disavow

简明释义

英[ˌdɪsəˈvaʊ]美[ˌdɪsəˈvaʊ]

vt. 否认，否定；抵赖；拒绝对……的责任

第 三 人 称 单 数 d i s a v o w s

现 在 分 词 d i s a v o w i n g

过 去 式 d i s a v o w e d

过 去 分 词 d i s a v o w e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.But sooner or later Republicans were bound to notice other reasons to disavow Lincoln.

然而，共和党肯定迟早还会注意到否定林肯的其它原因。

2.So a vocal contingent wanted the SBC to amend the Faith and Message to disavow private prayer language.

因此一个活跃的团体希望SBC修改“信念与讯息”以否认私人祈祷语言。

3.It has long been an Israeli demand that the Palestinians, in any deal, should categorically disavow any future plan to reopen territorial or other issues.

长期以来，以色列要求巴勒斯坦人在任何协商中应该无条件杜绝将领土和其他问题留到未来解决。

4.Men, we cannot disavow what happened today.

士兵们，我们不能否认今天发生的一切。

5.She tried to disavow her past.

她试图否认她的过去。

6.I disavow all responsibility for you.

我不承认对你有任何责任。

7.The politician had to disavow his previous statements after the controversy arose.

这位政治家在争议出现后不得不否认他之前的言论。

8.She chose to disavow any association with the group after learning about their activities.

在得知该团体的活动后，她选择否认与该团体的任何关联。

9.The company will disavow any responsibility for the faulty product.

公司将否认对有缺陷产品的任何责任。

10.He publicly disavowed his former mentor's controversial views.

他公开否认了他前任导师的争议观点。

11.After the scandal, the celebrity was quick to disavow any involvement.

在丑闻之后，这位名人迅速否认了任何参与。

作文

In today's complex world, the concept of accountability has become increasingly important. Individuals and organizations alike must take responsibility for their actions. However, there are times when people choose to disavow their previous statements or commitments. The term disavow means to deny any responsibility or support for something, often to distance oneself from a particular idea or action. This behavior raises significant ethical questions about integrity and honesty. Consider a politician who once advocated for a specific policy but later decides to disavow it after public backlash. This shift can be seen as an attempt to protect their image and maintain popularity among constituents. By choosing to disavow their earlier stance, they may escape criticism in the short term, but they risk losing the trust of the public in the long run. Voters often appreciate leaders who stand by their convictions, even in the face of adversity. Similarly, businesses may disavow certain practices when they come under scrutiny. For example, a company that has been accused of unethical labor practices might issue a statement to disavow those practices, claiming they do not reflect the company's values. While this may help to mitigate damage to their reputation, it can also appear disingenuous if the company does not take concrete steps to rectify the situation. Stakeholders expect transparency and accountability, and merely disavowing past actions without meaningful change can lead to further distrust. On a personal level, individuals may also find themselves in situations where they feel compelled to disavow their past behaviors or beliefs. For instance, someone who was once part of a controversial group may later decide to disavow their affiliation, citing personal growth and a change in values. While this can be a positive step towards self-improvement, it is essential for the individual to acknowledge their past honestly rather than simply erase it. Authenticity matters, and learning from past mistakes is crucial for personal development. The act of disavowing something can serve as a double-edged sword. On one hand, it allows individuals and organizations to distance themselves from negative associations. On the other hand, it can lead to accusations of hypocrisy or a lack of commitment. In a world where information spreads rapidly, the consequences of disavowing actions can be far-reaching. Social media amplifies these situations, as people quickly share their opinions and experiences, often leading to public outcry. Ultimately, the decision to disavow something should not be taken lightly. It is essential to weigh the potential benefits against the risks involved. Genuine accountability involves acknowledging past actions and making amends rather than simply attempting to erase them from memory. In conclusion, while disavowing certain beliefs or actions may seem like an easy way out, true integrity lies in facing the truth and taking responsibility for one's choices. Only then can we foster a culture of trust and authenticity in our personal lives and society at large.

在当今复杂的世界中，问责制的概念变得越来越重要。个人和组织都必须对自己的行为负责。然而，有时人们选择否认他们之前的声明或承诺。否认这个词意味着否认对某事的任何责任或支持，通常是为了与特定的想法或行动保持距离。这种行为引发了关于诚信和诚实的重要伦理问题。 考虑一位曾经倡导特定政策的政治家，但在公众反对后决定否认该政策。这种转变可以被视为一种保护他们形象和维持选民受欢迎度的尝试。通过选择否认他们早期的立场，他们可能在短期内逃避批评，但他们也冒着在长期内失去公众信任的风险。选民通常欣赏那些在逆境中坚持自己信念的领导者。 同样，企业在受到审查时也可能否认某些做法。例如，一家因不道德劳动实践而受到指控的公司可能会发布声明以否认这些做法，声称它们并不反映公司的价值观。虽然这可能有助于减轻对其声誉的损害，但如果公司没有采取切实措施来纠正情况，这也可能显得不真诚。利益相关者期待透明和问责，而仅仅通过否认过去的行为而不进行有意义的改变可能会导致进一步的不信任。 在个人层面上，个体也可能发现自己处于必须否认过去行为或信仰的境地。例如，曾经是一个有争议团体成员的人可能会决定否认他们的隶属关系，称之为个人成长和价值观的变化。虽然这可以被视为自我改善的积极步骤，但个人诚实地承认自己的过去至关重要，而不是简单地将其抹去。真实性很重要，从过去的错误中学习对于个人发展至关重要。 否认某事的行为可以是一把双刃剑。一方面，它使个人和组织能够与负面关联保持距离。另一方面，它可能导致虚伪或缺乏承诺的指控。在信息迅速传播的世界中，否认行为的后果可能影响深远。社交媒体放大了这些情况，因为人们迅速分享他们的观点和经历，往往导致公众的愤怒。 最终，否认某事的决定不应轻言。权衡潜在的好处与所涉及的风险至关重要。真正的问责制涉及承认过去的行为并进行补救，而不仅仅是试图将其从记忆中抹去。总之，尽管否认某些信念或行为似乎是一个简单的解决方案，但真正的诚信在于面对真相并对自己的选择负责。只有这样，我们才能在个人生活和社会整体中培养信任和真实性的文化。