detaining

简明释义

英[dɪˈteɪn]美[dɪˈteɪn]

v. 拘留，扣押；耽搁，阻留

第 三 人 称 单 数 d e t a i n s

现 在 分 词 d e t a i n i n g

过 去 式 d e t a i n e d

过 去 分 词 d e t a i n e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Never. But they insisted onarresting and detaining people in this program.

一书中写道，“中情局在囚犯关押方面从来都没有任何经验，但是他们却坚决要在这项计划中逮捕扣押犯人。

2.Objective: to probe into the effect of applying detaining trocar in axillary vein for transfusion of burn infants.

前言：[目的]探讨腋静脉留置套管针在婴幼儿烧伤输液中的临床应用效果。

3.The first part tells about what'sthe precise meaning of the pretrial detaining.

第一部分，审前羁押体制的限定及其研究意义。

4.If interrogation is the point of detaining prisoners indefinitely, then physical coercion, humiliation and torture become inevitable.

假如问是限期关押囚犯的主要原因，那么身体侵犯、侮辱和酷刑折磨就不可避免。

5.The United States has defended its policy of detaining juveniles in prisons in Iraq, and Afghanistan.

美国为在伊拉克和阿富汗境内关押青少年的政策辩护。

6.The third part refers the necessity of the pretrial detaining innovation.

第三部分，我国审前羁押体制改革的必要性。

7.The police were accused of detaining suspects without sufficient evidence.

警方被指控在没有充分证据的情况下拘留嫌疑人。

8.The immigration office has the authority to detain individuals suspected of illegal entry.

移民办公室有权拘留涉嫌非法入境的个人。

9.After the incident, the security team started detaining witnesses for questioning.

事件发生后，保安团队开始拘留证人进行询问。

10.The school principal discussed the policy on detaining students after class.

校长讨论了关于课后拘留学生的政策。

11.Customs officials are responsible for detaining goods that violate regulations.

海关官员负责扣押违反规定的货物。

作文

In recent years, the issue of immigration has become a hot topic in many countries around the world. Governments are faced with the challenge of managing their borders while ensuring the safety and security of their citizens. One of the methods that has been widely discussed is the practice of detaining individuals who are suspected of entering a country illegally. This practice raises numerous ethical and legal questions that are worth exploring. The act of detaining someone typically involves holding them in custody for a certain period of time, often without formal charges being filed against them. In the context of immigration, this can mean that individuals who have crossed borders without proper documentation may find themselves in detention centers while their cases are being reviewed. While some argue that detaining these individuals is necessary to maintain law and order, others contend that it violates basic human rights. One of the primary arguments in favor of detaining individuals is the need to ensure national security. Proponents believe that by holding suspected illegal immigrants, authorities can prevent potential threats from entering the country. However, critics argue that this approach often leads to the unjust treatment of innocent people who are simply seeking a better life. Many of these individuals are fleeing violence, persecution, or economic hardship in their home countries, and detaining them only adds to their suffering. Moreover, the conditions in which these individuals are held can be quite dire. Reports have surfaced detailing overcrowded facilities, lack of access to medical care, and inadequate legal representation for those who are detaining. These conditions raise serious concerns about the morality of such practices and whether they truly serve the interests of justice. It is essential to consider whether the benefits of detaining individuals outweigh the potential harm it causes to both the individuals involved and society as a whole. Another significant aspect of this issue is the legal framework surrounding detaining individuals. In many countries, laws governing immigration and detention are complex and often subject to interpretation. This can lead to inconsistencies in how individuals are treated based on their nationality, race, or socioeconomic status. The lack of clear guidelines can result in arbitrary detaining, where individuals are held without just cause or due process. This undermines the rule of law and erodes public trust in the legal system. In conclusion, the practice of detaining individuals suspected of illegal immigration is a contentious issue that requires careful consideration. While there may be legitimate reasons for detaining individuals in certain circumstances, it is crucial to balance the need for security with the protection of human rights. Policymakers must strive to create a fair and just immigration system that respects the dignity of all individuals, regardless of their immigration status. Only then can we hope to address the complex challenges posed by immigration in a humane and effective manner.

近年来，移民问题已成为全球许多国家的热门话题。各国政府面临着管理边界的挑战，同时确保公民的安全与保障。其中一种被广泛讨论的方法是对涉嫌非法入境的个人进行拘留。这一做法引发了许多值得探讨的伦理和法律问题。 拘留某人通常涉及在一定时间内将其拘留，往往没有正式指控。在移民的背景下，这可能意味着那些没有适当文件跨越国界的人可能会在他们的案件审查期间被关押在拘留中心。尽管一些人认为拘留这些个人是维护法律和秩序所必需的，但另一些人则认为这违反了基本人权。 支持拘留个人的主要论点之一是确保国家安全的需要。支持者认为，通过拘留涉嫌非法移民，当局可以防止潜在威胁进入国家。然而，批评者认为，这种做法往往导致无辜者的不公正待遇，他们只是寻求更好的生活。这些个人中的许多人正在逃离本国的暴力、迫害或经济困境，而拘留他们只会加剧他们的痛苦。 此外，这些个人被拘留的条件可能相当恶劣。有报告详细描述了设施过度拥挤、缺乏医疗护理以及缺乏法律代表的问题。这些条件引发了对这种做法道德性的严重担忧，以及它是否真正符合正义的利益。考虑到拘留个人所带来的潜在伤害是否超过其益处至关重要，无论是对涉事个人还是对整个社会。 这一问题的另一个重要方面是围绕拘留个人的法律框架。在许多国家，关于移民和拘留的法律复杂且常常受到解释。这可能导致基于国籍、种族或社会经济地位的个人待遇不一致。缺乏明确的指导方针可能导致任意拘留，即个人在没有正当理由或法律程序的情况下被拘留。这破坏了法治，并侵蚀了公众对法律系统的信任。 总之，对涉嫌非法移民的个人进行拘留的做法是一个有争议的问题，需要认真考虑。尽管在某些情况下对个人进行拘留可能有合理的理由，但至关重要的是要平衡安全需求与人权保护。政策制定者必须努力建立一个公平公正的移民系统，尊重所有个人的尊严，无论其移民身份如何。只有这样，我们才能希望以人道和有效的方式解决移民带来的复杂挑战。