desensitize

简明释义

英[diːˈsensətaɪz]美[diːˈsensətaɪz]

vt. 使不敏感；使麻木不仁

第 三 人 称 单 数 d e s e n s i t i z e s

现 在 分 词 d e s e n s i t i z i n g

过 去 式 d e s e n s i t i z e d

过 去 分 词 d e s e n s i t i z e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.People who suffer from allergies can sometimes be given injections to help desensitize them.

患过敏反应的人有时可用注射针剂以帮助脱敏。

2.People who suffer from allergies can sometimes be given injections to help desensitize them.

患过敏反应的人有时可用注射针剂以帮助脱敏。

3.Fear can be irrational, and in this case the approach should be to desensitize oneself.

恐惧可以是毫无理性的，而且在这种情况下，采用的方法应该是降低自己的敏感性。

4.It accustoms a horse to being handled and helps to desensitize ticklish areas.

刷马使马习惯于被控制并帮助马在一些他怕痒的地方脱敏。

5.Does sniffing too many scents desensitize your nose?

闻太多的香味你的鼻子会麻木？

6.Repeated exposure to violence on television can desensitize young viewers, making them less sensitive to real-life violence.

频繁接触电视上的暴力可能会使年轻观众对现实生活中的暴力变得更不敏感，造成脱敏。

7.Therapists often use gradual exposure techniques to desensitize patients to their phobias.

治疗师常常使用逐步暴露技术来使患者对他们的恐惧症脱敏。

8.Some medications can desensitize nerve endings, reducing the sensation of pain.

一些药物可以使神经末梢脱敏，从而减少疼痛感。

9.Over time, people can become desensitized to the emotional impact of news reports about disasters.

随着时间的推移，人们可能会对有关灾难的新闻报道的情感影响变得脱敏。

10.Exposure therapy aims to desensitize individuals to their triggers by gradually introducing them.

暴露疗法旨在通过逐渐引入触发因素来使个体脱敏。

作文

In today's fast-paced world, we are constantly bombarded with stimuli from various sources, including television, the internet, and social media. This constant exposure can lead to a phenomenon known as desensitize, which refers to the process of becoming less sensitive to emotional or physical stimuli. As we consume more content, particularly violent or distressing material, we may find ourselves becoming numb to the emotions that such events once evoked in us. This raises an important question: is this desensitize effect beneficial or detrimental to our society? On one hand, some argue that a certain level of desensitize can be advantageous. For example, individuals working in high-stress environments, such as emergency responders or healthcare professionals, often need to maintain a level of emotional detachment to perform their duties effectively. If they were overly sensitive to every situation they encountered, it could hinder their ability to make quick decisions and provide necessary care. In this sense, desensitize can serve as a coping mechanism that allows people to function in challenging circumstances. However, the negative implications of desensitize cannot be overlooked. When society becomes desensitized to violence, suffering, and injustice, it can lead to apathy and inaction. For instance, studies have shown that repeated exposure to violent media can result in a diminished emotional response to real-life violence. This can perpetuate a cycle where individuals become less likely to intervene in situations of distress or to advocate for change. The troubling reality is that as we become more accustomed to seeing violence on our screens, we may also become more accepting of it in our everyday lives. Furthermore, desensitize can affect our relationships and empathy towards others. When we are exposed to constant negativity or distressing news, we may start to feel overwhelmed, leading to emotional exhaustion. This emotional fatigue can cause us to withdraw from social interactions and diminish our capacity for empathy. We might find it easier to scroll past a news story about a tragedy rather than engage with the emotional weight of that event. As a result, the fabric of our communities may weaken as individuals become more isolated and less connected to each other. To combat the negative effects of desensitize, it is crucial to cultivate awareness and mindfulness in our consumption of media. We should strive to balance our exposure to distressing content with uplifting stories and positive experiences. Engaging in discussions about the impact of media on our emotions can also help us recognize when we are becoming desensitized and encourage us to re-evaluate our responses to various stimuli. Additionally, fostering empathy through community involvement and volunteer work can counteract the feelings of apathy that often accompany desensitize. In conclusion, while there are instances where desensitize may serve a purpose, it is essential to remain vigilant about its broader implications. By being mindful of our media consumption and actively seeking to connect with others, we can mitigate the risks associated with becoming desensitized. Ultimately, maintaining our sensitivity to the world around us is vital for nurturing compassion, fostering community, and driving positive change in society.

在当今快节奏的世界中，我们不断受到来自电视、互联网和社交媒体等各种来源的刺激。这种持续的暴露会导致一种现象，称为脱敏，指的是对情感或身体刺激变得不那么敏感的过程。随着我们消费越来越多的内容，特别是暴力或令人痛苦的材料，我们可能会发现自己对这些事件曾经引发的情感变得麻木。这提出了一个重要的问题：这种脱敏效应是有益的还是有害的？ 一方面，有人认为一定程度的脱敏可以是有利的。例如，在高压环境中工作的人，如急救人员或医疗专业人员，往往需要保持一定程度的情感距离，以有效地履行其职责。如果他们对每一个遇到的情况过于敏感，可能会妨碍他们快速决策和提供必要护理的能力。从这个意义上说，脱敏可以作为一种应对机制，使人们能够在具有挑战性的情况下运作。 然而，脱敏的负面影响不可忽视。当社会对暴力、痛苦和不公正变得麻木时，可能会导致冷漠和无动于衷。例如，研究表明，重复接触暴力媒体可能导致对现实生活中暴力的情感反应减弱。这可能会造成一个循环，使人们更不可能在困境中干预或倡导改变。令人担忧的现实是，随着我们对屏幕上暴力的适应，我们可能也会对日常生活中的暴力变得更加接受。 此外，脱敏还可能影响我们与他人的关系和同理心。当我们不断接触消极或令人痛苦的新闻时，可能会感到不堪重负，导致情感疲惫。这种情感疲惫可能使我们从社交互动中撤回，并减少我们对他人的同情能力。我们可能会发现，轻松地滚动过去一则关于悲剧的新闻故事，而不是与该事件的情感重量进行互动。因此，随着个体变得更加孤立和与他人联系减少，我们社区的结构可能会削弱。 为了对抗脱敏的负面影响，培养对媒体消费的意识和正念至关重要。我们应该努力平衡对令人痛苦内容的接触与振奋人心的故事和积极经历之间的关系。参与有关媒体对我们情感影响的讨论也可以帮助我们认识到何时我们变得脱敏并鼓励我们重新评估对各种刺激的反应。此外，通过社区参与和志愿工作来培养同理心，可以抵消通常伴随脱敏而来的冷漠感。 总之，虽然在某些情况下，脱敏可能会发挥作用，但保持警惕以应对其更广泛的影响至关重要。通过关注我们的媒体消费并积极寻求与他人联系，我们可以减轻与脱敏相关的风险。最终，保持对周围世界的敏感性对于培养同情心、促进社区和推动社会积极变化至关重要。