dichotomizing

简明释义

英[daɪˈkɒtəˌmaɪzɪŋ]美[daɪˈkɑːtəmaɪzɪŋ]

v. 对分，把……分成二（或两部分）（dichotomize 的现在分词）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.These results indicate that somatic and visceral input may converge on single type a spinal ganglion neurons via dichotomizing primary afferents.

结果提示，躯体与内脏输入可通过分叉初级传入，在同一个A型脊神经节神经元上会聚。

2.These results indicate that somatic and visceral input may converge on single type a spinal ganglion neurons via dichotomizing primary afferents.

结果提示，躯体与内脏输入可通过分叉初级传入，在同一个A型脊神经节神经元上会聚。

3.The study focuses on dichotomizing 将...二分 people's attitudes towards climate change into two distinct categories: supporters and skeptics.

这项研究专注于将人们对气候变化的态度dichotomizing 将...二分为两个明确的类别：支持者和怀疑者。

4.In her presentation, she emphasized the risks of dichotomizing 将...二分 complex issues into simple binary choices.

在她的演讲中，她强调了dichotomizing 将...二分复杂问题为简单二元选择的风险。

5.The author warns against dichotomizing 将...二分 social behaviors as either good or bad without considering context.

作者警告说，不考虑背景就dichotomizing 将...二分社会行为为好或坏是有害的。

6.The research aims at dichotomizing 将...二分 the population based on their health behaviors to identify patterns.

这项研究旨在dichotomizing 将...二分人群的健康行为，以识别模式。

7.By dichotomizing 将...二分 the data, the researchers were able to draw clearer conclusions.

通过dichotomizing 将...二分数据，研究人员能够得出更清晰的结论。

作文

In today's society, we often find ourselves engaged in a process of categorization. One of the most common practices is dichotomizing (二分法), which involves dividing complex ideas or groups into two distinct and often opposing categories. This method can be seen in various aspects of our lives, from politics to social issues, and even in personal relationships. While dichotomizing (二分法) can simplify our understanding of complex subjects, it also has its drawbacks. To illustrate this point, consider the political landscape. In many democratic societies, voters are frequently encouraged to align themselves with one of two major parties. This dichotomizing (二分法) of political beliefs can lead to a polarized environment where individuals feel compelled to choose sides rather than engage in nuanced discussions. As a result, important issues may become oversimplified, leading to a lack of understanding and empathy between opposing viewpoints. Moreover, dichotomizing (二分法) can manifest in social issues as well. For instance, discussions surrounding gender identity have often been framed within a binary system of male and female. This approach fails to acknowledge the spectrum of identities that exist beyond these two categories. By dichotomizing (二分法) gender, we risk marginalizing those who do not fit neatly into these classifications, ultimately hindering progress towards inclusivity and understanding. In personal relationships, dichotomizing (二分法) can lead to misunderstandings and conflicts. People may categorize their friends or family members as either 'good' or 'bad,' ignoring the complexities that make us human. This black-and-white thinking can strain relationships and prevent individuals from appreciating the full range of emotions and experiences that others bring to the table. Instead of recognizing the gray areas, we often fall into the trap of labeling, which can create unnecessary tension. However, it is essential to recognize that dichotomizing (二分法) is not inherently negative. In some cases, it can provide clarity and facilitate decision-making. For example, in scientific research, categorizing data into two groups can help researchers identify patterns and draw conclusions more efficiently. The key is to understand when this approach is beneficial and when it may lead to oversimplification. In conclusion, while dichotomizing (二分法) can be a useful tool for understanding complex subjects, it is crucial to remain aware of its limitations. By recognizing the nuances within various topics and avoiding overly simplistic categorizations, we can foster more meaningful discussions and promote a greater sense of empathy and understanding among individuals. Embracing complexity rather than relying solely on dichotomizing (二分法) will ultimately lead to a richer, more inclusive society where diverse perspectives are valued and heard.

在当今社会，我们经常发现自己参与分类的过程。最常见的做法之一是dichotomizing（二分法），这涉及将复杂的思想或群体划分为两个截然不同且通常对立的类别。这种方法可以在我们生活的各个方面看到，从政治到社会问题，甚至在人际关系中。虽然dichotomizing（二分法）可以简化我们对复杂主题的理解，但它也有其缺点。 为了说明这一点，考虑政治格局。在许多民主社会中，选民通常被鼓励与两个主要政党中的一个对齐。这种政治信仰的dichotomizing（二分法）可能导致一个极化的环境，在这个环境中，个人感到被迫选择立场，而不是参与细致的讨论。因此，重要问题可能会变得过于简单化，导致对对立观点之间缺乏理解和同情。 此外，dichotomizing（二分法）也可以在社会问题中表现出来。例如，围绕性别认同的讨论往往被框定在男性和女性的二元系统中。这种方法未能承认存在于这两个类别之外的身份光谱。通过dichotomizing（二分法）性别，我们冒着边缘化那些不符合这些分类的人，最终阻碍了朝向包容性和理解的进步。 在个人关系中，dichotomizing（二分法）可能导致误解和冲突。人们可能将朋友或家人分类为“好”或“坏”，忽略了使我们成为人类的复杂性。这种黑白思维可能会紧张关系，并阻止个人欣赏他人带来的情感和经历的全范围。我们往往陷入标签的陷阱，而不是认识到灰色区域，这可能造成不必要的紧张。 然而，重要的是要认识到，dichotomizing（二分法）并非固有地消极。在某些情况下，它可以提供清晰度并促进决策。例如，在科学研究中，将数据分为两组可以帮助研究人员更有效地识别模式并得出结论。关键是要理解这种方法何时是有益的，以及何时可能导致过于简单化。 总之，虽然dichotomizing（二分法）可以作为理解复杂主题的有用工具，但至关重要的是保持对其局限性的意识。通过认识到各种主题中的细微差别，避免过于简单化的分类，我们可以促进更有意义的讨论，推动个人之间更大的同情和理解。拥抱复杂性而不是仅仅依赖于dichotomizing（二分法）最终将导致一个更丰富、更具包容性的社会，在这个社会中，多样化的观点被重视和倾听。