dictatorially

简明释义

英[ˌdɪktəˈtɔːriəli]美[ˌdɪktəˈtɔːriəli]

adv. 自大地；独裁地

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The manager made decisions dictatorially 专制地, leaving no room for employee input.

经理专制地做出决策，没有给员工任何发言的余地。

2.In the meeting, she spoke dictatorially 专制地, insisting that her plan was the only viable option.

在会议上，她专制地发言，坚称她的计划是唯一可行的选择。

3.He governed the country dictatorially 专制地, suppressing any dissent from the public.

他专制地统治这个国家，压制公众的任何异议。

4.Her dictatorially 专制地 imposed rules left the team feeling undervalued and unmotivated.

她专制地施加的规则让团队感到被低估和缺乏动力。

5.The coach managed the team dictatorially 专制地, demanding absolute obedience from all players.

教练专制地管理球队，要求所有球员绝对服从。

作文

In today's world, the concept of leadership is often scrutinized. Leaders are expected to inspire, motivate, and guide their followers towards a common goal. However, throughout history, there have been numerous instances where leaders have ruled in a manner that can only be described as dictatorially (独裁地). This approach to leadership raises important questions about the nature of power and authority. One of the most notable examples of dictatorially (独裁地) governed regimes is that of Adolf Hitler in Nazi Germany. His rise to power was marked by extreme nationalism and the suppression of dissent. Hitler's government operated on principles that disregarded individual rights and freedoms. Instead of fostering a democratic environment, he ruled with an iron fist, making decisions that affected millions without any input from the populace. This kind of leadership not only stifles creativity and innovation but also leads to widespread fear and oppression. Similarly, in North Korea, Kim Jong-un's regime exemplifies a dictatorially (独裁地) controlled state where the government exercises absolute power over its citizens. The media is heavily censored, and any form of opposition is met with severe punishment. The people live under constant surveillance, and their daily lives are dictated by the whims of the leader. This creates a culture of fear where individuals are afraid to express their thoughts or challenge the status quo. The implications of ruling dictatorially (独裁地) extend beyond the political realm. Economically, countries under such regimes often suffer from stagnation. Without the freedom to innovate or compete, industries may become inefficient and unproductive. For instance, Venezuela's economy has drastically declined under a dictatorially (独裁地) led government, where corruption and mismanagement have led to shortages of basic necessities. On the other hand, democratically elected leaders who respect the rule of law and value public opinion tend to foster environments where citizens can thrive. Countries like Sweden and Canada emphasize transparency and accountability, allowing for a more engaged and informed citizenry. This engagement leads to better decision-making and policies that reflect the needs of the people. In conclusion, while some may argue that a dictatorially (独裁地) controlled leadership can lead to swift decision-making and stability, the long-term consequences are often detrimental. History has shown us that when leaders prioritize their own power over the well-being of their citizens, the result is usually chaos, suffering, and discontent. It is crucial for societies to learn from these past mistakes and strive for governance that empowers individuals rather than suppresses them. The fight against dictatorially (独裁地) driven leadership is ongoing, and it is the responsibility of every citizen to advocate for a system that values democracy and human rights.

在当今世界，领导力的概念常常受到审视。领导者被期望能够激励、鼓舞并引导追随者朝着共同的目标前进。然而，历史上有许多实例表明，领导者以一种只能被描述为dictatorially（独裁地）的方式统治。这种领导方式引发了关于权力和权威本质的重要问题。 最显著的例子之一是阿道夫·希特勒在纳粹德国的统治。他上台的过程充满了极端民族主义和对异议的压制。希特勒的政府运作在无视个人权利和自由的原则之下，而不是营造一个民主环境，他用铁拳统治，做出影响数百万人的决定，而没有任何来自公众的意见。这种领导方式不仅扼杀了创造力和创新，还导致了广泛的恐惧和压迫。 同样，在朝鲜，金正恩的政权是一个典型的dictatorially（独裁地）控制的国家，政府对公民行使绝对权力。媒体受到严格审查，任何形式的反对意见都将遭到严厉惩罚。人们生活在持续的监视之中，他们的日常生活被领导者的意志所支配。这种文化造成了恐惧，人们害怕表达自己的想法或挑战现状。 以dictatorially（独裁地）统治的影响不仅限于政治领域。从经济上看，这样的政权往往会遭受停滞。在没有创新或竞争自由的情况下，产业可能会变得低效和无生产力。例如，委内瑞拉的经济在一个dictatorially（独裁地）领导的政府下急剧下降，腐败和管理不善导致基本必需品短缺。 另一方面，尊重法治和重视公众意见的民主选举领导者往往能营造出一个公民能够蓬勃发展的环境。像瑞典和加拿大这样的国家强调透明度和问责制，使得公民能够更积极地参与和了解。这种参与促进了更好的决策和反映人民需求的政策。 总之，尽管有人可能认为dictatorially（独裁地）控制的领导可以带来迅速的决策和稳定，但长期后果往往是有害的。历史告诉我们，当领导者将自己的权力置于公民福祉之上时，结果通常是混乱、痛苦和不满。社会必须从这些过往的错误中学习，努力追求一种赋予个人权力而不是压制他们的治理体系。与dictatorially（独裁地）驱动的领导的斗争仍在继续，每位公民都有责任倡导一个重视民主和人权的系统。