disentitle
简明释义
英[ˌdɪsɪnˈtaɪt(ə)l]美[ˌdɪsenˈtaɪtl]
v. 剥夺(某人)的权利
第 三 人 称 单 数 d i s e n t i t l e s
现 在 分 词 d i s e n t i t l i n g
过 去 式 d i s e n t i t l e d
过 去 分 词 d i s e n t i t l e d
英英释义
剥夺某人的权利或资格。 |
单词用法
剥夺某人对某物的权利 | |
剥夺申请人的权利 | |
根据法律剥夺 | |
因不当行为而剥夺 |
同义词
剥夺 | 事件发生后,他被剥夺了权利。 | ||
取消资格 | She was disqualified from the competition due to a rule violation. | 由于违反规则,她被取消了比赛资格。 | |
排除 | 他们决定将他排除在小组活动之外。 | ||
移除 | 新政策将从员工中移除某些福利。 |
反义词
赋予权利 | The new policy will entitle all employees to additional benefits. | 新政策将赋予所有员工额外的福利。 | |
授权 | He was authorized to make decisions on behalf of the company. | 他被授权代表公司做决定。 |
例句
1.The court ruled that the failure to meet the requirements would disentitle him from receiving the benefits.
法院裁定,未能满足要求将会剥夺他获得福利的资格。
2.If you do not comply with the new regulations, it may disentitle you from participating in the program.
如果你不遵守新规定,可能会剥夺你参与该项目的资格。
3.Her actions could disentitle her from any future claims against the company.
她的行为可能会剥夺她对公司未来索赔的权利。
4.Failing to submit your application on time will disentitle you from consideration for the scholarship.
未能按时提交申请将会剥夺你获得奖学金的考虑资格。
5.The policy clearly states that any misconduct will disentitle employees from bonuses.
政策明确指出,任何不当行为将会剥夺员工获得奖金的资格。
作文
In today's society, the concept of rights and entitlements is often debated. Many people believe that certain rights are inherent and should not be taken away. However, there are situations where individuals can become disqualified from these rights due to specific actions or circumstances. This process is known as disentitle, which means to take away someone's entitlement to something, often as a result of their own behavior or decisions. For instance, consider the case of social welfare programs. These programs are designed to assist those in need, providing them with financial aid and other resources. However, if an individual commits fraud to obtain benefits they do not deserve, they may be disentitled from receiving further assistance. This is a necessary measure to ensure that resources are allocated fairly and that those who genuinely need help are not deprived of it due to the actions of others. Similarly, in the context of employment, an employee may be disentitled to certain benefits if they violate company policies. For example, if an employee is found guilty of misconduct, such as harassment or theft, the employer has the right to revoke any bonuses or additional perks that the employee might have been entitled to. This serves as a reminder that entitlements often come with responsibilities, and failing to meet those responsibilities can lead to consequences. Moreover, the legal system also recognizes the concept of disentitle. In cases of inheritance, if a beneficiary is found to have caused harm to the deceased or committed a crime against them, the court may rule to disentitle that individual from receiving their inheritance. This principle upholds the idea that one should not benefit from wrongdoing, reinforcing moral and ethical standards within society. However, the application of disentitle can sometimes lead to controversy. Critics argue that the criteria for disentitling someone can be subjective and may disproportionately affect marginalized groups. For instance, if social welfare programs are too strict about eligibility, they may inadvertently disentitle those who genuinely need assistance but fail to meet bureaucratic requirements. Therefore, while the process of disentitle is essential for maintaining fairness and justice, it must be applied judiciously and with consideration for all individuals involved. In conclusion, the term disentitle reflects a crucial aspect of how rights and entitlements are managed in various contexts. Whether in social services, employment, or legal matters, the ability to disentitle individuals serves as a mechanism to protect resources and uphold ethical standards. However, it is vital to ensure that this power is wielded fairly and with compassion, so that it does not unjustly harm those who are already vulnerable. As we navigate the complexities of rights and responsibilities, the concept of disentitle will continue to play a significant role in shaping our societal norms and values.
在当今社会,权利和权益的概念经常被讨论。许多人认为某些权利是固有的,不应被剥夺。然而,在特定的行为或环境下,个人可能会失去这些权利,这一过程被称为disentitle,即剥夺某人对某事的权益,通常是由于他们自己的行为或决定。 例如,考虑社会福利计划的案例。这些计划旨在帮助那些需要帮助的人,为他们提供财务援助和其他资源。然而,如果一个人通过欺诈手段获得他们不应得的福利,他们可能会被disentitle,无法再获得进一步的援助。这是确保资源公平分配的必要措施,确保真正需要帮助的人不会因他人的行为而受到剥夺。 同样,在就业的背景下,如果员工违反公司政策,他们可能会被disentitle某些福利。例如,如果员工被发现有不当行为,如骚扰或盗窃,雇主有权撤销该员工可能享有的任何奖金或额外福利。这提醒我们,权益往往伴随着责任,未能履行这些责任可能会导致后果。 此外,法律系统也承认disentitle的概念。在继承案件中,如果受益人被发现对死者造成伤害或对其犯罪,法院可能会裁定剥夺该个人的继承权。这一原则强调了一个人不应从不当行为中获益,从而强化了社会中的道德和伦理标准。 然而,disentitle的应用有时会引发争议。批评者认为,剥夺某人权益的标准可能是主观的,并可能对边缘化群体造成不成比例的影响。例如,如果社会福利计划对资格要求过于严格,可能会无意中disentitle那些真正需要帮助但未能满足官僚要求的人。因此,虽然disentitle的过程对于维护公平和正义至关重要,但必须谨慎地应用,并考虑到所有相关个人。 总之,disentitle这一术语反映了在各种背景下如何管理权利和权益的重要方面。无论是在社会服务、就业还是法律事务中,能够disentitle个人的能力作为保护资源和维护伦理标准的机制。然而,确保这一权力的公正和富有同情心地使用至关重要,以免无辜伤害那些已经脆弱的人。在我们应对权利和责任的复杂性时,disentitle的概念将继续在塑造我们的社会规范和价值观方面发挥重要作用。
文章标题:disentitle的意思是什么
文章链接:https://www.liuxue886.cn/danci/339567.html
本站文章均为原创,未经授权请勿用于任何商业用途
发表评论