is not merely about destruction; it is about transformation and renewal. For instance, in urban areas, old factories that have long ceased operations may be demolished to create space for modern housing or commercial developments. This shift reflects a society's evolving needs and priorities. However, the decision to demolish a building is not always straightforward. It often involves considerable debate and discussion among community members, architects, and local governments. Many people feel a strong attachment to historical buildings, viewing them as vital pieces of their cultural heritage. The demolition of such structures can lead to protests and calls for preservation. Therefore, before any demolishing takes place, it is crucial to assess the significance of the building and consider whether it can be repurposed instead. In some cases, innovative solutions allow us to retain the essence of a building while making necessary updates. For example, rather than completely demolishing an old schoolhouse, a community might choose to renovate it, keeping its historical facade while upgrading the interior to meet modern standards. This approach not only saves resources but also honors the past. By finding ways to adapt rather than demolish, we can maintain a connection to history while embracing the future. On the other hand, there are situations where demolition is unavoidable. Natural disasters, such as earthquakes or hurricanes, can render buildings unsafe. In these instances, the decision to demolish is often made quickly to protect public safety. After a disaster, communities may face the difficult task of deciding which structures to rebuild and which to demolish. This process can be emotionally charged, as people grapple with loss and the desire to move forward. Ultimately, the act of demolishing brings to light profound questions about our values and priorities as a society. What do we choose to preserve, and what do we let go? How do we balance the need for progress with respect for history? In navigating these challenges, it is essential to engage in open dialogues that involve all stakeholders. By doing so, we can ensure that the decisions made about demolition reflect a collective vision for the future. In conclusion, the word demolish embodies a complex interplay of destruction and creation. While it signifies the end of one chapter, it also heralds the beginning of another. As we continue to build and grow as communities, we must remain mindful of the implications of demolition and strive to honor the past while forging ahead into the future. The choices we make today will shape the landscapes of tomorrow, reminding us that every demolition carries with it the potential for renewal and rebirth.

进步的概念通常涉及变化的想法，有时这种变化需要我们拆除现有的东西，以便为新的事物腾出空间。在世界各地的许多城市中，我们可以看到这一过程在进行中。曾经发挥作用的旧建筑可能变得过时或不安全，因此需要将其拆除。这种拆除结构的行为不仅仅是关于破坏；它是关于转型和更新。例如，在城市地区，早已停止运营的旧工厂可能会被拆除，以为现代住宅或商业开发创造空间。这一转变反映了社会不断发展的需求和优先事项。 然而，决定拆除一座建筑并不总是简单的。这往往涉及社区成员、建筑师和地方政府之间的相当大辩论和讨论。许多人对历史建筑感到强烈依恋，认为它们是文化遗产的重要组成部分。因此，拆除此类结构可能会导致抗议和保护的呼声。因此，在进行任何拆除之前，评估建筑的重要性并考虑是否可以改造是至关重要的。 在某些情况下，创新的解决方案使我们能够保留建筑的本质，同时进行必要的更新。例如，社区可能选择翻新一座旧学校，而不是完全拆除它，保留其历史外观，同时升级内部以符合现代标准。这种方法不仅节省了资源，还尊重了过去。通过寻找适应而不是拆除的方法，我们可以保持与历史的联系，同时拥抱未来。 另一方面，有些情况下，拆除是不可避免的。自然灾害，如地震或飓风，可能会使建筑物变得不安全。在这些情况下，决定拆除往往是为了保护公众安全而迅速做出的。在灾后，社区可能面临艰难的任务，决定重建哪些结构以及拆除哪些结构。这个过程可能充满情感，因为人们努力应对损失和向前迈进的愿望。 最终，拆除的行为揭示了我们作为社会的价值观和优先事项的深刻问题。我们选择保留什么，而放弃什么？我们如何平衡对进步的需求与对历史的尊重？在应对这些挑战时，进行开放的对话，涉及所有利益相关者是至关重要的。通过这样做，我们可以确保有关拆除的决策反映出对未来的共同愿景。 总之，单词拆除体现了破坏与创造之间复杂的相互作用。虽然它象征着一个篇章的结束，但它也预示着另一个篇章的开始。当我们继续作为社区建设和发展时，我们必须时刻关注拆除的影响，并努力在向未来迈进的同时尊重过去。我们今天所做的选择将塑造明天的景观，提醒我们每一次拆除都蕴含着更新和重生的潜力。